Literature DB >> 21450746

Tacitly consenting to donate one's organs.

Govert den Hartogh1.   

Abstract

The common objection to opt-out systems of postmortal organ procurement is that they allow removal of a deceased person's organs without their actual consent. However, under certain conditions it is possible for 'silence'--failure to register any objection--conventionally and/or legally to count as genuine consent. Prominent conditions are that the consenter should be fully informed about the meaning of his or her silence and that the costs of registering dissent should be insignificant. This paper explicates this thesis and discusses some possible objections to it: (1) it cannot possibly be guaranteed that each citizen is aware of the meaning of silence; and (2) the system is slightly manipulative because it exploits a common defect in autonomous decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450746     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.038463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  What does "presumed consent" might presume? Preservation measures and uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death.

Authors:  Pablo de Lora
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-08

Review 2.  Increasing the pool of deceased donor organs for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 28.314

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.