Literature DB >> 21451748

The effects of a local negative feedback function between choice and relative reinforcer rate.

Michael Davison1, Douglas Elliffe, M Jackson Marr.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained on two-key concurrent variable-interval schedules with no changeover delay. In Phase 1, relative reinforcers on the two alternatives were varied over five conditions from .1 to .9. In Phases 2 and 3, we instituted a molar feedback function between relative choice in an interreinforcer interval and the probability of reinforcers on the two keys ending the next interreinforcer interval. The feedback function was linear, and was negatively sloped so that more extreme choice in an interreinforcer interval made it more likely that a reinforcer would be available on the other key at the end of the next interval. The slope of the feedback function was -1 in Phase 2 and -3 in Phase 3. We varied relative reinforcers in each of these phases by changing the intercept of the feedback function. Little effect of the feedback functions was discernible at the local (interreinforcer interval) level, but choice measured at an extended level across sessions was strongly and significantly decreased by increasing the negative slope of the feedback function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice; dynamics; feedback function; keypeck; pigeon; relative reinforcer rate

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21451748      PMCID: PMC2929085          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

1.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

3.  Quantitative prediction and molar description of the environment.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1989

4.  Molecular maximizing characterizes choice on Vaughan's (1981) procedure.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J M Ziriax
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Feedback functions for variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Nevin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Sensitivity of time allocation to an overall reinforcer rate feedback function in concurrent interval schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Kerr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.