Literature DB >> 21454084

Comparison of mandibular vertical growth in hemifacial microsomia patients treated with early distraction or not treated: follow up till the completion of growth.

Maria Costanza Meazzini1, Fabio Mazzoleni, Alberto Bozzetti, Roberto Brusati.   

Abstract

AIM: Comparison of the long-term follow-up until the completion of growth of two homogeneous samples of children affected by hemifacial microsomia (HFM), one treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the deciduous or early mixed dentition, the other not subjected to any treatment until adulthood. MATERIAL: Fourteen patients affected by vertically severe type I or II HFM were operated at an average age of 5.9 years with an average follow-up of 11.2 years. They were compared to a sample of eight patients who were never treated until the completion of growth.
METHODS: Mandibular vertical changes were measured on panoramic radiographs taken at different time points. Ratios between affected and non affected ramal heights were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: In the DO sample, after correction, mandibular vertical changes showed a gradual return of the asymmetry with growth in all patients. The ratio in the non treated sample was unchanged between the initial and the long term panoramic x-rays.
CONCLUSION: The facial proportions of HFM patients are maintained, when not treated, throughout growth. The same proportions return to their original asymmetry after DO. Even though short term aesthetic and psychological advantages of distraction osteogenesis are well accepted, early surgery should only be applied after careful patient selection and honest clarification of the long term recurrence by genetically guided craniofacial growth pattern.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21454084     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

Review 1.  Goldenhar syndrome: current perspectives.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bogusiak; Aleksandra Puch; Piotr Arkuszewski
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 2.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

3.  An isogenic model of murine mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sagar S Deshpande; Daniela M Weiss; Alexis Donneys; Katherine K Gallagher; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Deniz Sarhaddi; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Vascular analysis as a proxy for mechanostransduction response in an isogenic, irradiated murine model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sagar S Deshpande; Alexis Donneys; Stephen Y Kang; Erin E Page; Peter A Felice; Lauren Kiryakoza; Noah S Nelson; Jose Rodriguez; Samir S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.514

5.  Three-dimensional characterization of mandibular asymmetry in craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Yun-Fang Chen; Frank Baan; Robin Bruggink; Ewald Bronkhorst; Yu-Fang Liao; Edwin Ongkosuwito
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew A Heggie; Ricky Kumar; Jocelyn M Shand
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.