Literature DB >> 21452691

Point/counterpoint. It is still necessary to validate each individual IMRT treatment plan with dosimetric measurements before delivery.

J Charles Smith1, Sonja Dieterich, Colin G Orton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21452691     DOI： 10.1118/1.3512801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN： 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Fiducial detection and registration for 3D IMRT QA with organ-specific dose information.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Wang; Olga Dona; Yuanguang Xu; John Adamovics; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Parallel/Opposed: IMRT QA using treatment log files is superior to conventional measurement-based method.

Authors:  Nathan Childress; Quan Chen; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Validation of a modern second-check dosimetry system using a novel verification phantom.

Authors:  Daniel G McDonald; Dustin J Jacqmin; Christopher J Mart; Nicholas C Koch; Jean L Peng; Michael S Ashenafi; Mario A Fugal; Kenneth N Vanek
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.

Authors:  Baozhou Sun; Dharanipathy Rangaraj; Sunita Boddu; Murty Goddu; Deshan Yang; Geethpriya Palaniswaamy; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Omar Wooten; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.

Authors:  Christina E Agnew; Denise M Irvine; Conor K McGarry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.