Literature DB >> 21449845

GenoType® MTBDRplus compared with conventional drug-susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a low-resistance locale.

Zoe Gitti1, Elpis Mantadakis, Sofia Maraki, George Samonis.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Geno Type® MTBDRplus compared with conventional proportional method (PM) drug susceptibility testing (DST) for detecting drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) clinical isolates derived from the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
METHODS: All MTB clinical isolates obtained between January 2000 and May 2009 were tested prospectively using the PM DST. All isolates were also tested either prospectively (strains isolated after January 2006; n = 140) or retrospectively (January 2000-December 2005; n = 81) using MTBDRplus.
RESULTS: Among the 221 MTB isolates tested, 19 were resistant to isoniazid based on PM DST. The MTBDRplus assay identified 18 INH-resistant strains. Of these, 12 strains gave positive hybridization results with the mutation-specific probe katG Ser315Thr. The other six INH-resistant strains carried the mutation 15C→T in the inhA promoter region. One INH-sensitive strain, as determined by PM DST, had a katG gene mutation. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MTBDRplus for INH were 89.5, 99.5, 94.7 and 99%, respectively. The single rifampicin-resistant strain that was also the only multidrug resistance isolate gave a positive hybridization result with the mutation-specific probe MUT1: D516V, which confers resistance to rifampicin.
CONCLUSION: Despite the advantages of MTBDRplus (turn-around time of only 1 working day) compared with PM DST, the latter is still required in every case of a MTB clinical isolate, as the molecular assay does not detect 100% of drug resistance, especially INH resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21449845     DOI: 10.2217/fmb.11.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Microbiol        ISSN: 1746-0913            Impact factor:   3.165


  5 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis disease in children: systematic review and global estimates.

Authors:  Helen E Jenkins; Arielle W Tolman; Courtney M Yuen; Jonathan B Parr; Salmaan Keshavjee; Carlos M Pérez-Vélez; Marcello Pagano; Mercedes C Becerra; Ted Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Courtney M Yuen; Arielle W Tolman; Ted Cohen; Jonathan B Parr; Salmaan Keshavjee; Mercedes C Becerra
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Performance of Four Transport and Storage Systems for Molecular Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Marie Sylvianne Rabodoarivelo; Bélen Imperiale; Rina Andrianiavomikotroka; Angela Brandao; Parveen Kumar; Sarman Singh; Lucilaine Ferrazoli; Nora Morcillo; Voahangy Rasolofo; Juan Carlos Palomino; Peter Vandamme; Anandi Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Combination of commercially available molecular assays and culture based methods in diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Lamprini Gkaravela; Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris; Antigoni Foka; Fevronia Kolonitsiou; Anastasia Spiliopoulou; Nikolaos Charokopos; Apostolos Voulgaridis; Maria Tsiamita; Markos Marangos; Evangelos D Anastassiou; Iris Spiliopoulou
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 5.  Accuracy of line probe assays for the diagnosis of pulmonary and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana; Patrick G T Cudahy; Samuel G Schumacher; Karen R Steingart; Madhukar Pai; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 16.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.