BACKGROUND: Many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) fail to attend cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary events because they lack motivation to exercise. Theory-based approaches to promote physical activity among non-participants in cardiac rehabilitation are required. DESIGN: A randomized trial comparing physical activity levels at baseline, 6, and 12 months between a motivational counselling (MC) intervention group and a usual care (UC) control group. METHOD: One hundred and forty-one participants hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes not planning to attend cardiac rehabilitation were recruited at a single centre and randomized to eitherMC (n = 69) or UC (n = 72). The MC intervention, designed from an ecological perspective, included one face-to-face contact and eight telephone contacts with a trained physiotherapist over a 52-week period. The UC group received written information about starting a walking programme and brief physical activity advice from their attending cardiologist. Physical activity was measured by: 7-day physical activity recall interview; self-report questionnaire; and pedometer at baseline, 6, and 12 months after randomization. RESULTS: Latent growth curve analyses, which combined all three outcome measures into a single latent construct, showed that physical activity increased more over time in the MC versus the UC group (µ(add) = 0.69, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Patients with CAD not participating in cardiac rehabilitation receiving atheory-based motivational counselling intervention were more physically active at follow-up than those receiving usual care. This intervention may extend the reach of cardiac rehabilitation by increasing physical activity in those disinclined to participate in structured programmes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) fail to attend cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary events because they lack motivation to exercise. Theory-based approaches to promote physical activity among non-participants in cardiac rehabilitation are required. DESIGN: A randomized trial comparing physical activity levels at baseline, 6, and 12 months between a motivational counselling (MC) intervention group and a usual care (UC) control group. METHOD: One hundred and forty-one participants hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes not planning to attend cardiac rehabilitation were recruited at a single centre and randomized to either MC (n = 69) or UC (n = 72). The MC intervention, designed from an ecological perspective, included one face-to-face contact and eight telephone contacts with a trained physiotherapist over a 52-week period. The UC group received written information about starting a walking programme and brief physical activity advice from their attending cardiologist. Physical activity was measured by: 7-day physical activity recall interview; self-report questionnaire; and pedometer at baseline, 6, and 12 months after randomization. RESULTS: Latent growth curve analyses, which combined all three outcome measures into a single latent construct, showed that physical activity increased more over time in the MC versus the UC group (µ(add) = 0.69, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Patients with CAD not participating in cardiac rehabilitation receiving a theory-based motivational counselling intervention were more physically active at follow-up than those receiving usual care. This intervention may extend the reach of cardiac rehabilitation by increasing physical activity in those disinclined to participate in structured programmes.
Authors: Robert D Reid; Lisa A McDonnell; Dana L Riley; Amy E Mark; Lori Mosca; Louise Beaton; Sophia Papadakis; Chris M Blanchard; Heidi Mochari-Greenberger; Patricia O'Farrell; George A Wells; Monika E Slovinec D'Angelo; Andrew L Pipe Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Tessa A Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij; Suzan Jw Robroek; Sui Wai Ling; Joost van Rosmalen; Elisabeth Fc van Rossum; Alex Burdorf; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Chul Kim; Jidong Sung; Jong Hwa Lee; Won Seok Kim; Goo Joo Lee; Sungju Jee; Il Young Jung; Ueon Woo Rah; Byung Ok Kim; Kyoung Hyo Choi; Bum Sun Kwon; Seung Don Yoo; Heui Je Bang; Hyung Ik Shin; Yong Wook Kim; Heeyoune Jung; Eung Ju Kim; Jung Hwan Lee; In Hyun Jung; Jae Seung Jung; Jong Young Lee; Jae Young Han; Eun Young Han; Yu Hui Won; Woosik Han; Sora Baek; Kyung Lim Joa; Sook Joung Lee; Ae Ryoung Kim; So Young Lee; Jihee Kim; Hee Eun Choi; Byeong Ju Lee; Soon Kim Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Sabina Alexandra Cojocariu; Alexandra Maștaleru; Radu Andy Sascău; Cristian Stătescu; Florin Mitu; Elena Cojocaru; Laura Mihaela Trandafir; Maria-Magdalena Leon-Constantin Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-05-21
Authors: M Sunamura; N Ter Hoeve; H J G van den Berg-Emons; M Haverkamp; K Redekop; M L Geleijnse; H J Stam; E Boersma; R T van Domburg Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.380