Literature DB >> 21445050

Demonstrating the uses of the novel gravitational force spectrometer to stretch and measure fibrous proteins.

James W Dunn1, Douglas D Root.   

Abstract

The study of macromolecular structure has become critical to the elucidation of molecular mechanisms and function. There are several limited, but important bioinstruments capable of testing the force dependence of structural features in proteins. Scale has been a limiting parameter on how accurately researchers can peer into the nanomechanical world of molecules, such as nucleic acids, enzymes, and motor proteins that perform life-sustaining work. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is well tuned to determine native structures of fibrous proteins with a distance resolution on par with electron microscopy. However, in AFM force studies, the forces are typically much higher than a single molecule might experience. Optical traps (OT) are very good at determining the relative distance between the trapped beads and they can impart very small forces. However, they do not yield accurate absolute lengths of the molecules under study. Molecular simulations provide supportive information to such experiments, but are limited in the ability to handle the same large molecular sizes, long time frames, and convince some researchers in the absence of other supporting evidence. The gravitational force spectrometer (GFS) fills a critical niche in the arsenal of an investigator by providing a unique combination of abilities. This instrument is capable of generating forces typically with 98% or better accuracy from the femtonewton range to the nanonewton range. The distance measurements currently are capable of resolving the absolute molecular length down to five nanometers, and relative bead pair separation distances with a precision similar to an optical trap. Also, the GFS can determine stretching or uncoiling where the force is near equilibrium, or provide a graded force to juxtapose against any measured structural changes. It is even possible to determine how many amino acid residues are involved in uncoiling events under physiological force loads. Unlike in other methods where there is extensive force calibration that must precede any assay, the GFS requires no such force calibration. By complementing the strengths of other methods, the GFS will bridge gaps in understanding the nanomechanics of vital proteins and other macromolecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21445050      PMCID: PMC3197318          DOI: 10.3791/2624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  Dynamic docking of myosin and actin observed with resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Douglas D Root; Shaun Stewart; Jin Xu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  The myosin coiled-coil is a truly elastic protein structure.

Authors:  Ingo Schwaiger; Clara Sattler; Daniel R Hostetter; Matthias Rief
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Fluorescence labeling and computational analysis of the strut of myosin's 50kDa cleft.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Gawalapu; Douglas D Root
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 4.  Visualizing and manipulating individual protein molecules.

Authors:  Miklós S Z Kellermayer
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Coiled-coil nanomechanics and uncoiling and unfolding of the superhelix and alpha-helices of myosin.

Authors:  Douglas D Root; Vamsi K Yadavalli; Jeffrey G Forbes; Kuan Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Unbinding force of a single motor molecule of muscle measured using optical tweezers.

Authors:  T Nishizaka; H Miyata; H Yoshikawa; S Ishiwata; K Kinosita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Self-association in the myosin system at high ionic strength. I. Sensitivity of the interaction to pH and ionic environment.

Authors:  J E Godfrey; W F Harrington
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1970-02-17       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Conformational selection during weak binding at the actin and myosin interface.

Authors:  J Xu; D D Root
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  DNA base pair resolution by single molecule force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bernie D Sattin; Andrew E Pelling; M Cynthia Goh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Axial arrangement of the myosin rod in vertebrate thick filaments: immunoelectron microscopy with a monoclonal antibody to light meromyosin.

Authors:  T Shimizu; J E Dennis; T Masaki; D A Fischman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 10.539

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.