| Literature DB >> 21455417 |
A Vijayalakshmi1, V Ravichandiran, J Anbu, Malarkodi Velraj, S Jayakumari.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the anticonvulsant activity and neurotoxicity of ethanolic extract and ethyl acetate fraction of the rhizome of Smilax china (EESC and EAF, respectively) in mice.Entities:
Keywords: China root; Epilepsy; Smilax china; neurotoxicity
Year: 2011 PMID: 21455417 PMCID: PMC3062115 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.75662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Effect of EESC and EAF on pentobarbitone-induced sleeping time, sleep latency and rotarod test in rats
| I | Vehicle | 1 mL | 244.5 ± 3.40 | 172.33 ± 2.42 | 258.80 ± 34.00 |
| III | EESC | 125 mg/kg | 235.83 ± 3.91 | 181.83 ± 2.78 | 231.45 ± 23.49 |
| IV | EESC | 250 mg/kg | 202.17 ± 3.38 | 192.33 ± 3.76 | 241.70 ± 22.90 |
| V | EESC | 500 mg/kg | 198.00 ± 2.51 | 261.78 ± 1.98 | 191.47 ± 16.79 |
| VI | EAF | 125 mg/kg | 230.17 ± 2.42 | 197.83 ± 1.06 | 226.82 ± 32.45 |
| VII | EAF | 2750 mg/kg | 177.83 ± 3.91 | 375.17 ± 2.66 | 237.30 ± 28.87 |
| VIII | EAF | 500 mg/kg | 124.83 ± 2.76 | 364.50 ± 3.78 | 206.54 ± 43.80 |
EESC: Ethanolic extract of Smilax china Linn.; EAF: Ethyl acetate fraction; Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6) statistical significance was determined by ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s “t” test (n =6);
P < 0.001,
P < 0.01,
*P < 0.05 when compared against control aP < 0.001, bP < 0.01, when compared against standard
Effect of EESC and EAF on maximal electroshock induced seizures in mice
| I | Vehicle | 1 mL | 16.1 ± 0.75 | 72.33 |
| II | Phenytoin | 20 mg/kg | 9.3 ± 0.7 | 100 |
| III | EESC | 100 mg/kg | 13.66 ± 0.91 | 94.33 |
| IV | EESC | 200 mg/kg | 12.83 ± 0.60 | 100 |
| V | EESC | 400 mg/kg | 11.30 ± 0.33 | 100 |
| VI | EAF | 100 mg/kg | 12.33 ± 0.42 | 100 |
| VII | EAF | 200 mg/kg | 10.16 ± 0.70 | 100 |
| VIII | EAF | 400 mg/kg | 8.83 ± 0.30 | 100 |
EESC: Ethanolic extract of Smilax china Linn.; EAF: Ethyl acetate fraction; Values are mean ± SEM (n =6). Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s “t” test (n=6);
P < 0.001,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.05 when compared against control
P < 0.001,
P < 0.01,
when compared against standard
Effect of EESC and EAF on PTZ-induced seizures in mice
| I | Vehicle | 1 mL | 190.33 ± 1.83 | 8.16 ± 0.40 | 0 |
| II | Diazepam | 2 mg/kg | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| III | EESC | 100 mg/kg | 268.33 ± 13.01 | 4.83 ± 0.30 | 54 |
| IV | EESC | 200 mg/kg | 298.33 ± 25.48 | 14.83 ± 0.30 | 100 |
| V | EESC | 400 mg/kg | 481.83 ± 2.83 | 19.16 ± 0.65 | 100 |
| VI | EAF | 100 mg/kg | 289.16 ± 7.79 | 2.66 ± 0.21 | 83 |
| VII | EAF | 200 mg/kg | 356 ± 6.42 | 2.83 ± 0.16 | 100 |
| VIII | EAF | 400 mg/kg | 495 ± 9.83 | 5.5 ± 0.34 | 100 |
EESC: Ethanolic extract of Smilax china Linn.; EAF: Ethyl acetate fraction; Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s “t” test (n=6);
P < 0.001,
P < 0.01,
*P < 0.05 when compared against control
P < 0.001,
when compared against standard