Literature DB >> 21451428

Evaluation of a customized acoustical stimulus system in the treatment of chronic tinnitus.

Jack J Wazen1, Julie Daugherty, Karen Pinsky, Craig W Newman, Sharon Sandridge, Robert Battista, Patricia Ramos, William Luxford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a customized acoustical stimulus (Neuromonics) system in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. STUDY
DESIGN: Multi-institutional prospective.
SETTING: Nine U.S. Tertiary Otological referral centers; ambulatory. PATIENTS: Fifty-two adults with chronic tinnitus for a minimum of 6 months, with poor or no response to previous treatments, and not undergoing concomitant therapies were enrolled.
INTERVENTIONS: Treatment was delivered in 2 stages: Stage 1 consisted of stimulation with the patient-customized musical tracks and white noise masking of the tinnitus for 2 months, 2 to 4 hours a day. Stage 2 consisted of listening to the same tracks, with no tinnitus masking for 4 months. Both phases included education, cognitive therapy, and periodic follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment response was measured through validated psychometric testing: the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Other measures included the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale and loudness discomfort levels.
RESULTS: Patients' responses were recorded from 38 patients at 6 months, 28 patients at 12 months, and 12 patients at 24 months after initiation of treatment. A total of 14 patients withdrew or were lost to follow-up, and the rest had not reached the 12- or 24-month testing interval. The Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire score was significantly reduced in 74% of patients at 12 months and 84% of patients at 24 months. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores were significantly reduced in 77% of patients at 12 months and 50% at 24 months.
CONCLUSION: The customized acoustical stimulus system offers a safe and effective means of tinnitus management for patients with chronic tinnitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21451428     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318217d459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence and evidence gaps in tinnitus therapy.

Authors:  Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 2.  The state of the art of sound therapy for subjective tinnitus in adults.

Authors:  Haiyan Wang; Dongmei Tang; Yongzhen Wu; Li Zhou; Shan Sun
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Catamnesis results of an inpatient neuro-otologic and psychosomatic tinnitus therapy 1-5 years after discharge.

Authors:  H Schaaf; S Weiß; G Hesse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Sound Generator: Analysis of the Effectiveness of Noise in the Habituation of Tinnitus.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Aline Faure Cabreira; Izabella Lima de Matos; Maria Carolina Ferreira; Andressa Vital Rocha
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  Commentary: Comparison of the Long-Term Effect of Positioning the Cathode in tDCS in Tinnitus Patients.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Byungkwan Hwang; Allison Coltisor
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 6.  A State-of-the-Art Review: Personalization of Tinnitus Sound Therapy.

Authors:  Grant D Searchfield; Mithila Durai; Tania Linford
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.