Literature DB >> 21444317

Insect-resistant biotech crops and their impacts on beneficial arthropods.

A M R Gatehouse1, N Ferry, M G Edwards, H A Bell.   

Abstract

With a projected population of 10 billion by 2050, an immediate priority for agriculture is to achieve increased crop yields in a sustainable and cost-effective way. The concept of using a transgenic approach was realized in the mid-1990s with the commercial introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops. By 2010, the global value of the seed alone was US $11.2 billion, with commercial biotech maize, soya bean grain and cotton valued at approximately US $150 billion. In recent years, it has become evident that insect-resistant crops expressing δ-endotoxin genes from Bacillus thuringiensis have made a significant beneficial impact on global agriculture, not least in terms of pest reduction and improved quality. However, because of the potential for pest populations to evolve resistance, and owing to lack of effective control of homopteran pests, alternative strategies are being developed. Some of these are based on Bacillus spp. or other insect pathogens, while others are based on the use of plant- and animal-derived genes. However, if such approaches are to play a useful role in crop protection, it is desirable that they do not have a negative impact on beneficial organisms at higher trophic levels thus affecting the functioning of the agro-ecosystem. This widely held concern over the ecological impacts of GM crops has led to the extensive examination of the potential effects of a range of transgene proteins on non-target and beneficial insects. The findings to date with respect to both commercial and experimental GM crops expressing anti-insect genes are discussed here, with particular emphasis on insect predators and parasitoids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444317      PMCID: PMC3081576          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  48 in total

Review 1.  How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world.

Authors:  R A de Maagd; A Bravo; N Crickmore
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Effects of a mustard trypsin inhibitor expressed in different plants on three lepidopteran pests.

Authors:  F De Leo; M Bonadé-Bottino; L R Ceci; R Gallerani; L Jouanin
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 4.714

3.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.

Authors:  J E Losey; L S Rayor; M E Carter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Direct and indirect sublethal effects of Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA) on the development of a potato-aphid parasitoid, Aphelinus abdominalis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae).

Authors:  A Couty; G de la Viña; S J. Clark; L Kaiser; M -H. Pham-Delègue; G M. Poppy
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Population-scale laboratory studies of the effect of transgenic plants on nontarget insects.

Authors:  T H Schuler; I Denholm; L Jouanin; S J Clark; A J Clark; G M Poppy
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions.

Authors:  A R Zangerl; D McKenna; C L Wraight; M Carroll; P Ficarello; R Warner; M R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen.

Authors:  K S Oberhauser; M D Prysby; H R Mattila; D E Stanley-Horn; M K Sears; G Dively; E Olson; J M Pleasants; W K Lam; R L Hellmich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Transgenic GNA expressing potato plants augment the beneficial biocontrol of Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) by the parasitoid Eulophus pennicornis (Hymenoptera; Eulophidae).

Authors:  H A Bell; E C Fitches; G C Marris; J Bell; J P Edwards; J A Gatehouse; A M Gatehouse
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Effect of dietary cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI) on the growth and development of the tomato moth Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and on the success of the gregarious ectoparasitoid Eulophus pennicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae).

Authors:  H A Bell; E C Fitches; R E Down; L Ford; G C Marris; J P Edwards; J A Gatehouse; A M Gatehouse
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 10.  Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests.

Authors:  F S Betz; B G Hammond; R L Fuchs
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  19 in total

1.  Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services.

Authors:  Yanhui Lu; Kongming Wu; Yuying Jiang; Yuyuan Guo; Nicolas Desneux
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Multilocus sequence typing for phylogenetic view and vip gene diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains of the Assam soil of North East India.

Authors:  Mihir Rabha; Sumita Acharjee; Bidyut Kumar Sarmah
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Forward from the crossroads of ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jennifer K Rowntree; David M Shuker; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Food safety knowledge on the Bt mutant protein Cry8Ka5 employed in the development of coleopteran-resistant transgenic cotton plants.

Authors:  Davi F Farias; Ad A C M Peijnenburg; Maria F Grossi-de-Sá; Ana F U Carvalho
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 5.  Engineering plants for aphid resistance: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Xiudao Yu; Genping Wang; Siliang Huang; Youzhi Ma; Lanqin Xia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Regional pest suppression associated with widespread Bt maize adoption benefits vegetable growers.

Authors:  Galen P Dively; P Dilip Venugopal; Dick Bean; Joanne Whalen; Kristian Holmstrom; Thomas P Kuhar; Hélène B Doughty; Terry Patton; William Cissel; William D Hutchison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Parallel evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin resistance in lepidoptera.

Authors:  Simon W Baxter; Francisco R Badenes-Pérez; Anna Morrison; Heiko Vogel; Neil Crickmore; Wendy Kain; Ping Wang; David G Heckel; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  The insecticidal potential of venom peptides.

Authors:  Jennifer J Smith; Volker Herzig; Glenn F King; Paul F Alewood
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  The insecticidal neurotoxin Aps III is an atypical knottin peptide that potently blocks insect voltage-gated sodium channels.

Authors:  Niraj S Bende; Eunji Kang; Volker Herzig; Frank Bosmans; Graham M Nicholson; Mehdi Mobli; Glenn F King
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 10.  Influences of Plant Traits on Immune Responses of Specialist and Generalist Herbivores.

Authors:  Evan Lampert
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.