Literature DB >> 21454718

In search of an optimal bedside screening program for arteriovenous fistula stenosis.

Nicola Tessitore1, Valeria Bedogna, Edoardo Melilli, Deborah Millardi, Giancarlo Mansueto, Giovanni Lipari, William Mantovani, Elda Baggio, Albino Poli, Antonio Lupo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend systematically screening for stenosis using various methods, but no studies so far have compared all of the options. A prospective blinded study was performed to compare the performance of several bedside tests performed during dialysis in diagnosing angiographically proven >50% fistula stenosis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In an unselected population of 119 hemodialysis patients with mature fistulas, physical examination (PE) was conducted; dynamic and derived static venous pressure (VAPR), blood pump flow/arterial pressure (Qb/AP) ratio, recirculation (R), and access blood flow (Qa) were measured; and angiography was performed.
RESULTS: Angiography identified 59 stenotic fistulas: 43 stenoses were located upstream from the venous needle (inflow stenosis), 12 were located downstream (outflow stenosis), and 4 were located at both sites. The optimal tests for identifying an inflow stenosis were Qa < 650 ml/min and the combination of a positive PE "or" Qa < 650 ml/min (accuracy 80% and 81%, respectively), the latter being preferable because it was more sensitive (85% versus 65%, respectively) for a comparable specificity (79% versus 89%, respectively). The best tests for identifying outflow stenosis were PE and VAPR, with no difference between the two (accuracy 91% and 85%, sensitivity 75% and 81%, specificity 93% and 86%, respectively), the former being preferable because it was more reproducible, easier to perform, and applicable to all fistulas.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that fistula stenosis can be detected and located during dialysis with a moderate-to-excellent accuracy using PE and Qa measurement as screening procedures.
© 2011 by the American Society of Nephrology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21454718      PMCID: PMC3069375          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.06220710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  22 in total

Review 1.  Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. Technology Assessment Committee.

Authors:  R J Gray; D Sacks; L G Martin; S O Trerotola
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurement in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in native forearm arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Nicola Tessitore; Valeria Bedogna; Linda Gammaro; Giovanni Lipari; Albino Poli; Elda Baggio; Maria Firpo; Giovanni Morana; Giancarlo Mansueto; Giuseppe Maschio
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Petra Macaskill; Stephen D Walter; Les Irwig; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Dynamic venous access pressure ratio test for hemodialysis access monitoring.

Authors:  Stanley Frinak; Gerard Zasuwa; Thomas Dunfee; Anatole Besarab; Jerry Yee
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of inflow stenosis of arteriovenous fistulae: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Loay Salman; Marco Ladino; Manju Alex; Rajiv Dhamija; Donna Merrill; Oliver Lenz; Gabriel Contreras; Arif Asif
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Vascular access monitoring: methods and procedures--something to standardize?

Authors:  Frantisek Lopot; Bohdan Nejedlý; Martin Válek
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic).

Authors:  Thomas McGinn; Peter C Wyer; Thomas B Newman; Sheri Keitz; Rosanne Leipzig; Gordon Guyatt For
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Michael Allon; Michelle L Robbin
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Flow monitoring: performance characteristics of ultrasound dilution versus color Doppler ultrasound compared with fistulography.

Authors:  Christoph Schwarz; Christa Mitterbauer; Maryla Boczula; Thomas Maca; Martin Funovics; Georg Heinze; Matthias Lorenz; Josef Kovarik; Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Utility of intra-access pressure monitoring in detecting and correcting venous outlet stenoses prior to thrombosis.

Authors:  A Besarab; K L Sullivan; R P Ross; M J Moritz
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Combined functional and anatomical diagnostic endpoints for assessing arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.

Authors:  Ehsan Rajabi-Jaghargh; Rupak K Banerjee
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

2.  Bedside screening for fistula stenosis should be tailored to the site of the arteriovenous anastomosis.

Authors:  Nicola Tessitore; Valeria Bedogna; Giovanni Lipari; Edoardo Melilli; William Mantovani; Elda Baggio; Antonio Lupo; Giancarlo Mansueto; Albino Poli
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Dialysis: Early pre-emptive intervention might reduce AVF access loss.

Authors:  Jan H M Tordoir
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Surveillance and monitoring of dialysis access.

Authors:  Lalathaksha Kumbar; Jariatul Karim; Anatole Besarab
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-22

Review 5.  Vascular access today.

Authors:  Konstantinos Pantelias; Eirini Grapsa
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-06

6.  Arteriovenous Access Failure, Stenosis, and Thrombosis.

Authors:  Jennifer M MacRae; Christine Dipchand; Matthew Oliver; Louise Moist; Charmaine Lok; Edward Clark; Swapnil Hiremath; Joanne Kappel; Mercedeh Kiaii; Rick Luscombe; Lisa M Miller
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-09-27

7.  Quantification of the severity of outflow stenosis of hemodialysis fistulas with a pulse- and thrill-based scoring system.

Authors:  Matt Chiung-Yu Chen; Mei-Jui Weng; Bai-Chun Chang; Hsiu-Ching Lai; Misoso Yi-Wen Wu; Chia-Yun Fu; Yi-Chun Liu; Wen-Che Chi
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas.

Authors:  Matt Chiung-Yu Chen; Mei-Jui Weng; Misoso Yi-Wen Wu; Yi-Chun Liu; Wen-Che Chi
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Application of ultrasonography in monitoring the complications of autologous arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Chong Ren; Jing Chen; Yong Wang; Bihong Huang; Wenwen Lu; Yanpei Cao; Xiaoli Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Choi; Young-Ki Lee; Hayne Cho Park; Eun Yi Kim; Ajin Cho; Chaehoon Han; Sun Ryoung Choi; Hanmyun Kim; Eun-Jung Kim; Jong-Woo Yoon; Jung-Woo Noh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.