Literature DB >> 21452737

Modification of Kirchhoff migration with variable sound speed and attenuation for acoustic imaging of media and application to tomographic imaging of the breast.

Steven Schmidt1, Nebojsa Duric, Cuiping Li, Olivier Roy, Zhi-Feng Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of improving cross-sectional reflection imaging of the breast using refractive and attenuation corrections derived from ultrasound tomography data.
METHODS: The authors have adapted the planar Kirchhoff migration method, commonly used in geophysics to reconstruct reflection images, for use in ultrasound tomography imaging of the breast. Furthermore, the authors extended this method to allow for refractive and attenuative corrections. Using clinical data obtained with a breast imaging prototype, the authors applied this method to generate cross-sectional reflection images of the breast that were corrected using known distributions of sound speed and attenuation obtained from the same data.
RESULTS: A comparison of images reconstructed with and without the corrections showed varying degrees of improvement. The sound speed correction resulted in sharpening of detail, while the attenuation correction reduced the central darkening caused by path length dependent losses. The improvements appeared to be greatest when dense tissue was involved and the least for fatty tissue. These results are consistent with the expectation that denser tissues lead to both greater refractive effects and greater attenuation.
CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional ultrasound techniques use time-gain control to correct for attenuation gradients, these corrections lead to artifacts because the true attenuation distribution is not known. The use of constant sound speed leads to additional artifacts that arise from not knowing the sound speed distribution. The authors show that in the context of ultrasound tomography, it is possible to construct reflection images of the breast that correct for inhomogeneous distributions of both sound speed and attenuation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21452737      PMCID: PMC3045413          DOI: 10.1118/1.3539552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment.

Authors:  Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Alex Babkin; David Chambers; Stephen Azevedo; Roman Pevzner; Mikhail Tokarev; Earle Holsapple; Olsi Rama; Robert Duncan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype.

Authors:  Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lou Poulo; Alex Babkin; Roman Pevzner; Earle Holsapple; Olsi Rama; Carri Glide
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Propagation and backpropagation for ultrasonic wavefront design.

Authors:  D L Liu; R C Waag
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  A T Stavros; D Thickman; C L Rapp; M A Dennis; S H Parker; G A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound.

Authors:  P L Carson; C R Meyer; A L Scherzinger; T V Oughton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lianjie Huang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging with a ring transducer array: preliminary ex vivo results.

Authors:  Xiaolei Qu; Takashi Azuma; Takeshi Yogi; Shiho Azuma; Hideki Takeuchi; Satoshi Tamano; Shu Takagi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Acoustic beam anomalies in automated breast imaging.

Authors:  Rungroj Jintamethasawat; Xiaohui Zhang; Paul L Carson; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-12

3.  Breast ultrasound tomography versus MRI for clinical display of anatomy and tumor rendering: preliminary results.

Authors:  Bryan Ranger; Peter J Littrup; Nebojsa Duric; Priti Chandiwala-Mody; Cuiping Li; Steven Schmidt; Jessica Lupinacci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Frequency domain ultrasound waveform tomography: breast imaging using a ring transducer.

Authors:  G Y Sandhu; C Li; O Roy; S Schmidt; N Duric
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.