| Literature DB >> 21448153 |
J L Dominguez-Juarez1, G Kozyreff, Jordi Martorell.
Abstract
Unmarked sensitive detection of molecules is needed in environmental pollution monitoring, disease diagnosis, security screening systems and in many other situations in which a substance must be identified. When molecules are attached or adsorbed onto an interface, detecting their presence is possible using second harmonic light generation, because at interfaces the inversion symmetry is broken. However, such light generation usually requires either dense matter or a large number of molecules combined with high-power laser sources. Here we show that using high-Q spherical microresonators and low average power, between 50 and 100 small non-fluorescent molecules deposited on the outer surface of the microresonator can generate a detectable change in the second harmonic light. This generation requires phase matching in the whispering gallery modes, which we achieved using a new procedure to periodically pattern, with nanometric precision, a molecular surface monolayer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21448153 PMCID: PMC3072103 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Periodic molecular pattern on the sphere surface.
(a) Second harmonic generation from a flat-surface substrate coated with a monolayer of nonlinear molecules. The SH intensity is shown as a function of the incident position of the beam on the substrate (blue dots). The dotted blue line is only a guide for the eye. The portion in which the nonlinear activity of the molecule was destroyed with the e-beam is shaded in grey, whereas the non-coated portion is shaded in red. (b) SEM image of the microsphere used in the experiment. The periodical pattern drawn on the sphere is superimposed on the SEM image of the sphere at the same scale. The diameter of the sphere was 359 μm.
Figure 2Quasi-phased matching condition in the WGM of spheres.
Equation (1) is given as a function of the radius of the sphere and wavenumber for the fundamental wave in vacuum. The arc length is fixed to 8.8 μm at the equator.
Figure 3Experimental setup.
Schematic view of the experimental setup used for measuring the SH light generated by the nonlinear grating at the surface of the microsphere. The fibre loop is used only in the experiments in which the fundamental pulse is stretched to uniformly cover the entire perimeter of the sphere. The inset shows the polar and radial distribution of the WGM when the pulse is coupled into the microsphere (bright spot on the right). The picture was taken from a sphere doped with erbium atoms to facilitate the visibility of the WGM. The other two spots on the left correspond to images or parasitic reflections formed by the sphere of the residual light uncoupled from the taper to the sphere. PMT indicates photomultiplier tube. PD indicates photodetector. NA indicates numerical aperture.
Figure 4Quasi-phase-matched SHG in the WGM.
(a) Second harmonic generation as a function of half the wavelength of the fundamental wave when the coating solution was 2.5×10−4 M (green dots) and when the coating solution was 5×10−9 M (red dots). Experimental domain width minus the calculated coherence length at the equator as a function of half the wavelength of the fundamental wave in a logarithmic scale when the coating solution was 2.5×10−4 M (green line) and when the coating solution was 5×10−9 M (red line). The dashed lines are only a guide for the eye. The inset shows an enlarged view of the red dotted curve. The two experiments were performed using very similar spheres. The units of the vertical axis of the inset are the same as the left vertical axis of the main figure. (b) SH intensity as a function of time, using a sphere with Q=1.83×107 (blue solid line) and a sphere with Q=3.72×106 (red dotted line). Both spheres were coated with a 5.0×10−7 M solution of CV and periodically patterned to achieve the phase-matching condition. All the parameters of the experimental setup, coupling taper, input intensity and so on were kept equal. The difference in Q factor must be attributed mostly to a difference in the eccentricity, whereas the difference in radius between the two spheres was only 16%. One in the vertical scale corresponds to an intensity current of 96 μA.
Figure 5Sensitivity to molecular concentration or number.
(a) Second harmonic signal in arbitrary units (a.u.) for four different surface concentrations of nonlinear molecules when a grating was written (blue bars) and when no grating was written (red bars). In the horizontal axis, we indicate the concentration of the original solution used to prepare the monolayers. (b) Left hand side of equation (9) in which the variables correspond to the experimentally measured intensities (vertical axis). Sequence of 1-s ultraviolet (UV) flashes (horizontal axis). The background noise is subtracted from the measured intensity and then this difference is divided by the reference input intensity to ensure a unit less logarithm argument and proportionality to the molecular surface density. Two different spheres were coated with a 1.55×10−9 M solution of CV (green dots) and with a 1×10−7 M solution of CV (red dots). Given different conditions in the two experimental measurements, which use two different spheres, one should not expect the two decreasing slopes to be identical. The numbers shown by the green dots obtained using equation (7) should not be taken literally and are only indicative of the molecules that participate in the SHG before shining each ultraviolet flash. The solid lines indicate a linear adjustment to the portion of data that shows a decrease, whereas the dotted lines indicate a linear adjustment to the almost horizontal portion of the data.
SHG performance for four different lengths of the pulse-stretching fibre loop.
| SH peak (arbitrary units) | No PM peak | No PM peak | 2.246 | No PM peak |
| Pulse FWHM (ps) | 1.1 | 10.7 | 102.9 | 291.9 |
| Peak intensity FF† (%) | 12.2 | 1.3 | 0.13 | 0.046 |
| Delay‡ (ns) | 0.24 | 1.58 | 22.17 | 63.33 |
CV, crystal violet; FF, fundamental field; FWHM, full width at half maximum; PM, phase matching; SH, second harmonic.
One single sphere was used in all the measurements with Q=3.82×107, R=179 μm and CV coating concentration=1×108 M.
The first two rows correspond to experimentally measured values. The first two columns of the third row are the result of an autocorrelation measurement. The last two columns of the third row are determined using the pulse-width increase given in ref.28. The fourth row is calculated using the values measured in the previous rows. The fifth row is determined from the group velocity dispersion in fused silica fibres.
†Peak intensity of fundamental field at the taper portion of the fibre relative to the peak intensity of the incident non-stretched pulse.
‡Delay between the fundamental pulse and the portion around 400 nm of white light generated at the entrance tip of the fibre.