Killing of proliferating normal cells limits chemotherapy of cancer. Several strategies to selectively protect normal cells were previously suggested. Here we further explored the protection of normal cells from cell cycle-specific chemotherapeutic agents such as mitotic inhibitors (MI). We focused on a long-term cell recovery (rather than on a short-term cell survival) after a 3-day exposure to MI (paclitaxel and nocodazole). In three normal human cell types (RPE, NKE, WI-38t cells) but not in cancer cells with mutant p53, pre-treatment with nutlin-3a, a non-genotoxic inducer of wt p53, caused G1 and/or G2 arrest, thus preventing lethal mitotic arrest caused by MI and allowing normal cells to recover after removal of MI. Rapamycin, an inhibitor of the nutrient-sensing mTOR pathway, potentiated the protective effect of nutlin-3a in normal cells. Also, a combination of rapamycin and metformin, an anti-diabetic drug, induced G1 and G2 arrest selectively in normal cells and thereby protected them from MI. A combination of metformin and rapamycin also protected normal cells in low glucose conditions, whereas in contrast it was cytotoxic for cancer cells. Based on these data and the analysis of the literature, we suggest that a rational combination of metformin and rapamycin can potentiate chemotherapy with mitotic inhibitors against cancer, while protecting normal cells, thus further increasing the therapeutic window.
Killing of proliferating normal cells limits chemotherapy of cancer. Several strategies to selectively protect normal cells were previously suggested. Here we further explored the protection of normal cells from cell cycle-specific chemotherapeutic agents such as mitotic inhibitors (MI). We focused on a long-term cell recovery (rather than on a short-term cell survival) after a 3-day exposure to MI (paclitaxel and nocodazole). In three normal human cell types (RPE, NKE, WI-38t cells) but not in cancer cells with mutant p53, pre-treatment with nutlin-3a, a non-genotoxic inducer of wt p53, caused G1 and/or G2 arrest, thus preventing lethal mitotic arrest caused by MI and allowing normal cells to recover after removal of MI. Rapamycin, an inhibitor of the nutrient-sensing mTOR pathway, potentiated the protective effect of nutlin-3a in normal cells. Also, a combination of rapamycin and metformin, an anti-diabetic drug, induced G1 and G2 arrest selectively in normal cells and thereby protected them from MI. A combination of metformin and rapamycin also protected normal cells in low glucose conditions, whereas in contrast it was cytotoxic for cancer cells. Based on these data and the analysis of the literature, we suggest that a rational combination of metformin and rapamycin can potentiate chemotherapy with mitotic inhibitors against cancer, while protecting normal cells, thus further increasing the therapeutic window.
Microtubule-targeting agents or mitotic inhibitors are one of the cornerstones of
modern chemotherapy [1-5]. Despite different effects on microtubules and tubulin, a
variety of structures and binding sites, all microtubule-active drugs at low
concentrations kill proliferating (cycling) cells, by causing fatal mitotic arrest
[6-9]. In addition to killing cancer cells, these mitotic inhibitors (MI) can
kill normal cycling cells (bone marrow cells, hair follicles, mucosal and epithelial
cells), thus causing certain side effects. Side effects may not only be devastating,
but they also limit anticancer therapy. The goal is to protect proliferating normal
cells from the cytotoxicity of MI, without protecting cancer cells.Given that MI cannot possibly cause mitotic arrest in the cells that do not enter
mitosis, a transient G1 and/or G2 arrest (protective arrest) must protect cells from
MI. How can we cause a protective G1/G2 arrest selectively in normal cells but not
in cancer cells? Whereas all normal cells have wt p53, this tumor suppressor is
mutant or lost in 50% of cancers [10]. This
absence provides a means for selective protection of normal cells without protecting
cancer cells lacking wt p53 [11-13]. Thus, induction of p53 can arrest cells in
G1 and G2 phases, preventing their entry into mitosis. Specifically, low
concentrations of DNA damaging drugs (DDD) induce wt p53 and arrest cells in G1 and
G2, thus protecting cells from mitotic inhibitors [14-17]. In paired cell lines, DDD
protected cells with wt p53 but not cells lacking p53 and p21 [14]. However, the effects of DDD are poorly reversible. While
mitotic arrest and polyploidization were prevented (a short term protection), the
prospect on long-term cell survival and recovery of proliferation remained unclear.
