Literature DB >> 21452918

The Circadian Energy Scale (CIRENS): two simple questions for a reliable chronotype measurement based on energy.

Gustavo L Ottoni1, Eduardo Antoniolli, Diogo R Lara.   

Abstract

This study presents the Circadian Energy Scale (CIRENS), a very short and simple chronotype measurement tool based on energy. The CIRENS consists of two introspective questions about the usual energy level (very low, low, moderate, high, or very high, scored 1 to 5) in the morning and in the evening. The difference between energy level scores (-4 to 4) felt by respondents in the evening and morning defines the chronotype score and classification. A concurrent validity analysis of the CIRENS with the widely used Horne and Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was conducted using a sample of 225 college students, and with MSFsc, a sleep-based chronotype assessment tool based on the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), using a sample of 34,530 subjects (18-83 yrs, 27% males). This large sample was collected in a Web survey for behavioral correlates of the CIRENS with variables previously associated with chronotype differences. The correlation of the CIRENS chronotype score was r = -.70 with the MEQ and r = .32 with the MSFsc. CIRENS chronotype scores declined with age and were not affected by sex. Both CIRENS and MSFsc chronotype scores were related to differences in tobacco, caffeine, and cola soft-drink consumption (all higher in evening types). The CIRENS provides a simple chronotype index and a measure of absolute energy throughout the day and seems to be a reliable chronotype assessment tool that may be useful both clinically and for large-scale studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21452918     DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2011.553696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  6 in total

1.  Sedation versus protective stabilization for dental treatment of children with caries and challenging behavior at the dentist (CHOOSE): a study protocol for a non-randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gabriela Seabra da Silva; Anna Alice Anabuki; Karolline Alves Viana; Patricia Corrêa-Faria; Mônica Maia Moterane; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Paulo Sucasas Costa; Marie Therese Hosey; Daniela Prócida Raggio; Luciane Rezende Costa
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Individual variation in contagious yawning susceptibility is highly stable and largely unexplained by empathy or other known factors.

Authors:  Alex J Bartholomew; Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Factors affecting pitch discrimination performance in a cohort of extensively phenotyped healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Lauren M Smith; Alex J Bartholomew; Lauren E Burnham; Barbara Tillmann; Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Analysis of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors Influencing Timing and Time Perception.

Authors:  Alex J Bartholomew; Warren H Meck; Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Individual Differences in Scotopic Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity: Genetic and Non-Genetic Influences.

Authors:  Alex J Bartholomew; Eleonora M Lad; Dingcai Cao; Michael Bach; Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Factorial Structure of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale (MESSi) and Sex and Age Invariance.

Authors:  Paula Vagos; Pedro F S Rodrigues; Josefa N S Pandeirada; Ali Kasaeian; Corina Weidenauer; Carlos F Silva; Christoph Randler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.