Literature DB >> 21454950

Managing mesh erosion after abdominal pelvic organ prolapse repair: ten years' experience in a single center.

Elisabetta Costantini1, Alessandro Zucchi, Massimo Lazzeri, Michele Del Zingaro, Alberto Vianello, Massimo Porena.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report conservative and surgical strategies for treatment of mesh erosion after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, 179 patients underwent integral pelvic floor reconstruction for advanced POP in our tertiary urogynecological unit. Patients' charts and follow-up data were entered into a computerized database and data analysis performed to search for mesh erosion/complications/surgery.
RESULTS: 12 patients were diagnosed and treated for mesh erosion: in 10 of 179, surgery was performed in our department and the mesh used was polypropylene (PP): 3 after colposacropexy (CSP) (5.5%), 5 after CSP + hysterectomy (Hys) (6.5%), and 2 after hysterosacropexy (HSP) (3.9%); in 1 case, Gore-tex mesh was used, and another case had undergone CSP in another hospital using PP mesh. Time to mesh erosion ranged from 2 to 66 months (mean 22.9), with 4 erosions (33%) within 6 months of POP repair. In 4 asymptomatic patients (33%) erosion was incidentally discovered during clinical check-ups at 4, 31, 36 and 66 months. Five cases (41%) presented with occasional vaginal bleeding, associated with dyspareunia in 2. Treatments were individualized but in all cases conservative treatment was unable to resolve the complications and surgery was needed. At a mean follow-up of 57 months (range 18-120) after surgical treatment all patients were asymptomatic and free from erosions.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon who approaches management of complications after abdominal/laparoscopic sacropexy should possess a comprehensive understanding of pelvic floor anatomy and surgical skills in order to individualize the management of such complications.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21454950     DOI: 10.1159/000324243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

1.  Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia.

Authors:  Ketul Shah; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Daniel Gilsdorf; Brian J Flynn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Update in management of vaginal mesh erosion.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Laurence Peyrat; François Haab
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A novel approach to mesh revision after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Melissa L Dawson; Rinko Rebecca; Nima M Shah; Kristene E Whitmore
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

4.  Mesh erosion following abdominal sacral colpopexy in the absence and presence of the cervical stump.

Authors:  Shimon Ginath; Alan D Garely; Alexander Condrea; Michael D Vardy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Justin O Daly; Joanne Dean; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Management of Mesh Complications after SUI and POP Repair: Review and Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  D Barski; D Y Deng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Gopal H Badlani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.