Miguel A Hernán1, David Clayton, Niels Keiding. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, MA 02115, USA. miguel_hernan@post.havard.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a famous article, Simpson described a hypothetical data example that led to apparently paradoxical results. METHODS: We make the causal structure of Simpson's example explicit. RESULTS: We show how the paradox disappears when the statistical analysis is appropriately guided by subject-matter knowledge. We also review previous explanations of Simpson's paradox that attributed it to two distinct phenomena: confounding and non-collapsibility. CONCLUSION: Analytical errors may occur when the problem is stripped of its causal context and analyzed merely in statistical terms.
BACKGROUND: In a famous article, Simpson described a hypothetical data example that led to apparently paradoxical results. METHODS: We make the causal structure of Simpson's example explicit. RESULTS: We show how the paradox disappears when the statistical analysis is appropriately guided by subject-matter knowledge. We also review previous explanations of Simpson's paradox that attributed it to two distinct phenomena: confounding and non-collapsibility. CONCLUSION: Analytical errors may occur when the problem is stripped of its causal context and analyzed merely in statistical terms.
Authors: Ian A Sigal; Hongli Yang; Michael D Roberts; Jonathan L Grimm; Claude F Burgoyne; Shaban Demirel; J Crawford Downs Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Robert Brown; Scott A Stuart; Scott S Stuart; Stephane Houel; Natalie G Ahn; William M Old Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Islam Y Elgendy; Ahmed Mahmoud; Jonathan J Shuster; Rami Doukky; David E Winchester Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 5.952