Also DDD can protect some cancer cell lines lacking p53 [15]. It was given consideration from the start that less toxic
and more selective drugs should be found to induce p53 for the optimal protection of
normal cells [14].Nutlin-3a, an inhibitor of Mdm2, induces wt p53 without causing DNA damage [18, 19].
Also, its effect is strictly p53-dependent [20]. In paired and isogenic cancer cell lines (with and without wt p53),
nutlin-3a selectively protected cells with wt p53 [16, 21, 22]. Importantly, nutlin-3a provided a long-term protection
from paclitaxel to skin-derived fibroblast cell line in culture, so that cells
proliferated after removal of paclitaxel [21]. This outstanding result needed to be further confirmed in other normal
cell types including epithelial cells.Nutlin-3a is an experimental therapeutic and is not approved yet for clinical use.
Therefore, we also planned to investigate clinically approved drugs that might
protect normal cells from MI. Cancer cells are characterized by dysregulation of the
PI-3K/mTOR pathway [23-26]. It was hypothesized that the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin may
protect normal cells from cycle-dependent chemotherapy [27]. Although seemingly unrelated, a remarkable study by Longo
and co-workers showed that fasting protected mice from the toxicity of chemotherapy
[28-30] and, most importantly, abrogated side effects of chemotherapy in
patients with cancer [31]. We suggest that
protective effect of fasting may in part be due to inhibition of the
nutrient-sensing mTOR pathway in normal cells. Fasting decreases blood levels of
nutrients (glucose, amino acids), IGF-1 and insulin, which otherwise activate mTOR
in the organism [32-37].Metformin, an anti-diabetic drug, can in part substitute for fasting because it
decreases levels of glucose and insulin [38,
39]. Metformin deactivates mTOR in mice
[40]. Also, metformin inhibits the mTOR
pathway in cell culture [41-43]. Both metformin and rapalogs (rapamycin and
its analogs) are clinically approved drugs. Rapalogs are also approved for cancer
therapy [44, 45]. Metformin and rapamycin potentiate chemotherapy against cancer
[46]. Furthermore, rapalogs and metformin
in combination with chemotherapy (including MI) are undergoing clinical trials
[47-50].Here we investigated whether nutlin-3a, rapamycin, metformin and their combinations
can protect 3 normal cell types: WI-38t fibroblasts, RPE (retinal pigment
epithelial) and NKE (normal kidney epithelial) cells, without protection of
MDA-MB-231breast cancer cells with mutant p53. We investigated whether normal cells
were fully protected and recovered upon removal MI. We identified effective
combinations of rapamycin with both metformin and nutlin-3a for protection of normal
cells from MI.
RESULTS
Protection of WI-38t cells by nutlin-3a
To evaluate long-term protection, we determined cell numbers six days after
removal of mitotic inhibitors (MI) such as nocodazole and paclitaxel (Fig. 1A). We initially used nocodazole (Noco)
because it is easily removable by washing cell culture. Cells were pretreated
with nutlin-3 and the next day nocodazole was added. After 3 days of treatment
with nocodazole, cells were washed and cultured in the fresh medium for 6 days
to allow recovery of the protected cells (Fig. 1
A). Nocodazole alone decreased cell numbers more than 50-fold
compared with control in both MDA-MB-231 and WI-38t (Fig. 1B). Pretreatment with nutlin-3a did not protect MDA-MB-231
cells, but completely prevented the effects of nocodazole in WI-38t cells (Fig.
1B). Nutlin-3 caused G1 and G2 arrest
(Fig. 1C). Nocodazole arrested cells with
4N DNA content, corresponding to mitotic arrest as evidenced by mitotic/round
cells visualized on live microscopy (Fig. 1C). Pretreatment with nutlin-3a (Nu) completely prevented
nocodazole-induced mitotic arrest (Fig. 1C,
Nu+Noco). Cell cycle distributions of nutlin-pretreated cells were almost
identical with (+Noco) and without nocodazole (Fig. 1C). Thus, G1 and G2 arrest caused by nutlin-3a prevented
mitotic arrest caused by nocodazole.
