| Literature DB >> 21455421 |
K Bharavi1, A Gopala Reddy, G S Rao, P Ravi Kumar, D Srinivas Kumar, P Prabhu Prasadini.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of various herbal adaptogens such as shade-dried powders of Withania somnifera, Ocimum sanctum, Asperagus recemosus, Andrographis paniculata, Asphaltum panjabinum (Shilajith), Gymnema sylvestre, Spirulina platensis, and Panex ginseng on cadmium (Cd)-induced oxidative stress and its accumulation in broiler chicken.Entities:
Keywords: Heavy metal; herbal antioxidants; oxidative stress
Year: 2011 PMID: 21455421 PMCID: PMC3062120 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.75669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Body weight gain (g) of different groups of broiler chicks
| 1 | 388.4 ± 5.94 | 307.3 ± 10.66 |
| 2 | 167.2 ± 9.06 | 139.4 ± 5.79 |
| 3 | 163.6 ± 11.81 | 414.4 ± 7.42 |
| 4 | 144.2 ± 8.01 | 430.9 ± 27.48 |
| 5 | 120.8 ± 8.67 | 361.1 ± 10.85 |
| 6 | 120.5 ± 13.08 | 410.9 ± 10.89 |
| 7 | 178.0 ± 13.55 | 351.3 ± 16.79 |
| 8 | 175.6 ± 9.05 | 283.0 ± 6.74 |
| 9 | 165.91 ± 7.00 | 292.5 ± 22.88 |
| 10 | 147.8 ± 10.50 | 340.8 ± 21.69 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8); one-way ANOVA (SPSS) was used
Figure 1Effect of various herbal adaptogens on cadmium-induced tissue LPO and GSH levels of liver and kidney tissue of broiler chicken (n = 8). Values are expressed as mean ± SE; ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison was used. Means with different alphabets as superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
Figure 2Effect of various herbal adaptogens on cadmium-induced changes in serum ALT activity of broiler chicken (n = 8). Values are expressed as mean ± SE; ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison was used. Means with different alphabets as superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
Figure 4Effect of various herbal adaptogens on cadmium-induced changes in serum creatinine concentration (mg/dL) of broiler chicken (n = 8). Values are expressed as mean ± SE; ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison was used. Means with different alphabets as superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
Tissue cadmium levels (µg/g wet tissue) in different groups of broiler chickens
| 1. | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.01 |
| 2. | 67.25 ± 1.87 | 75.10 ± 2.89 |
| 3. | 13.28 ± 0.43 | 41.57 ± 2022 |
| 4. | 13.74 ± 0.45 | 41.93 ± 2.91 |
| 5. | 22.43 ± 1.30 | 45.93 ± 2.60 |
| 6. | 20.10 ± 1.09 | 43.15 ± 2.81 |
| 7. | 15.15 ± 1.82 | 42.29 ± 3.21 |
| 8. | 17.51 ± 1.21 | 43.81 ± 3.15 |
| 9. | 15.64 ± 1.08 | 42.71 ± 2.89 |
| 10. | 18.19 ± 1.21 | 44.01 ± 2.54 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE; ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison was used
Figure 5Schematic diagram of mechanism of cadmium-induced free radical generation. Herbal antioxidants scavenge the oxygen free radical and chelate Cd. O¯2: oxygen free radical; HO•: hydroxyl radical; ¯OH: hydroxyl ion; HOOH: hydrogen peroxide; HOH: water; SOD: superoxide dismutase; MET: mitochondrial electron transport; ATPsyn: ATP synthase; aa: amino acid; Cd: cadmium; CdGSH: cadmium– GSH complex; Cdmt: cadmium metallothionine complex; CdAlb: cadmiumalbumin complex; Ca2+: calcium ions; CAT: catalase; Ca2+-ATPase: calcium ATPase; (+): positive effect; (−): negative effect