Literature DB >> 21446940

Intraoperative cell salvage in obstetrics: is it a real therapeutic option?

Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno1, Chiara Liumbruno, Daniela Rafanelli.   

Abstract

Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality worldwide. Intraoperative blood salvage is common practice in many surgical specialties but its safety in obstetrics is questioned for concerns on the risks of contamination of recovered blood with amniotic fluid (AF) and of maternal-fetal alloimmunization. However, the role of cell salvage as a blood-saving measure in obstetrics is progressively acquiring relevance thanks to the growing body of evidence regarding its quality and safety coming from over 800 documented procedures and more than 400 patients transfused with saved blood. Although the information about the outcomes of the patients treated and the allogeneic blood saving effect are still limited, modern cell savers remove most particulate contaminants and leukoreduction filtering of salvaged blood (SB) before transfusion adds further safety to this technique. Moreover, AF embolism is no longer regarded as an embolic disease and it is suggested that it is a rare anaphylactoid reaction to the fetal antigen. The contamination of the SB by fetal Rh-mismatched red blood cells (RBCs) can be dealt with using RhIG; ABO incompatibility tends to be a minor problem since ABO antigens are not fully developed at birth. Antibodies can be formed against other fetal RBC antigens, but it should also be noted that the risk of alloimmunization of the mother from allogeneic transfusion is probably even greater. Therefore, intraoperative cell salvage in obstetrics should be considered in patients at high risk for hemorrhage or in cases where allogeneic blood transfusion is difficult or impossible.
© 2011 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21446940     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03116.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

1.  Spanish Consensus Statement on alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion: the 2013 update of the "Seville Document".

Authors:  Santiago R Leal-Noval; Manuel Muñoz; Marisol Asuero; Enric Contreras; José A García-Erce; Juan V Llau; Victoria Moral; José A Páramo; Manuel Quintana
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  The safty profile of blood salvage applied for collected blood with amniotic fluid during cesarean section.

Authors:  Xiaoying Rong; Xiangyang Guo; Hong Zeng; Jun Wang; Mi Li; Yang Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Comparative changes of pre-operative autologous transfusions and peri-operative cell salvage in the United States.

Authors:  Ruchika Goel; Molly R Petersen; Eshan U Patel; Zoe Packman; Evan M Bloch; Eric A Gehrie; Parvez M Lokhandwala; Paul M Ness; Beth Shaz; Louis M Katz; Steven M Frank; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Comparison of cell salvage with one and two suction devices during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Hua Tan; Pei-Xin Luo; Yi-Fang Shen; Chang-Cheng Lyu; Xiao-Wei Qian; Xin-Zhong Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Intraoperative cell salvage for obstetrics: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ye Liu; Xiaoguang Li; Xiangming Che; Guosheng Zhao; Mingjun Xu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.