Figure 1
Nutlin-3a protects cells by preventing mitotic arrest caused by
nocodazole
(A) Drug treatment schedule: MI was added 1 day after nutlin-3a. 3days
later all drugs were washed off and cells were allowed to recover for 6
d and then counted. (B) Selective protection of WI-38t, but not
MDA-MB-231 cells, from the cytotoxic effect of nocodazole. 10,000 cells
were plated per well (in 6 well plates), treated as shown in panel A and
counted after 6 days. The results are shown as % of control, in log
scale. (C) Prevention of toxic mitotic arrest by non-toxic G1 and G2
arrest. WI-38-t cells were pre-treated with 2.5 μM nutlin-3a, and
then were treated with 200 nM nocodazole. After 24 hours, cells were
microphotographed (right panel), collected and analyzed by flow
cytometry.
Nutlin-3a protects cells by preventing mitotic arrest caused by
nocodazole
(A) Drug treatment schedule: MI was added 1 day after nutlin-3a. 3days
later all drugs were washed off and cells were allowed to recover for 6
d and then counted. (B) Selective protection of WI-38t, but not
MDA-MB-231 cells, from the cytotoxic effect of nocodazole. 10,000 cells
were plated per well (in 6 well plates), treated as shown in panel A and
counted after 6 days. The results are shown as % of control, in log
scale. (C) Prevention of toxic mitotic arrest by non-toxic G1 and G2
arrest. WI-38-t cells were pre-treated with 2.5 μM nutlin-3a, and
then were treated with 200 nM nocodazole. After 24 hours, cells were
microphotographed (right panel), collected and analyzed by flow
cytometry.As expected, nutlin-3a induced p53 and p21 (Fig. 2A). Nocodazole alone induced p53 without inducing p21. This is
consistent with induction of p53 during prolonged mitotic arrest [7, 51, 52]. Isolated induction of
p53 (without induction of p21) by nocodazole is a consequence of mitotic arrest
[7, 52]. At both concentrations of nutlin-3a (2.5 μM and 10
μM), cells were completely protected from nocodazole: cell numbers were
equal after treatment with nutlin-3a alone and nutlin-3a plus nocodazole (Fig.
2B).
Figure 2
Protective induction of p53/p21 by nutlin-3a in WI-38t cells
A. Immunoblot. WI-38t cells were pre-treated with indicated
concentrations of nutlin-3a (2.5 μM and 10 μM), and then
treated with 200 nM nocodazole. The next day, cells were lysed and
immunoblot was performed as described in the Methods section.
B. 50, 000 cells were plated per well (in 6 well plates) and
treated as shown in Fig. 1A. The
results present cell numbers expressed as % of control in log scale.
Note: Cell numbers in Nutlin+Noco exceeded plated cell numbers almost
10-fold, indicating active cell proliferation after drug removal (not
shown).
Protective induction of p53/p21 by nutlin-3a in WI-38t cells
A. Immunoblot. WI-38t cells were pre-treated with indicated
concentrations of nutlin-3a (2.5 μM and 10 μM), and then
treated with 200 nM nocodazole. The next day, cells were lysed and
immunoblot was performed as described in the Methods section.B. 50, 000 cells were plated per well (in 6 well plates) and
treated as shown in Fig. 1A. The
results present cell numbers expressed as % of control in log scale.
Note: Cell numbers in Nutlin+Noco exceeded plated cell numbers almost
10-fold, indicating active cell proliferation after drug removal (not
shown).
Protection of RPE cells by nutlin-3a
Nutlin-3a also causes reversible arrest in RPE cells, so that cells could resume
proliferation after nutlin-3a was removed [53, 54]. We next investigated
whether this arrest can protect RPE cells from the toxicity of MI. Pretreatment
with nutlin-3a partially abrogated the toxicity of nocodazole and paclitaxel
(Taxol) in RPE cells but not in cancerMDA-MB-231 cells with mutant p53 (Fig.
3). The effect of paclitaxel (PTX) was
less reversible than the effect of nocodazole because PTX is poorly washable
from the cell culture.
Figure 3
Nutlin-3a protects normal retinal pigment epithelial (RPE-19) cells
but not MDA-MB-231 cells
10,000 cells were plated and treated the next day with 2.5 μM
nutlin-3a or left untreated. The next day, cells were treated with
either 200 nM nocodazole, 50 nM Taxol (paclitaxel) or left untreated.
Cells were counted 6 days after wash because control cells reached
confluence at that time. The results are shown as % of control, in log
scale. Note: Nutlin+Noco, final cell numbers exceeded plated cell
numbers, indicating cell proliferation after drug removal.
