BACKGROUND: Extramedullary cortical button-based fixation for distal biceps tendon ruptures exhibits maximum load to failure in vitro but cannot restore the anatomic footprint and has the potential risk for injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. HYPOTHESIS: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation repair provides superior fixation strength to the bone when compared with single extramedullary cortical button-based repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: The technique of intramedullary cortical button fixation with 1 or 2 buttons was compared with single extramedullary cortical button-based repair using 12 paired human cadaveric elbows. All specimens underwent computed tomography analysis to determine intramedullary dimensions of the radial tuberosity as well as the thickness of the anterior and posterior cortices before biomechanical testing. Maximum load to failure and failure modes were recorded. For baseline measurements, the native tendon was tested for maximum load to failure. RESULTS: The intramedullary area of the radial tuberosity provides sufficient space for single or double intramedullary cortical button implantation. The mean thickness of the anterior cortex was 1.13 ± 0.15 mm, and for the posterior cortex it was 1.97 ± 0.48 mm (P < .001). We found the highest loads to failure for double intramedullary cortical button fixation with a mean load to failure of 455 ± 103 N, versus 275 ± 44 N for single intramedullary cortical button fixation (P < .001) and 305 ± 27 N for single extramedullary cortical button-based technique (P = .003). There were no statistically significant differences between single intramedullary and single extramedullary button fixation repair (P = .081). The mean load to failure for the native tendon was 379 ± 87 N. CONCLUSION: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation provides the highest load to failure in the specimens tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation provides reliable fixation strength to the bone for distal biceps tendon repair and potentially minimizes the risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury. Further, based on a 2-point-fixation, this method may offer a wider, more anatomic restoration of the distal biceps tendon to its anatomic footprint.
BACKGROUND: Extramedullary cortical button-based fixation for distal biceps tendon ruptures exhibits maximum load to failure in vitro but cannot restore the anatomic footprint and has the potential risk for injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. HYPOTHESIS: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation repair provides superior fixation strength to the bone when compared with single extramedullary cortical button-based repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: The technique of intramedullary cortical button fixation with 1 or 2 buttons was compared with single extramedullary cortical button-based repair using 12 paired human cadaveric elbows. All specimens underwent computed tomography analysis to determine intramedullary dimensions of the radial tuberosity as well as the thickness of the anterior and posterior cortices before biomechanical testing. Maximum load to failure and failure modes were recorded. For baseline measurements, the native tendon was tested for maximum load to failure. RESULTS: The intramedullary area of the radial tuberosity provides sufficient space for single or double intramedullary cortical button implantation. The mean thickness of the anterior cortex was 1.13 ± 0.15 mm, and for the posterior cortex it was 1.97 ± 0.48 mm (P < .001). We found the highest loads to failure for double intramedullary cortical button fixation with a mean load to failure of 455 ± 103 N, versus 275 ± 44 N for single intramedullary cortical button fixation (P < .001) and 305 ± 27 N for single extramedullary cortical button-based technique (P = .003). There were no statistically significant differences between single intramedullary and single extramedullary button fixation repair (P = .081). The mean load to failure for the native tendon was 379 ± 87 N. CONCLUSION: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation provides the highest load to failure in the specimens tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation provides reliable fixation strength to the bone for distal biceps tendon repair and potentially minimizes the risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury. Further, based on a 2-point-fixation, this method may offer a wider, more anatomic restoration of the distal biceps tendon to its anatomic footprint.
Authors: Sebastian Siebenlist; Arne Buchholz; Julian Zapf; Gunther H Sandmann; Karl F Braun; Frank Martetschläger; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Tobias M Kraus; Andreas Lenich; Peter Biberthaler; Florian Elser Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: David D Savin; Hristo Piponov; Jonathan N Watson; Ari R Youderian; Farid Amirouche; Giovanni F Solitro; Mark R Hutchinson; Benjamin A Goldberg Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Lucca Lacheta; Marilee P Horan; Philip C Nolte; Brandon T Goldenberg; Travis J Dekker; Peter J Millett Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-06-21
Authors: Aditi Majumdar; Christina Salas; William Chavez; Christopher Bankhead; Tony J Sapradit; Deana Mercer; Daniel C Wascher; Dustin L Richter Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-04-16
Authors: José Carlos Garcia Júnior; Carlos Daniel Candido de Castro Filho; Tadeu Fujita de Castro Mello; Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos; José Luís Amim Zabeu; Jesely Pereira Myrrha Garcia Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2015-11-04