Literature DB >> 21447012

Monitoring the bacterial community of maize silage stored in a bunker silo inoculated with Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri.

Y Li1, N Nishino.   

Abstract

AIMS: To monitor variations in the bacterial community and fermentation products of maize silage within and between bunker silos. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Silage samples were collected in 2008 and 2009 from three dairy farms, wherein the farmers arranged for a contractor to produce maize silage using bunker silos. Silage was prepared using a lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculant consisting of Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri. Eight samples were collected from each bunker silo; 4 'outer' and 4 'inner' samples were collected from near the top and the bottom of the silo. The dry matter, lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, 1-propanol and 1,2-propanediol contents differed between bunker silos in both sampling years. Higher acetic acid, 1-propanol and 1,2-propanediol contents were found in the bottom than the top layers in the 2008 samples, and higher lactic acid content was found in the top than the bottom layers in the 2009 samples. The bacterial community varied more between bunker silos than within a bunker silo in the 2008 samples, whereas differences between the top and the bottom layers were seen across bunker silos in the 2009 samples. The inoculated LAB were uniformly distributed, while several nonconventional silage bacteria were also detected. Lactobacillus acetotolerans, Lactobacillus panis and Acetobacter pasteurianus were detected in both years. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was detected in the 2008 samples, and Lactobacillus reuteri, Acinetobacter sp. and Rahnella sp. were detected in the 2009 samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Although differences were seen within and between bunker silos, the bacterial community may indicate a different relationship between bunker silos and sampling locations within a bunker silo from that indicated by the fermentation products. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Analysis of bacterial community can help understand how diverse non-LAB and LAB species are involved in the ensiling process of bunker-made maize silage.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21447012     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05010.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  12 in total

1.  Effect of ensiling duration on the fate of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and their derivatives in maize silage.

Authors:  Tolke Jensen; Marthe De Boevre; Sarah De Saeger; Nils Preußke; Frank D Sönnichsen; Ewald Kramer; Holger Klink; Joseph-Alexander Verreet; Tim Birr
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Effect of microbial and chemical additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of alfalfa silage ensiled at 2 dry matters and subjected to air stress during storage.

Authors:  Yanbing Li; Erica B da Silva; Charles O Novinski; Limin Kung
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Effects of Ensiling Fermentation and Aerobic Deterioration on the Bacterial Community in Italian Ryegrass, Guinea Grass, and Whole-crop Maize Silages Stored at High Moisture Content.

Authors:  Yanbing Li; Naoki Nishino
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Characterization of Feruloyl Esterases Produced by the Four Lactobacillus Species: L. amylovorus, L. acidophilus, L. farciminis and L. fermentum, Isolated from Ensiled Corn Stover.

Authors:  Zhenshang Xu; Huiying He; Susu Zhang; Tingting Guo; Jian Kong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage.

Authors:  Javad Gharechahi; Zohreh Akhavan Kharazian; Sajjad Sarikhan; Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani; Mahnaz Aghdasi; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Seasonal Occurrence and Carbapenem Susceptibility of Bovine Acinetobacter baumannii in Germany.

Authors:  Peter Klotz; Paul G Higgins; Andreas R Schaubmar; Klaus Failing; Ursula Leidner; Harald Seifert; Sandra Scheufen; Torsten Semmler; Christa Ewers
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The Microbiota Dynamics of Alfalfa Silage During Ensiling and After Air Exposure, and the Metabolomics After Air Exposure Are Affected by Lactobacillus casei and Cellulase Addition.

Authors:  Zongfu Hu; Huaxin Niu; Qing Tong; Jie Chang; Jianhua Yu; Shuguo Li; Shi Zhang; Deying Ma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Diversity of bacterial community during ensiling and subsequent exposure to air in whole-plant maize silage.

Authors:  Zongfu Hu; Jie Chang; Jianhua Yu; Shuguo Li; Huaxin Niu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 9.  Trends in designing microbial silage quality by biotechnological methods using lactic acid bacteria inoculants: a minireview.

Authors:  Agata U Fabiszewska; K J Zielińska; B Wróbel
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Co-Occurrence of Regulated and Emerging Mycotoxins in Corn Silage: Relationships with Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Antonio Gallo; Francesca Ghilardelli; Alberto Stanislao Atzori; Severino Zara; Barbara Novak; Johannes Faas; Francesco Fancello
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.