Literature DB >> 21450254

Nursing home adverse events: further insight into highest risk periods.

Malcolm Doupe1, Marni Brownell, Phillip St John, David G Strang, Dan Chateau, Natalia Dik.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AEs) occur frequently in nursing homes (NHs). Although the literature identifies several AE risk factors, the effect of resident transition on AE risk is less well defined. This article is the first to describe how AE risk varies across several NH transition periods and to define the most vulnerable junctures of an NH stay.
METHODS: This research was conducted on the population of NH residents in Manitoba, Canada, from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2004. AEs were captured using physician-based diagnostic claims for hip fractures, other fractures, hospitalized falls, skin ulcers, and respiratory infections. AE rates were compared across several transition periods (eg, following first NH admission from hospital versus elsewhere, after NH transfer, and preceding resident death), before and after adjustment for several resident demographic, clinical, and facility-level factors.
RESULTS: Although residents (n = 22,846) spent only 6.6% of all NH days in transition, between 15.3% (skin ulcers) and 27.8% (respiratory infections) of AEs occurred during these times. Except following NH transfers, adjusted AE rates were consistently higher during all transition versus nontransition periods. Among transition periods, adjusted hip fractures, hospitalized falls, and respiratory infections were most strongly associated with resident death. Adjusted skin ulcer and non-hip fracture rates were equally highest during "pre-death" and for new residents admitted from hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: This article is the first to identify the most vulnerable times of a NH stay. For newly admitted residents, our results also show that previous exposure to a hospital environment, and not simply resident illness, at least partially contributes to increased AE risk. This and additional evidence can help clinicians and administrators to better identify periods of high risk for NH residents, and also to develop more targeted care improvement strategies. More robust and frequently obtained measures of resident illness are required to further examine these issues in more detail.
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450254     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  4 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D supplementation in older adults: searching for specific guidelines in nursing homes.

Authors:  Y Rolland; P de Souto Barreto; G Abellan Van Kan; C Annweiler; O Beauchet; H Bischoff-Ferrari; G Berrut; H Blain; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; G Duque; M Ferry; O Guerin; O Hanon; B Lesourd; J Morley; A Raynaud-Simon; G Ruault; J-C Souberbielle; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Trajectories Over the First Year of Long-Term Care Nursing Home Residence.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Addie Middleton; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.669

3.  Who is looking after Mom and Dad? Unregulated workers in Canadian long-term care homes.

Authors:  Carole A Estabrooks; Janet E Squires; Heather L Carleton; Greta G Cummings; Peter G Norton
Journal:  Can J Aging       Date:  2014-12-19

4.  How well does the minimum data set measure healthcare use? a validation study.

Authors:  Malcolm B Doupe; Jeff Poss; Peter G Norton; Allan Garland; Natalia Dik; Shauna Zinnick; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.