Literature DB >> 21448899

The impact of amount of bone resection on uncemented prosthesis failure in patients with a distal femoral tumor.

Won Seok Song1, Chang-Bae Kong, Dae-Geun Jeon, Wan Hyeong Cho, Jung Ryul Kim, Yool Cho, Soo-Yong Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous reports on the correlation between the amount of bone resection and prosthetic failure might be confounded by variability in the amount of soft tissue resected and by the mode of prosthesis fixation.
METHODS: We analyzed 117 patients who underwent intra-articular resection and cementless modular tumor prosthetic reconstruction for a distal femoral tumor. Mean follow-up duration was 95 months (range, 15-271 months). Associations between the prognostic variables and prosthesis survival were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for resection percentage to predict prosthetic failure.
RESULTS: Prostheses were removed in 35 (30%) patients for; infection (17), local recurrence (5), loosening (7), stem fracture (4), or periprosthetic fracture (2). The 10-year prosthetic survivals of the 117 implants were 65.2 ± 5.4%. A percentage bone resection (>40%) was found to be associated with mechanical prosthesis failure by multivariate analysis (P = 0.003). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that an optimal cut-off point of 43% for resection percentage had a sensitivity of 95.9% and a specificity of 45.5% for predicting mechanical prosthesis failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Infection is the major cause of prosthetic failure, and amount of bone resection is negatively correlated with implant longevity.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21448899     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

1.  Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Thornley; Matias Vicente; Austin MacDonald; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert; Roberto Velez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Risk factors and management strategies for early and late infections following reconstruction with special tumour endoprostheses].

Authors:  V Janz; J Löchel; A Trampuz; K-D Schaser; A Hofer; G I Wassilew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  What Are the Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Compressive Endoprosthetic Osseointegration of the Femur with a Minimum 10-year Follow-up Period?

Authors:  John Groundland; Jeffrey M Brown; Michael Monument; Nicholas Bernthal; Kevin B Jones; R Lor Randall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  [Non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction for bone defect after tumor resection in lower extremities].

Authors:  Yuan Li; Hairong Xu; Huachao Shan; Yang Sun; Zhen Huang; Xiaohui Niu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-15

5.  Radiographic Assessment of Aseptic Loosening of Tumor-Type Knee Prosthesis in Distal Femur.

Authors:  Zi-Ming Li; Xiu-Chun Yu; Kai Zheng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Deep infection in tumor endoprosthesis around the knee: a multi-institutional study by the Japanese musculoskeletal oncology group.

Authors:  Takeshi Morii; Hideo Morioka; Takafumi Ueda; Nobuhito Araki; Nobuyuki Hashimoto; Akira Kawai; Kazuo Mochizuki; Shoichi Ichimura
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Uncemented, curved, short endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction: early follow-up outcomes.

Authors:  Minxun Lu; Jie Wang; Cong Xiao; Fan Tang; Li Min; Yong Zhou; Wenli Zhang; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.