Literature DB >> 21446054

Pore size regulates cell and tissue interactions with PLGA-CaP scaffolds used for bone engineering.

Luciana Gonçalves Sicchieri1, Grasiele Edilaine Crippa, Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira, Marcio Mateus Beloti, Adalberto Luiz Rosa.   

Abstract

A common subject in bone tissue engineering is the need for porous scaffolds to support cell and tissue interactions aiming at repairing bone tissue. As poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-calcium phosphate (PLGA-CaP) scaffolds can be manufactured with different pore sizes, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pore diameter on osteoblastic cell responses and bone tissue formation. Scaffolds were prepared with 85% porosity, with pore diameters in the ranges 470-590, 590-850 and 850-1200 µm. Rat bone marrow stem cells differentiated into osteoblasts were cultured on the scaffolds for up to 10 days to evaluate cell growth, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the gene expression of the osteoblast markers RUNX2, OSX, COL, MSX2, ALP, OC and BSP by real-time PCR. Scaffolds were implanted in critical size rat calvarial defects for 2, 4, and 8 weeks for histomorphometric analysis. Cell growth and ALP activity were not affected by the pore size; however, there was an increase in the gene expression of osteoblastic markers with the increase in the pore sizes. At 2 weeks all scaffolds displayed a similar amount of bone and blood vessels formation. At 4 and 8 weeks much more bone formation and an increased number of blood vessels were observed in scaffolds with pores of 470-590 µm. These results show that PLGA-CaP is a promising biomaterial for bone engineering. However, ideally, combinations of larger (-1000 µm) and smaller (-500 µm) pores in a single scaffold would optimize cellular and tissue responses during bone healing.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21446054     DOI: 10.1002/term.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  22 in total

Review 1.  Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jeremy M Holzwarth; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Solaiman Tarafder; Vamsi Krishna Balla; Neal M Davies; Amit Bandyopadhyay; Susmita Bose
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Remodeling of tissue-engineered bone structures in vivo.

Authors:  Sandra Hofmann; Monika Hilbe; Robert J Fajardo; Henri Hagenmüller; Katja Nuss; Margarete Arras; Ralph Müller; Brigitte von Rechenberg; David L Kaplan; Hans P Merkle; Lorenz Meinel
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.571

Review 4.  Clinical applications of naturally derived biopolymer-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; Chiara E Ghezzi; Stephanie L McNamara; Lauren D Black; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  * Tissue Engineering Strategies to Improve Osteogenesis in the Juvenile Swine Alveolar Cleft Model.

Authors:  Montserrat Caballero; Donna C Jones; Zhengyuan Shan; Sajjad Soleimani; John A van Aalst
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.056

6.  Materials-Directed Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.

Authors:  J Kent Leach; Jacklyn Whitehead
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-03-14

7.  Effect of Chemistry on Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis Towards Bone Tissue Engineering Using 3D Printed Scaffolds.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Solaiman Tarafder; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Texturized P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane enhances bone neoformation in calvaria defects regardless of the association with photobiomodulation therapy in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Fernanda Cristina Toloi Rufato; Luiz Gustavo de Sousa; Priscilla Hakime Scalize; Rossano Gimenes; Isabela Hallak Regalo; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Fabíola Singaretti de Oliveira; Karina Fittipaldi Bombonato-Prado; Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo; Selma Siéssere
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Derek H Rosenzweig; Eric Carelli; Thomas Steffen; Peter Jarzem; Lisbet Haglund
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Ceramic identity contributes to mechanical properties and osteoblast behavior on macroporous composite scaffolds.

Authors:  Diana G Morales-Hernandez; Damian C Genetos; David M Working; Kaitlin C Murphy; J Kent Leach
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2012-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.