Literature DB >> 21444932

Ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to LiCl- and amphetamine-induced taste avoidance in preweanling rats.

Damián Alejandro Revillo1, Norman E Spear, Carlos Arias.   

Abstract

When amphetamine is associated with a tastant conditioned stimulus, rats learn to avoid the taste even when employing doses that promote conditioned place preference. One hypothesis raised to account for this effect proposes that taste avoidance induced by amphetamine may be motivated by fear. A sensitive period has been identified in the rat (until postnatal day 10) in which infants learn conditioned appetitive effects to stimuli to which aversions are conditioned after this period. Exogenous administration of corticosterone within this period reverses this effect, generating aversive conditioning. In the present study, we tested conditioning of aversions to amphetamine or LiCl, within and after the sensitive period (Experiments 1 and 2). A third experiment evaluated unconditioned rejection of an aversive quinine solution within the sensitive period. Finally, we tested whether corticosterone administration before conditioning modulates amphetamine-induced taste avoidance. After the sensitive period, infant rats rejected the solution paired with amphetamine or LiCl after 2 conditioning trials, but within the sensitive period, aversions were conditioned only by LiCl and after 4 conditioning trials. Amphetamine-induced taste avoidance was not observed even when corticosterone was administered before conditioning. Additionally, during the sensitive period, a low LiCl dose promoted conditioned taste preference. According to Experiment 3, parameters employed in this study were suitable to yield rejection of aversive solutions within the sensitive period. These results suggest that during the sensitive period, there is a notable resistance to the acquisition of taste avoidance induced by amphetamine. The present experimental framework may represent a useful tool for studying mechanisms underlying taste avoidance and aversion effects.
© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444932      PMCID: PMC3110873          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  55 in total

1.  Ontogeny of dopamine agonist-induced sensitization: role of NMDA receptors.

Authors:  M A Duke; J O'Neal; S A McDougall
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Conditioned reflex responses of the sympathetico-adrenal system to an aversive taste stimulus.

Authors:  V G Kassil'; V A Mikhailenko
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

3.  EEG arousal, sympathetic activity, and brown adipose tissue thermogenesis after conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  S Amaro; M Monda; B De Luca
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1996-07

Review 4.  Glucocorticoids and the hippocampus. Developmental interactions facilitating the expression of behavioral inhibition.

Authors:  L K Takahashi
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Conditioned taste aversions and drugs of abuse: a reinterpretation.

Authors:  P S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  c-Fos induction in rat brainstem in response to ethanol- and lithium chloride-induced conditioned taste aversions.

Authors:  T E Thiele; M F Roitman; I L Bernstein
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Rewarding drugs produce taste avoidance, but not taste aversion.

Authors:  L A Parker
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species.

Authors:  R R Holson; B Pearce
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

9.  Ontogenetic differences in the association of gustatory and tactile cues with lithium chloride and footshock.

Authors:  H Hoffmann; P Hunt; N E Spear
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1990-05

10.  Anterior and posterior, but not cheek, intraoral cannulation procedures elevate serum corticosterone levels in neonatal rat pups.

Authors:  L P Spear; S M Specht; C L Kirstein; C M Kuhn
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.