Literature DB >> 21450261

Service use and costs of incident femoral fractures in nursing home residents in Germany: the Bavarian Fall and Fracture Prevention Project (BF2P2).

Sven Heinrich1, Kilian Rapp, Ulrich Rissmann, Clemens Becker, Hans-Helmut König.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hip fractures are one of the most costly consequences of falls in the elderly. Despite their increased risk of falls and fractures, nursing home residents are often neglected in service utilization and costing studies. The purpose of this study was to determine service use, initial and long-term direct costs of incident femoral fractures in nursing home residents 65 years or older in Germany.
DESIGN: An incidence-based, bottom-up cost-of-illness study aiming at measuring fracture-related direct costs from a payer perspective was conducted.
SETTING: Nursing homes PARTICIPANTS: The retrospective dataset included all insurants of a sickness fund (Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Bavaria), who were 65 years or older, resided in a nursing home, and had a level of care of at least one in the statutory long-term care insurance (n = 60,091). MEASUREMENTS: Incident femoral fractures (ICD-10, S72) in 2006 were followed until the end of 2008, incorporating service use and costs of inpatient care (up to 12 months after the initial hospitalization episode), nursing home care (until death or the end of 2008), and ambulatory care (pharmaceuticals, nonphysician providers, and medical supply within 3 months after the initial hospitalization episode). Additional costs for nursing home and ambulatory care were determined with a before/after design. Costs beyond the year 2006 were discounted with a rate of 5%. Sensitivity analyses on key parameters were performed.
RESULTS: Overall mean direct costs of 9488 USD (SD ± 4453 USD, 2006) occurred for incident femoral fractures (n = 1525). This included inpatient care (90.2%), additional costs for nursing home care (7.1%), and ambulatory care (2.7%). Eighty-seven percent of the costs occurred for the initial hospitalization episode and 13% for long-term costs. After the index admission, 12.1% were admitted to a rehabilitation facility, 4.1% were rehospitalized within a year, and in 17.7% the level of care increased within 90 days after the end of the initial hospital episode. The share of residents with incident femoral fractures rehospitalized was significantly higher and costs for nonphysician providers were significantly lower for male residents.
CONCLUSION: Residents with femoral fractures used a wide range of health services. Our study underestimates the true costs to society in Germany. Efforts should be directed to economic evaluations of fall-prevention programs aiming at reducing fall-related fractures including femoral fractures.
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450261     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  11 in total

1.  [Fall and fracture prevention based on the National Expert Standard. Implementation and costs in a real world setting in nursing homes].

Authors:  S Heinrich; I Weigelt; K Rapp; C Becker; U Rissmann; H-H König
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  [Comparison of rehabilitation between in-hospital geriatric departments and geriatric out-of-hospital rehabilitation facilities. Analysis of routine data using the example of femur fractures].

Authors:  S Abbas; P Ihle; R Hein; I Schubert
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  What happens to patients when they fracture their hip during a skilled nursing facility stay?

Authors:  Natalie E Leland; Pedro Gozalo; Julie Bynum; Vincent Mor; Thomas J Christian; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  [Sensor-based fall detection and prediction].

Authors:  M Marschollek; C Becker
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention program in nursing homes.

Authors:  S Heinrich; K Rapp; N Stuhldreher; U Rissmann; C Becker; H-H König
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fracture prevention program for elderly people admitted to nursing homes.

Authors:  Dirk Müller; Lisa Borsi; Claudia Stracke; Stephanie Stock; Björn Stollenwerk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-13

7.  An Outreach Rehabilitation Program for Nursing Home Residents After Hip Fracture May Be Cost-Saving.

Authors:  Lauren A Beaupre; Doug Lier; Jay S Magaziner; C Allyson Jones; D William C Johnston; Donna M Wilson; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Total hospital stay for hip fracture: measuring the variations due to pre-fracture residence, rehabilitation, complications and comorbidities.

Authors:  Anthony W Ireland; Patrick J Kelly; Robert G Cumming
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Expected lifetime numbers and costs of fractures in postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis in Germany: a discrete event simulation model.

Authors:  Florian Bleibler; Kilian Rapp; Andrea Jaensch; Clemens Becker; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Falls and fractures in the elderly with sinus node disease: the impact of pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Nazmi Krasniqi; Diana Segalada; Thomas F Lüscher; Kurt Lippuner; Laurent Haegeli; Jan Steffel; Thomas Wolber; Corinna Brunckhorst; Johannes Holzmeister; David Hürlimann; Firat Duru
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 1.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.