Analysis of cell cycle distribution revealed that nutlin-3a caused G2 arrest in
RPE cells (Fig. 4). As expected, nocodazole
caused mitotic arrest, which was indistinguishable from G2 arrest by flow
cytometry, but was evident by the appearance of mitotic cells (Fig. 4A, microphotographs). By arresting cells in
G2, nutlin-3a prevented mitotic arrest, thus protecting normal cells. In
contrast, nutlin-3a did not cause arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 4B). Therefore, nocodazole caused mitotic
arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells both in the presence and the absence of nutlin-3a
(Fig. 4B).
Figure 4
Nutlin-3a prevents toxic mitotic arrest by causing non-toxic G2
arrest in RPE cells
RPE (A) and MDA-MB-231 (B) cells were plated in 6-well plates at
50,000/well. Cells were either pretreated with 2.5 μM nutlin-3a
or left untreated before addition of 200 nM nocodazole. After 24 hours
treatment with nocodazole, cells were microphotographed (left panels),
collected and analyzed by flow cytometry (right panels).
Nutlin-3a protects normal retinal pigment epithelial (RPE-19) cells
but not MDA-MB-231 cells
10,000 cells were plated and treated the next day with 2.5 μM
nutlin-3a or left untreated. The next day, cells were treated with
either 200 nM nocodazole, 50 nM Taxol (paclitaxel) or left untreated.
Cells were counted 6 days after wash because control cells reached
confluence at that time. The results are shown as % of control, in log
scale. Note: Nutlin+Noco, final cell numbers exceeded plated cell
numbers, indicating cell proliferation after drug removal.
Nutlin-3a prevents toxic mitotic arrest by causing non-toxic G2
arrest in RPE cells
RPE (A) and MDA-MB-231 (B) cells were plated in 6-well plates at
50,000/well. Cells were either pretreated with 2.5 μM nutlin-3a
or left untreated before addition of 200 nM nocodazole. After 24 hours
treatment with nocodazole, cells were microphotographed (left panels),
collected and analyzed by flow cytometry (right panels).
Protection of RPE by drug combinations
Noteworthy, protection of RPE by nutlin-3a was potentiated by rapamycin, which
was slightly cytoprotective by itself (Fig. 5
A). Metformin alone was marginally protective but its effect was also
potentiated by rapamycin. A combination of metformin plus rapamycin and a
combination of nutlin-3a plus rapamycin afforded comparable protection. Similar
results were obtained in low glucose medium (Fig. 5 B).
Figure 5
Cytoprotection of RPE cells with nutlin-3a, rapamycin and metformin
10,000 RPE cells were plated in normal (1g/L) glucose medium (panel A)
and low (0.5 g/L) glucose medium (panel B)
The next day, cells were treated with either 2.5 μM nutlin-3a
(Nutlin), 1 and 3 mM metformin (M 1 and M 3), 1 nM rapamycin (R) or left
untreated. The next day, cells were treated with either 200 nM
nocodazole (Noco) or 50 nM paclitaxel (PTX). 3 days later, the cells
were washed and cultured in normal glucose for an additional 10 days and
then were counted. The results are shown as % of control (no treatment).
Note: in control cells reached confluence during the experiment.
Cytoprotection of RPE cells with nutlin-3a, rapamycin and metformin
10,000 RPE cells were plated in normal (1g/L) glucose medium (panel A)
and low (0.5 g/L) glucose medium (panel B)
The next day, cells were treated with either 2.5 μM nutlin-3a
(Nutlin), 1 and 3 mM metformin (M 1 and M 3), 1 nM rapamycin (R) or left
untreated. The next day, cells were treated with either 200 nM
nocodazole (Noco) or 50 nM paclitaxel (PTX). 3 days later, the cells
were washed and cultured in normal glucose for an additional 10 days and
then were counted. The results are shown as % of control (no treatment).
Note: in control cells reached confluence during the experiment.
