Literature DB >> 21456019

Clinical utility of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current overall survival after primary tumor resection.

Piotr Rutkowski1, Agnieszka Wozniak, Maria Dębiec-Rychter, Michał Kąkol, Wirginiusz Dziewirski, Marcin Zdzienicki, Konrad Ptaszynski, Monika Jurkowska, Janusz Limon, Janusz A Siedlecki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to assess the reliability of the new revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Armed Forces Institute of Pathology risk classification and to analyze the factors that influence after resection for primary GISTs in 2 AJCC groups: patients with GISTs originating from the stomach and omentum (G-GISTs) and patients with other primary GISTs located mainly in the small bowel (nongastric GISTs [NG-GISTs]).
METHODS: The authors prospectively analyzed a group of 640 patients with primary, CD117-positive GISTs who underwent surgery with curative intention (R0/R1 resection), including 340 G-GISTs (55.5%) and 300 NG-GISTs (44.5%). Factors were explored that had an effect on disease-free survival time (DFS), which was calculated from the date of radical operation to the date of recurrence or last follow-up. The median follow-up was 39 months.
RESULTS: Compared with NG-GISTs, G-GISTs were characterized by a significantly lower median size (5.3 cm and 8.5 cm, respectively; P < .0001) and lower mitotic activity (median, 3 in 50 high-power fields [HPF] vs 5 in 50 HPF; P < .0001), and they were diagnosed in older patients (median age, 62 years vs 57 years; P = .002). The most commonly detected mutations in G-GIST were those located in KIT exon 11 (60.5%) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) exon 18 (19%) versus KIT exons 11 and 9 in NG-GISTs (72% and 17.4%, respectively). The prognosis of patients who had G-GISTs was significantly better compared that of patients who had NG-GISTs, with 5-year DFS rates of 69% (median, 83 months) versus 43% (median, 33 months), respectively (P < .00001). The most significant prognostic factors that correlated with shorter DFS in both G-GISTs and NG-GISTs were primary tumor size >5 cm and >10 cm (P < .0001) and mitotic index >5 in 50 HPF and >10 in 50 HPF (P < .0001). The 5-year DFS rates in G-GISTs according to AJCC stage categories were as follows: 96% for stage IA tumors, 92% for stage IB tumors, 51% for II tumors, 22% for stage IIIA tumors, and 22% for stage IIIB tumors (P < .0001). The 5-year DFS rates in NG-GISTs according to AJCC categories were as follows: 92% for stage I tumors, 66% for stage II tumors, 28% for IIIA tumors, and 16% for IIIB tumors (P < .0001). The high prognostic significance of the AJCC classification also was confirmed for overall survival data, including the impact of therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of AJCC risk classification after resection of primary GIST was confirmed for DFS and overall survival. Patients with primary G-GISTs had a better prognosis than patients with NG-GISTs. In both groups, primary tumor size and mitotic activity were the most important prognostic factors in terms of DFS.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21456019     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approaches to gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an institutional review of 57 cases.

Authors:  Michael J Pucci; Adam C Berger; Pei-Wen Lim; Karen A Chojnacki; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2-weighted image fusion for the detection of abdominal solid cancer.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Kazunori Fugo; Satomi Tanaka; Takafumi Sunaoshi; Daisuke Kano; Eriko Sugiyama; Misaki Shite; Ryouta Haga; Yoshiya Fukamizu; Toshiyuki Fujita; Satoshi Kagayama; Rumiko Hasegawa; Akira Togawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Noboru Ichiki; Yuji Oshima; Naoto Koike; Yasuko Toshimitsu; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Takashi Kishimoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Giant gastrointestinal stromal tumour of rare sarcomatoid epithelioid subtype: case study and literature review.

Authors:  Gustaw Lech; Wojciech Korcz; Emilia Kowalczyk; Tomasz Guzel; Marcin Radoch; Ireneusz Wojciech Krasnodębski
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Long-term functional outcomes of laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Jeremy A Dressler; Francesco Palazzo; Adam C Berger; Seth Stake; Asadulla Chaudhary; Karen A Chojnacki; Ernest L Rosato; Michael J Pucci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  A young man with primary prostatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a rare case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Zhang; Guo-Wei Feng; Zhi-Fei Liu; Lei Qiao; Tao Zhang; Chao Gao; Yong Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

6.  Correlation of dynamic PET and gene array data in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Dirk Koczan; Leyun Pan; Peter Hohenberger
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-06-04

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 156 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jia-Qin Cai; Ke Chen; Yi-Ping Mou; Yu Pan; Xiao-Wu Xu; Yu-Cheng Zhou; Chao-Jie Huang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Expression of legumain correlates with prognosis and metastasis in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Pengtao Guo; Zhi Zhu; Zhe Sun; Zhenning Wang; Xinyu Zheng; Huimian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What are the current outcomes of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: who are the long-term survivors treated initially with imatinib?

Authors:  Piotr Rutkowski; Jolanta Andrzejuk; Elżbieta Bylina; Czesław Osuch; Tomasz Switaj; Anna Jerzak vel Dobosz; Urszula Grzesiakowska; Monika Jurkowska; Agnieszka Woźniak; Janusz Limon; Maria Dębiec-Rychter; Janusz A Siedlecki
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach: a multicenter, retrospective study of curatively resected gastric GISTs.

Authors:  In-Hwan Kim; In-Ho Kim; Sang-Gyu Kwak; Se Won Kim; Hyun-Dong Chae
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.