Literature DB >> 21453391

Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh and autogenous particulate bone graft: computed tomography-based evaluations of augmented bone quality and quantity.

Ikuya Miyamoto1, Katsuyuki Funaki, Kensuke Yamauchi, Takashi Kodama, Tetsu Takahashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and quantity of augmented bone following alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh and autogenous particulate bone graft for implant placement in terms of the preoperative bone defect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (50 sites) rehabilitated between September 2000 and May 2009 with autogenous particulate intraoral bone or iliac cancellous bone marrow grafts and micro-titanium meshes were enrolled. We classified the bone defects by means of shape as complex horizontal-vertical (HV), horizontal (H), and socket (S) types, and the augmented bone was evaluated based on preoperative computed tomographic data. The postsurgical complications were assessed during the healing period and after implant superstructure placement.
RESULTS: The bone defects were successfully augmented using the titanium mesh technique. The HV-type defect was the most difficult to augment (mean horizontal gain, 3.7 ± 2.0 [SD] mm; mean vertical gain, 5.4 ± 3.4 [SD] mm). The mean horizontal gain with the H-type defect was 3.9 ± 1.9 mm. The S-type defect achieved the most efficient bone augmentation (mean horizontal gain, 5.7 ± 1.4 [SD] mm; mean vertical gain, 12.4 ± 3.1 [SD] mm). The major postsurgical complications were mesh exposure, infection, total or partial bone resorption, and temporary neurological disturbances. Implant failure was observed in one case. The HV-type defect showed significantly higher bone resorption (p < .05) than the other defect types.
CONCLUSIONS: Autogenous bone grafting with titanium mesh allows adequate vertical and horizontal alveolar bone reconstruction both quantitatively and qualitatively for implant placement. However, the clinical outcome of augmentation depends on the type of preoperative bone defect.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21453391     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  15 in total

1.  Rigid occlusive titanium barriers for alveolar bone augmentation: two reports with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Wilfried Engelke; Oscar Deccó; Andrea C Cura; Eduardo Borie; Víctor Beltrán
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 2.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

3.  Horizontal bone augmentation using two membranes at dehisced implant sites: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Rakhshinda Nahid; Monika Bansal; Samidha Pandey
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation.

Authors:  Hyun-Chang Lim; Jung-Seok Lee; Seong-Ho Choi; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Localized ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla using titanium mesh, an alloplast, and a nano-bone graft: a case report.

Authors:  Adel S Alagl; Marwa Madi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: current application and progress.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Songhang Li; Tianxu Zhang; Chao Wang; Xiaoxiao Cai
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.344

7.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Bone Healing Capacity of a Novel Bone Grafting Material Combined with Hyaluronic Acid.

Authors:  Annica Pröhl; Milijana Batinic; Said Alkildani; Michael Hahn; Milena Radenkovic; Stevo Najman; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  3D-based buccal augmentation for ideal prosthetic implant alignment-an optimized method and report on 7 cases with pronounced buccal concavities.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Nickenig; Maximilian Riekert; Matthias Zirk; Max-Philipp Lentzen; Joachim E Zöller; Matthias Kreppel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.606

9.  Reconstruction of alveolar bone defect with autogenous bone particles and osseointegrated implants: Histologic analysis and 10 years monitoring.

Authors:  Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho; Mariliza Comar Astolphi de Carvalho; Daniela Ponzoni
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

Review 10.  Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johan Anton Jochum Keestra; Obada Barry; Lianne de Jong; Gerhard Wahl
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.