Literature DB >> 21451018

Different forms of self-control share a neurocognitive substrate.

Golnaz Tabibnia1, John R Monterosso, Kate Baicy, Adam R Aron, Russell A Poldrack, Shruthi Chakrapani, Buyean Lee, Edythe D London.   

Abstract

Psychological and neurocognitive studies have suggested that different kinds of self-control may share a common psychobiological component. If this is true, performance in affective and nonaffective inhibitory control tasks in the same individuals should be correlated and should rely upon integrity of this region. To test this hypothesis, we acquired high-resolution magnetic resonance images from 44 healthy and 43 methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Individuals with methamphetamine dependence were tested because of prior findings that they suffer inhibitory control deficits. Gray matter structure of the inferior frontal gyrus was assessed using voxel-based morphometry. Subjects participated in tests of motor and affective inhibitory control (stop-signal task and emotion reappraisal task, respectively); and methamphetamine-dependent subjects provided self-reports of their craving for methamphetamine. Performance levels on the two inhibitory control tasks were correlated with one another and with gray matter intensity in the right pars opercularis region of the inferior frontal gyrus in healthy subjects. Gray matter intensity of this region was also correlated with methamphetamine craving. Compared with healthy subjects, methamphetamine-dependent subjects exhibited lower gray matter intensity in this region, worse motor inhibitory control, and less success in affect regulation. These findings suggest that self-control in different psychological domains involves a common substrate in the right pars opercularis, and that successful self-control depends on integrity of this substrate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21451018      PMCID: PMC3096483          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2859-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  51 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin card-sorting task and component processes.

Authors:  Bradley R Buchsbaum; Stephanie Greer; Wei-Li Chang; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task.

Authors:  Junichi Chikazoe; Koji Jimura; Tomoki Asari; Ken-ichiro Yamashita; Hiroki Morimoto; Satoshi Hirose; Yasushi Miyashita; Seiki Konishi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes.

Authors:  Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses.

Authors:  Nicole Swann; Nitin Tandon; Ryan Canolty; Timothy M Ellmore; Linda K McEvoy; Stephen Dreyer; Michael DiSano; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cognitive control of drug craving inhibits brain reward regions in cocaine abusers.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Joanna S Fowler; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Jean Logan; Millard Jayne; Yeming Ma; Kith Pradhan; Christopher Wong; James M Swanson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Rogier B Mars; Erie D Boorman; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 10.  The neuropsychiatry of impulsivity.

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.741

View more
  88 in total

1.  Overlapping neural substrates between intentional and incidental down-regulation of negative emotions.

Authors:  Doris E Payer; Kate Baicy; Matthew D Lieberman; Edythe D London
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-04

2.  Striatal dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Buyean Lee; Chelsea L Robertson; Golnaz Tabibnia; Andrew T Morgan; Natalie De Shetler; Amira K Brown; John R Monterosso; Adam R Aron; Mark A Mandelkern; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Bayesian neural adjustment of inhibitory control predicts emergence of problem stimulant use.

Authors:  Katia M Harlé; Jennifer L Stewart; Shunan Zhang; Susan F Tapert; Angela J Yu; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Right prefrontal and ventral striatum interactions underlying impulsive choice and impulsive responding.

Authors:  Brendan Behan; Adam Stone; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effect of modafinil on learning and task-related brain activity in methamphetamine-dependent and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Golnaz Tabibnia; John Monterosso; Gerhard Hellemann; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Behavioral inhibition in mice bred for high vs. low levels of methamphetamine consumption or sensitization.

Authors:  Travis M Moschak; Katherine A Stang; Tamara J Phillips; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Intergenerational transmission of self-regulation: A multidisciplinary review and integrative conceptual framework.

Authors:  David J Bridgett; Nicole M Burt; Erin S Edwards; Kirby Deater-Deckard
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  A unified framework for inhibitory control.

Authors:  Yuko Munakata; Seth A Herd; Christopher H Chatham; Brendan E Depue; Marie T Banich; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Christian A Rodriguez; Julie B Schweitzer; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Common prefrontal regions activate during self-control of craving, emotion, and motor impulses in smokers.

Authors:  Golnaz Tabibnia; J David Creswell; Thomas Kraynak; Cecilia Westbrook; Erica Julson; Hilary A Tindle
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.