Protection of WI-38t by a combination of rapamycin and metformin
Next we investigated whether a combination of rapamycin and metformin (R+M) can
protect WI-38t cells. This combination (M + R) afforded 2-3 fold protection in
WI-38t, but not in MDA-MB-231 cells (Suppl. Fig. 1). Individually, 3 mM metformin and 1 nM-100
nM rapamycin were slightly protective. Combinations of metformin with 1 nM
rapamycin were more effective (Fig. 6). We
next investigated the mechanism of cytoprotection by rapamycin plus metformin
(R+M). The combination (R+M) caused G1/G2 arrest and this partially prevented
mitotic arrest caused by nocodazole (Fig. 7). In contrast, R+M did not protect MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 7). Noteworthy, the R+M combination was toxic
to MDA-MB-231 cells cultured at low glucose (Suppl. Fig. 2).
Figure 6
Cytoprotection of WI-38t cells by combining rapamycin and metformin
10,000 WI-38t cells were plated in normal glucose medium
The next day, cells were treated with either 1 mM or 3 mM metformin (M 1
and M 3) and 1 nM or 100 nM rapamycin (R 1 and R 100) or left untreated
(control). The next day, cells were treated with 200 nM nocodazole
(Noco) as indicated. After the 3 days, the cells were washed and
cultured for an additional 10 days and then were counted. The results
are shown as % of control (no treatment). Note: in control cells reached
confluence during the experiment.
Figure 7
A combination of rapamycin and metformin prevents mitotic arrest in
WI-38t cells
50,000 WI-38t and MDA-MB-231 cells were plated in 6-well plates and
pre-treated with a combination of 100 nM rapamycin and 3 mM metformin
(R+M). The next day, cells were treated with 200 nM nocodazole. After 24
hours, cells were microphotographed (left panels), collected and flow
cytometry was performed (right panels).
Cytoprotection of WI-38t cells by combining rapamycin and metformin
10,000 WI-38t cells were plated in normal glucose medium
The next day, cells were treated with either 1 mM or 3 mM metformin (M 1
and M 3) and 1 nM or 100 nM rapamycin (R 1 and R 100) or left untreated
(control). The next day, cells were treated with 200 nM nocodazole
(Noco) as indicated. After the 3 days, the cells were washed and
cultured for an additional 10 days and then were counted. The results
are shown as % of control (no treatment). Note: in control cells reached
confluence during the experiment.
A combination of rapamycin and metformin prevents mitotic arrest in
WI-38t cells
50,000 WI-38t and MDA-MB-231 cells were plated in 6-well plates and
pre-treated with a combination of 100 nM rapamycin and 3 mM metformin
(R+M). The next day, cells were treated with 200 nM nocodazole. After 24
hours, cells were microphotographed (left panels), collected and flow
cytometry was performed (right panels).
Comparison of M+R and nutlin-3a in NKE cells
We next tested whether these combinations were protective in a third type of
normal cells. Normal kidney epithelial (NKE) cells were partially protected from
nocodazole and paclitaxel (PTX) in both normal and low glucose media.
Combinations of nutlin-3a with rapamycin (N+R), even though rapamycin alone was
not protective, were the most effective in NKE cells (Fig. 8). Combinations of metformin with rapamycin (R+M) were
moderately protective (Fig. 8).
Figure 8
Protection of NKE cells from nocodazole and paclitaxel in normal
glucose and low glucose
10,000 NKE cells were plated in either 1g/L glucose or 0.5g/L glucose
(low). Cells were pre-treated for 24 hrs with either 2.5 μM
nutlin-3a, 1 and 10 nM rapamycin (R1 and R10), 3 mM metformin (M) alone
or in combination and then were treated with either 200 nM nocodazole
(Noco) or 50 nM Taxol (PTX). After 3 days, cells were washed and
cultured for 6 days in fresh medium before counting.
Protection of NKE cells from nocodazole and paclitaxel in normal
glucose and low glucose
10,000 NKE cells were plated in either 1g/L glucose or 0.5g/L glucose
(low). Cells were pre-treated for 24 hrs with either 2.5 μM
nutlin-3a, 1 and 10 nM rapamycin (R1 and R10), 3 mM metformin (M) alone
or in combination and then were treated with either 200 nM nocodazole
(Noco) or 50 nM Taxol (PTX). After 3 days, cells were washed and
cultured for 6 days in fresh medium before counting.
