INTRODUCTION: The impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Among 253 LDLT patients, RRT was started before (RRT-Pre, n = 9), or after (RRT-Post, n = 27) LDLT. The clinical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The one-yr graft survival rate was 94.1% without RRT, and 63.9% and in those with RRT (p < 0.0001). Among the RRT patients, the RRT-Pre patients exhibited acute liver failure, hepatorenal syndrome and high model for end-stage liver disease score (35 ± 12), whereas the RRT-Post patients had sepsis as a comorbidity. The one-yr graft survival rate was 100.0% in the RRT-Pre patients vs. 51.9% in the RRT-Post patients (p < 0.01). The duration of RRT was significantly shorter in the RRT-Pre patients than that in the RRT-Post patients (5.3 ± 2.1 vs. 17.8 ± 14.1 d, p = 0.02). The mean duration between starting RRT and LDLT was 2.1 ± 0.7 d in the Pre-RRT patients. CONCLUSION: The RRT-Pre patients had excellent outcomes because the severe condition was primarily treated by LDLT after short-term pre-transplant RRT. Post-transplant uncontrollable sepsis was the major cause of graft loss in patients who receive RRT after LDLT.
INTRODUCTION: The impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Among 253 LDLT patients, RRT was started before (RRT-Pre, n = 9), or after (RRT-Post, n = 27) LDLT. The clinical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The one-yr graft survival rate was 94.1% without RRT, and 63.9% and in those with RRT (p < 0.0001). Among the RRT patients, the RRT-Pre patients exhibited acute liver failure, hepatorenal syndrome and high model for end-stage liver disease score (35 ± 12), whereas the RRT-Post patients had sepsis as a comorbidity. The one-yr graft survival rate was 100.0% in the RRT-Pre patients vs. 51.9% in the RRT-Post patients (p < 0.01). The duration of RRT was significantly shorter in the RRT-Pre patients than that in the RRT-Post patients (5.3 ± 2.1 vs. 17.8 ± 14.1 d, p = 0.02). The mean duration between starting RRT and LDLT was 2.1 ± 0.7 d in the Pre-RRT patients. CONCLUSION: The RRT-Pre patients had excellent outcomes because the severe condition was primarily treated by LDLT after short-term pre-transplant RRT. Post-transplant uncontrollable sepsis was the major cause of graft loss in patients who receive RRT after LDLT.
Authors: Therese Bittermann; Peter L Abt; Kim M Olthoff; Navpreet Kaur; Julie K Heimbach; Juliet Emamaullee Journal: Transplantation Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Ha Yeon Kim; Ja Eun Lee; Justin S Ko; Mi Sook Gwak; Suk-Koo Lee; Gaab Soo Kim Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 1.859