Literature DB >> 21445989

A preliminary study comparing the use of allogenic chondrogenic pre-differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells for the repair of full thickness articular cartilage defects in rabbits.

Havva Dashtdar1, Hussin A Rothan, Terence Tay, Raja Elina Ahmad, Razif Ali, Liang Xin Tay, Pan Pan Chong, Tunku Kamarul.   

Abstract

Chondrogenic differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (CMSCs) have been shown to produce superior chondrogenic expression markers in vitro. However, the use of these cells in vivo has not been fully explored. In this study, in vivo assessment of cartilage repair potential between allogenic-derived chondrogenic pre-differentiated mesenchymal stem cells and undifferentiated MSCs (MSCs) were compared. Bilateral full thickness cartilage defects were created on the medial femoral condyles of 12 rabbits (n = 12). Rabbits were divided into two groups. In one group, the defects in the right knees were repaired using alginate encapsulated MSCs while in the second group, CMSCs were used. The animals were sacrificed and the repaired and control knees were assessed at 3 and 6 months after implantation. Quantitative analysis was performed by measuring the Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)/total protein content. The mean Brittberg score was higher in the transplanted knees as compared to the untreated knee at 6 months (p < 0.05). Quantitative analysis of GAGs was consistent with these results. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated hyaline-like cartilage regeneration in the transplanted sites. Significant differences between the histological scores based on O'Driscoll histological grading were observed between contralateral knees at both 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the Britberg, O'Driscoll scores, and GAGs/total protein content when comparing defect sites treated with MSC and CMSC (p > 0.05). This study demonstrates that the use of either MSC or CMSC produced superior healing when compared to cartilage defects that were untreated. However, both cells produced comparable treatment outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21445989     DOI: 10.1002/jor.21413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  29 in total

1.  Alginate: properties and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Kuen Yong Lee; David J Mooney
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 29.190

2.  Cartilage repair techniques in the knee: stem cell therapies.

Authors:  Shinichi Yoshiya; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Toward improved clinical relevance of cartilage insult models in the rabbit knee: surgical access to the habitual weight-bearing region.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; Joseph A Buckwalter; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

4.  The role of environmental factors in regulating the development of cartilaginous grafts engineered using osteoarthritic human infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Yurong Liu; Conor T Buckley; Richard Downey; Kevin J Mulhall; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Next Generation Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC)-Based Cartilage Repair Using Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineered Constructs Generated with Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Kazunori Shimomura; Wataru Ando; Yu Moriguchi; Norihiko Sugita; Yukihiko Yasui; Kota Koizumi; Hiromichi Fujie; David A Hart; Hideki Yoshikawa; Norimasa Nakamura
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  * CRISPR-Based Epigenome Editing of Cytokine Receptors for the Promotion of Cell Survival and Tissue Deposition in Inflammatory Environments.

Authors:  Niloofar Farhang; Jonathan M Brunger; Joshua D Stover; Pratiksha I Thakore; Brandon Lawrence; Farshid Guilak; Charles A Gersbach; Lori A Setton; Robby D Bowles
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Optimal Seeding Densities for In Vitro Chondrogenesis of Two- and Three-Dimensional-Isolated and -Expanded Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Stem Cells Within a Porous Collagen Scaffold.

Authors:  Troy D Bornes; Nadr M Jomha; Aillette Mulet-Sierra; Adetola B Adesida
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.056

8.  Osteochondral defect repair using bilayered hydrogels encapsulating both chondrogenically and osteogenically pre-differentiated mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit model.

Authors:  J Lam; S Lu; E J Lee; J E Trachtenberg; V V Meretoja; R L Dahlin; J J J P van den Beucken; Y Tabata; M E Wong; J A Jansen; A G Mikos; F K Kasper
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  PVA-chitosan composite hydrogel versus alginate beads as a potential mesenchymal stem cell carrier for the treatment of focal cartilage defects.

Authors:  Havva Dashtdar; Malliga Raman Murali; Azlina Amir Abbas; Abdulrazzaq Mahmod Suhaeb; Lakshmi Selvaratnam; Liang Xin Tay; Tunku Kamarul
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  [Cell-based therapy options for osteochondral defects. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells compared to autologous chondrocytes].

Authors:  S Grässel; S Anders
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.