DISCUSSION
The goal of chemotherapeutic cyclotherapy is selective protection of normal cells by
exploiting aberrations in cancer cell cycle such as loss of p53 [13, 55-57]. By causing G1 and G2
arrest, nutlin-3a protects cells with wt p53 from mitotic inhibitors. As a proof of
principle in paired cell lines, nutlin-3a prevented mitotic arrest, cell death or
polyploidization (a short-term protection) [16, 17, 21, 22]. Furthermore,
pretreatment with nutlin-3a allowed normal skin-derived fibroblasts to recover from
MI treatment, as measured by an increase in cell numbers after 6 days (a long-term
protection) in drug-free medium [21]. Here we
focused on a long-term protection and extended this observation to WI-38 fibroblasts
and two epithelial cell lines: RPE and NKE. As expected, nutlin-3a arrested normal
cells in both G1 and/or G2 (depending on cell type) and thus protected them from
mitotic arrest caused by MI. While affording a long-term protection to all 3 normal
cell types, nutlin-3a did not protect MDA-MB-231cancer cells in any experiments.
Similar results in normal cell lines of different origin indicate that nutlin-3a
might also protect relevant normal cells in the organism. Remarkably, Sur et
al demonstrated that oral administration of Nutlin-3 (200 mg/kg)
efficiently protected mice from neutropenia caused by a mitotic inhibitor [20]. This important result indicates that
protection in cell culture is indeed applicable to the organism.We found that rapamycin further potentiated the protective effect of nutlin-3a in
three cell lines, most robustly in NKE cells. There are two potential mechanisms.
First, rapamycin, as a mild cytostatic agent, may increase the durability of arrest,
thus potentiating the protection. Second, to be protective in a long-term, the
arrest must be reversible. Nutlin-3-induced arrest is mostly reversible in most cell
lines [58, 59]. But nutlin-3a can also induce irreversible senescence, depending on
the activity of mTOR, p53 levels and the duration of the arrest [53, 54,
60]. Rapamycin may improve the
reversibility of arrest caused by p53 [53].
We are currently investigating the mechanism of potentiation of nutlin-3a by
rapamycin (Leontieva et al, MS in preparation).Since nutlin-3a does not cause arrest in cancer cells lacking p53, the addition of
rapamycin cannot possibly potentiate nutlin-3a in cells with mutant p53. Therefore,
like nutlin-3a alone, a combination of nutlin-3a plus rapamycin (N+R) does not
protect cancer cells with mutant p53. Therefore, the combination of nutlin-3a plus
rapamycin can be used for protection of normal cells in patients having tumors with
mutant p53. In heterogeneous tumors with co-existing cells having wt and mutant p53,
the N+R combination may spare cancer cells with wt p53. This will revert the tumor
to a less aggressive phenotype, which is more sensitive to conventional
chemotherapy. Therefore, a combination of N+R+MI may be promising in heterogeneous
cancers too.It was shown that fasting, which decreases levels of glucose and insulin and
inactivates nutrient-sensing signaling pathways, decreases side-effects of
chemotherapy [29]. Like fasting, metformin,
an anti-diabetic drug, decreases glucose levels. Also, metformin lowers levels of
insulin in women with early breast cancer [38]. Furthermore, metformindecreases tumor growth in mice fed by
high-calorie diet [61, 62]. Metformin and rapamycin differently affects
nutrient-sensing pathways [63]. Therefore, 2
drugs may in theory potentiate each other. A combination of temsirolimus (an analog
of rapamycin) and metformin showed promising results in phase I clinical trial as
cancer therapy [43, 64].Here we demonstrated that a combination of rapamycin and metformin (R+M) caused
protective G1 and G2 arrest in normal cells. Furthermore, this combination provided
a long-term protection against MI in all three normal cell types. Not only did the
R+M combination not protect cancer cells but, in contrast, it was toxic by itself to
MDA-MB-231 cells in low glucose conditions. Low glucose levels are toxic to cancer
cells, which depend on glucose as substrates for their glycolytic phenotype [65-72].
Noteworthy, metformin decreases glucose levels in the organism.Metformin enhances susceptibility of p53-/- cells to apoptosis upon nutrient
deprivation [73]. In contrast, p53-proficient
cells can undergo cell cycle arrest (instead of apoptosis) in low glucose [74]. This explains selective toxicity of
metformin to p53-deficient cells in low glucose [73, 74] observed in our study
too. Thus a combination of metformin, rapamycin and fasting may be toxic to cancer
cells, while protecting normal cells from chemotherapy with MI (Fig. 9), thus increasing therapeutic window.
