BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Astrocytes of the mouse neocortex express functional NMDA receptors, which are not blocked by Mg(2+) ions. However, the pharmacological profile of glial NMDA receptors and their subunit composition is far from complete. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We tested the sensitivity of NMDA receptor-mediated currents to the novel GluN2C/D subunit-selective antagonist UBP141 in mouse cortical astrocytes and neurons. We also examined the effect of memantine, an antagonist that has substantially different affinities for GluN2A/B and GluN2C/d-containing receptors in physiological concentrations of extracellular Mg(2+). KEY RESULTS: UBP141 had a strong inhibitory action on NMDA receptor-mediated transmembrane currents in the cortical layer II/III astrocytes with an IC(50) of 2.29 µM and a modest inhibitory action on NMDA-responses in the pyramidal neurons with IC(50) of 19.8 µM. Astroglial and neuronal NMDA receptors exhibited different sensitivities to memantine with IC(50) values of 2.19 and 10.8 µM, respectively. Consistent with pharmacological differences between astroglial and neuronal NMDA receptors, NMDA receptors in astrocytes showed lower Ca(2+) permeability than neuronal receptors with P(Ca) /P(Na) ratio of 3.4. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The biophysical and pharmacological properties of the astrocytic NMDA receptors strongly suggest that they have a tri-heteromeric structure composed of GluN1, GluN2C/D and GluN3 subunits. The substantial difference between astroglial and neuronal NMDA receptors in their sensitivity to UBP141 and memantine may enable selective modulation of astrocytic signalling that could be very helpful for elucidating the mechanisms of neuron-glia communications. Our results may also provide the basis for the development of novel therapeutic agents specifically targeting glial signalling.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Astrocytes of the mouse neocortex express functional NMDA receptors, which are not blocked by Mg(2+) ions. However, the pharmacological profile of glial NMDA receptors and their subunit composition is far from complete. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We tested the sensitivity of NMDA receptor-mediated currents to the novel GluN2C/D subunit-selective antagonist UBP141 in mouse cortical astrocytes and neurons. We also examined the effect of memantine, an antagonist that has substantially different affinities for GluN2A/B and GluN2C/d-containing receptors in physiological concentrations of extracellular Mg(2+). KEY RESULTS:UBP141 had a strong inhibitory action on NMDA receptor-mediated transmembrane currents in the cortical layer II/III astrocytes with an IC(50) of 2.29 µM and a modest inhibitory action on NMDA-responses in the pyramidal neurons with IC(50) of 19.8 µM. Astroglial and neuronal NMDA receptors exhibited different sensitivities to memantine with IC(50) values of 2.19 and 10.8 µM, respectively. Consistent with pharmacological differences between astroglial and neuronal NMDA receptors, NMDA receptors in astrocytes showed lower Ca(2+) permeability than neuronal receptors with P(Ca) /P(Na) ratio of 3.4. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The biophysical and pharmacological properties of the astrocytic NMDA receptors strongly suggest that they have a tri-heteromeric structure composed of GluN1, GluN2C/D and GluN3 subunits. The substantial difference between astroglial and neuronal NMDA receptors in their sensitivity to UBP141 and memantine may enable selective modulation of astrocytic signalling that could be very helpful for elucidating the mechanisms of neuron-glia communications. Our results may also provide the basis for the development of novel therapeutic agents specifically targeting glial signalling.
Authors: Jon E Chatterton; Marc Awobuluyi; Louis S Premkumar; Hiroto Takahashi; Maria Talantova; Yeonsook Shin; Jiankun Cui; Shichun Tu; Kevin A Sevarino; Nobuki Nakanishi; Gang Tong; Stuart A Lipton; Dongxian Zhang Journal: Nature Date: 2002-01-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yasnory F Sasaki; Thomas Rothe; Louis S Premkumar; Saumya Das; Jiankun Cui; Maria V Talantova; Hon-Kit Wong; Xiandi Gong; Shing Fai Chan; Dongxian Zhang; Nobuki Nakanishi; Nikolaus J Sucher; Stuart A Lipton Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Cendra Agulhon; Jeremy Petravicz; Allison B McMullen; Elizabeth J Sweger; Suzanne K Minton; Sarah R Taves; Kristen B Casper; Todd A Fiacco; Ken D McCarthy Journal: Neuron Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: C Nolte; M Matyash; T Pivneva; C G Schipke; C Ohlemeyer; U K Hanisch; F Kirchhoff; H Kettenmann Journal: Glia Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: Daniel T Monaghan; Mark W Irvine; Blaise Mathias Costa; Guangyu Fang; David E Jane Journal: Neurochem Int Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Lauren L Jantzie; Delia M Talos; Michele C Jackson; Hyun-Kyung Park; Dionne A Graham; Mirna Lechpammer; Rebecca D Folkerth; Joseph J Volpe; Frances E Jensen Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Vladimir Parpura; Elizabeth S Fisher; James D Lechleiter; Arne Schousboe; Helle S Waagepetersen; Sylvain Brunet; Selva Baltan; Alexei Verkhratsky Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Simon Höft; Stephanie Griemsmann; Gerald Seifert; Christian Steinhäuser Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2014-10-19 Impact factor: 6.237