Literature DB >> 2144796

Efficacy and safety of quinidine therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

S E Coplen1, E M Antman, J A Berlin, P Hewitt, T C Chalmers.   

Abstract

Because individual studies evaluating the role of quinidine in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion from chronic atrial fibrillation have involved relatively few patients, a meta-analysis of randomized control trials was performed. Six trials published between 1970 and 1984 were selected by two blinded reviewers based on study design and statistical analysis. Data from these six trials involving 808 patients were pooled after testing for homogeneity of treatment effects across trials. Life table estimates of the percent of patients still in sinus rhythm at 3, 6, and 12 months after cardioversion were constructed for quinidine and control groups. The proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm in the quinidine group was 69%, 58%, and 50% at 3, 6, and 12 months postcardioversion respectively. The proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm in the control group was 45%, 33%, and 25% at the same time intervals. The pooled rate difference, or difference in proportion of patients in sinus rhythm between quinidine and control groups, was 24%, 23%, and 24% at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up (p less than 0.001 at all time intervals). The unadjusted total mortality rate in the quinidine-treated patients was 2.9% and in the control group was 0.8%. The odds of dying in the quinidine-treated group were approximately three times that of the control group ("typical" odds ratio = 2.98, p less than 0.05). Thus, quinidine treatment is more effective than no antiarrhythmic therapy in suppressing recurrences of atrial fibrillation but appears to be associated with increased total mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2144796     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  108 in total

Review 1.  In-hospital approach to newly recognized atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C D Kimmelstiel; M Homoud; C A Clyne; M Estes III
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  New devices and hybrid therapies and new devices for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R B Krol; S Saksena; A Prakash
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Pharmacological Therapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Antiarrhythmic drugs: from mechanisms to clinical practice.

Authors:  D M Roden
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Pharmacological control of rate and maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Authors:  M D Ezekowitz; R Lampert
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Implication from randomized trials of rate and rhythm controls on management of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vincent E Hagens; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Harry J G M Crijns; Isabelle C van Gelder
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Management and outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction: the GUSTO-III experience. Global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries.

Authors:  C-K Wong; H D White; R G Wilcox; D A Criger; R M Califf; E J Topol; E M Ohman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Amiodarone as a first-line drug in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: the protagonist viewpoint.

Authors:  S Lévy
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Maintaining stability of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: antiarrhythmic drugs versus ablation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; John Hynes; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; Jerry Luck
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Low-dose amiodarone should not be the first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R J Sung
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.