Literature DB >> 21450366

World Health Organization-recommended hand-rub formulations do not meet European efficacy requirements for surgical hand disinfection in five minutes.

G Kampf1, C Ostermeyer.   

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended two hand-rub formulations for local production based on 80% ethanol or 75% isopropanol (both v/v). We have looked at their efficacy according to EN 12791. Twenty-six subjects treated their hands with the reference procedure (n-propanol, 60%) for 3 min or with one of the two formulations for 1.5, 3 or 5 min (Latin square design). Post-values (immediate effect) were taken from one hand, the other hand was gloved for 3 h. After the glove had been taken off, the second post-value was taken (3 h effect). The mean log(10) reduction of each hand rub at all three application times was compared to Hodges and Lehmann's reference procedure for non-inferiority. In the first block the reference procedure reduced bacterial load by 2.43 log(10) (immediate effect) and 2.22 log(10) (3 h effect). The efficacy of the ethanol-based formulation (e.g. immediate efficacy of 1.41 log(10) at 5 min) was inferior to the reference procedure at all application times [lower 95% confidence interval (CI): less than -0.75]. In the second block the reference procedure reduced bacterial load by 2.72 log(10) (immediate effect) and 2.26 log(10) (3 h effect). The efficacy of the isopropanol-based formulation (e.g. immediate efficacy of 2.05 log(10) at 5 min) was also inferior to the reference procedure at all application times (lower 95% CI: less than -0.75). Both WHO-recommended hand-rub formulations failed to meet the EN 12791 efficacy requirements for surgical hand disinfection within 5 min. A higher concentration of the active ingredients may improve the efficacy.
Copyright © 2011 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450366     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of an alcohol-based hand rub and water-based chlorhexidine gluconate scrub technique for hand antisepsis prior to elective surgery in horses.

Authors:  Eduardo Almeida da Silveira; Kirstin A Bubeck; Edisleidy Rodriguez Batista; Perrine Piat; Sheila Laverty; Guy Beauchamp; Marie Archambault; Yvonne Elce
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Effectiveness of three surgical alcohol-based hand rubs on skin flora.

Authors:  Mitra Zandiyeh; Ghodratollah Roshanaei
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

3.  Virucidal activity of Formulation I of the World Health Organization's alcohol-based handrubs: impact of changes in key ingredient levels and test parameters.

Authors:  Jochen Steinmann; Britta Becker; Birte Bischoff; Thomas Magulski; Joerg Steinmann; Eike Steinmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  COVID-19-associated shortage of alcohol-based hand rubs, face masks, medical gloves, and gowns: proposal for a risk-adapted approach to ensure patient and healthcare worker safety.

Authors:  G Kampf; S Scheithauer; S Lemmen; P Saliou; M Suchomel
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Evaluation of World Health Organization-Recommended Hand Hygiene Formulations.

Authors:  Miranda Suchomel; Maren Eggers; Steffen Maier; Axel Kramer; Stephanie J Dancer; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 6.883

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.