Literature DB >> 21452952

Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard).

Jay J Van Bavel1, Dominic J Packer, William A Cunningham.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that fusiform face area (FFA) activity increases with visual expertise. We present an fMRI study showing that faces from a social category made relevant by an experimental manipulation (members of an experimentally created in-group) preferentially recruited the FFA even when they were matched in exposure to face stimuli from a less significant social category (members of an experimentally created out-group). Faces were randomly assigned to groups and fully counterbalanced so that no perceptual cues allowed participants to visually distinguish category membership. The results revealed a pattern of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard), such that the FFA was selectively engaged following the presentation of in-group compared with out-group or unaffiliated control faces even when the intergroup distinction was arbitrary, and exposure to in-group and out-group faces was equivalent and brief. In addition, individual differences in FFA activity for in-group versus out-group faces were correlated with recognition memory differences for in-group and out-group faces. The effects of group membership on the FFA were not affected by task instruction to respond to in-group or out-group members and were functionally dissociated from early visual processing in the primary visual cortex. This study provides evidence that the FFA is sensitive to top-down influences and may be involved in subordinate level (vs. superordinate level) encoding of stimuli in the absence of long-term exposure or explicit task instructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21452952     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  43 in total

1.  Is race erased? Decoding race from patterns of neural activity when skin color is not diagnostic of group boundaries.

Authors:  Kyle G Ratner; Christian Kaul; Jay J Van Bavel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Neural basis of disgust perception in racial prejudice.

Authors:  Yunzhe Liu; Wanjun Lin; Pengfei Xu; Dandan Zhang; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effects of Minimal Grouping On Implicit Prejudice, Infrahumanization, and Neural Processing Despite Orthogonal Social Categorizations.

Authors:  Jeremy C Simon; Jennifer N Gutsell
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2019-05-06

Review 4.  Knowledge is power: how conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

5.  In-group modulation of perceptual matching.

Authors:  Zargol Moradi; Jie Sui; Miles Hewstone; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

6.  The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in social categorization.

Authors:  Pascal Molenberghs; Samantha Morrison
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Is social categorization based on relational ingroup/outgroup opposition? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Shkurko
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Their pain is not our pain: brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals.

Authors:  Ruben T Azevedo; Emiliano Macaluso; Alessio Avenanti; Valerio Santangelo; Valentina Cazzato; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Putting a face in its place: in- and out-group membership alters the N170 response.

Authors:  Xin Zheng; Sidney J Segalowitz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Economic scarcity alters the perception of race.

Authors:  Amy R Krosch; David M Amodio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.