Literature DB >> 21448623

Immunotoxicity and disease resistance in Japanese quail (Corturnix coturnix japonica) exposed to malathion.

S Nain1, A Bour, C Chalmers, J E G Smits.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of malathion on the immune system of wild birds, using Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) as a model. Quail were exposed to malathion in drinking water at environmentally realistic concentrations (0 ppm, 1 ppm, and 10 ppm). In the fifth week, several arms of the immune response were tested using the T-cell based phytohemagglutinin (PHA) skin test, the B-cell mediated antibody response, and the chemiluminescence assay measuring innate immunity. After the sixth week of malathion exposure, quail were challenged with E. coli O2. The bursa of Fabricius and the spleen were assessed for histopathology. No clinical signs of malathion toxicity were observed. Morbidity or mortality subsequent to E. coli exposure tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in the high exposure group (50.0%) compared to the control (22.2%) group. There was no difference in the innate immune response in the malathion exposed birds, however, humoral immunity was suppressed (P = 0.03) with the higher malathion exposure. Histopathological evaluation revealed an immunosuppressive effect of malathion on the bursa of Fabricius; bursal atrophy, decreased B-cell density and increased apoptosis in the medulla, and increased connective tissue thickness of the follicular epithelium. Antibody suppression was correlated with bursal changes and peripheral blood lymphocyte count, the organ and cells involved in antibody production. Following the same pattern as other immunotoxicity tests, the PHA T-cell proliferative response also tended to be suppressed in the high exposure group. This study provides evidence that subchronic, moderate malathion exposure is immunotoxic to quail and that testing integrated, functional immunity using an infectious challenge is a better predictor of immunotoxicity than individual responses to immunotoxicity tests. The secondary antibody response, circulating lymphocyte populations, and bursal histopathology were the most sensitive indicators of immune status, as these predicted decreased disease resistance with malathion exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21448623     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0657-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  20 in total

Review 1.  Pesticide use for West Nile virus.

Authors:  Howard Shapiro; Sandra Micucci
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Wildlife toxicology revisited.

Authors:  Ronald J Kendall; Philip N Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Habitat conversion and global avian biodiversity loss.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Tim M Blackburn; Kees Klein Goldewijk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Immunotoxicology: suppressive and stimulatory effects of drugs and environmental chemicals on the immune system. A discussion.

Authors:  E Gleichmann; I Kimber; I F Purchase
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  A protective effect of vitamin E and selenium in ameliorating the immunotoxicity of malathion in chicks.

Authors:  S Sodhi; A Sharma; R S Brar
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Differences in oxidative stress between young Canada geese and mallards exposed to lead-contaminated sediment.

Authors:  R Mateo; D J Hoffman
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2001-12-07

Review 7.  Small chemicals, bioactivation, and the immune system--a fragile balance of i-tox and benefits?

Authors:  Charlotte Esser; Bettina Jux
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Evaluation of the antibody mediated immune response in nestling American kestrels (Falco sparverius).

Authors:  Judit E G Smits; Raquel Baos
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  Osprey: worldwide sentinel species for assessing and monitoring environmental contamination in rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and estuaries.

Authors:  Robert A Grove; Charles J Henny; James L Kaiser
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 10.  Target organs and systems: methodologies to assess immune system function.

Authors:  M H Karol
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Stocking density: a clue for improving social behavior, welfare, health indices along with productivity performances of quail (Coturnix coturnix)-a review.

Authors:  Mohamed I El Sabry; Saber S A Hassan; Manal M Zaki; Farid K R Stino
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Natural stressors and ranavirus susceptibility in larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica).

Authors:  Brooke C Reeve; Erica J Crespi; Christopher M Whipps; Jesse L Brunner
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Effects of turmeric (Curcuma longa) and vitamin E on histopathological lesions induced in bursa of Fabricius of broiler chicks by salinomycin.

Authors:  Reza Sayrafi; Navideh Mirzakhani; Reza Mobaseri
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.054

Review 4.  Immunotoxic role of organophosphates: An unseen risk escalating SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity.

Authors:  Prem Rajak; Abhratanu Ganguly; Saurabh Sarkar; Moutushi Mandi; Moumita Dutta; Sayanti Podder; Salma Khatun; Sumedha Roy
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Population genomic data reveal genes related to important traits of quail.

Authors:  Yan Wu; Yaolei Zhang; Zhuocheng Hou; Guangyi Fan; Jinsong Pi; Shuai Sun; Jiang Chen; Huaqiao Liu; Xiao Du; Jie Shen; Gang Hu; Wenbin Chen; Ailuan Pan; Pingping Yin; Xiaoli Chen; Yuejin Pu; He Zhang; Zhenhua Liang; Jianbo Jian; Hao Zhang; Bin Wu; Jing Sun; Jianwei Chen; Hu Tao; Ting Yang; Hongwei Xiao; Huan Yang; Chuanwei Zheng; Mingzhou Bai; Xiaodong Fang; David W Burt; Wen Wang; Qingyi Li; Xun Xu; Chengfeng Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Ning Yang; Xin Liu; Jinping Du
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.