Concentrations of metformin (1 mM) and rapamycin (1 nM) are lower than those
achievable in patients [75-80]. We suggest that metformin and rapamycin
should be administrated for a 1-2-day period prior and simultaneously with MI such
as the Vinca drugs and Taxanes (Fig. 10). In
conclusion, based on cell culture data and analysis of the literature, we suggest
that nutlin-3a, nutlin-3a plus rapamycin and rapamycin plus metformin may extend the
therapeutic window of microtubule-active chemotherapy. Low concentrations of
rapamycin and metformin, especially combined with fasting, may be used in the clinic
today.
Figure 9
Cyclotherapy: protection of normal cells and unshielding of cancer
cells
Figure 10
Proposal for potential clinical trials
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Cell Culture
Cells were cultured in RPMI media purchased from Cellgro (Manassas, VA)
supplemented with 5% (v/v) FBS. Rapamycin was purchased from LC Laboratory
(Woburn, MA), and metformin, nutlin-3a, nocodazole and paclitaxel were from
Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Glucose was added to glucose-free RPMI to
desired concentrations or mixed in ratios using RPMI with glucose (2 g/L) and
RPMI without glucose. WI-38, WI-38t fibroblasts immortalized by telomerase and
retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) ARPE-19 cells were described previously [81], [59]. MDA-MB-231 was from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Normal Kidney
Epithelial (NKE) cells were provided by Dr. Katerina V. Gurova (RPCI).
Flow cytometry
Cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and stained with 25 μg/ml propidium iodide
(PI), 0.2% Triton X- 100 and 40 μg/ml RNase in PBS. Flow cytometry was
performed using FACScan, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA with 10,000-20,000
events per sample. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed using Modfit LT software
(Verity Software House Inc., Topsham, ME) with histograms of DNA content
profiles on the X-axis and cell numbers on the y-axis.
Mitotic Index
Following flow cytometry, propidium iodine stained nuclei were visualized on
coverslips and mitotic cells were identified by morphological characteristics
allowing G2 phase verses mitotic cells to be distinguished. Cells were
photographed on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (Thornwood, NY).
Cell Counting
Cells were counted on Vicell Series Cell Viability Analyzer (Beckman Coulter,
Inc., Brea, CA) using Trypan Blue exclusion method to provide a proportion of
live and dead cells.
Immunoblot analysis
Immunoblot was performed as described previously [53]. The following antibodies were used: mouse anti-p53 (Ab-6) from
Oncogene, mouse anti-p21 from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA); rabbit anti-actin
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); secondary goat anti-rabbit and goat
antimouse HRP conjugated antibodies were from Chemicon (Billerica, MA) and
Bio-Rad (St. Louis, MO), respectively.
Authors: Pamela J Goodwin; Kathleen I Pritchard; Marguerite Ennis; Mark Clemons; Margaret Graham; I George Fantus Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Surojit Sur; Raymond Pagliarini; Fred Bunz; Carlo Rago; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kei Kawaguchi; Qinghong Han; Shukuan Li; Yuying Tan; Kentaro Igarashi; Tasuku Kiyuna; Kentaro Miyake; Masuyo Miyake; Bartosz Chmielowski; Scott D Nelson; Tara A Russell; Sarah M Dry; Yunfeng Li; Arun S Singh; Mark A Eckardt; Michiaki Unno; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Kei Kawaguchi; Kentaro Igarashi; Takashi Murakami; Tasuku Kiyuna; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Yunfeng Li; Tara A Russell; Arun S Singh; Bartosz Chmielowski; Michiaki Unno; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: William H Chappell; Stephen L Abrams; Richard A Franklin; Michelle M LaHair; Giuseppe Montalto; Melchiorre Cervello; Alberto M Martelli; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Saverio Candido; Massimo Libra; Jerry Polesel; Renato Talamini; Michele Milella; Agostino Tafuri; Linda S Steelman; James A McCubrey Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Kentaro Igarashi; Kei Kawaguchi; Tasuku Kiyuna; Kentaro Miyake; Masuyo Miyake; Shukuan Li; Qinghong Han; Yuying Tan; Ming Zhao; Yunfeng Li; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Arun S Singh; Irmina A Elliott; Tara A Russell; Mark A Eckardt; Norio Yamamoto; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Hiroaki Kimura; Shinji Miwa; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 4.534