Literature DB >> 21443957

A phylogenetic analysis of the boreal lichen Mycoblastus sanguinarius (Mycoblastaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) reveals cryptic clades correlated with fatty acid profiles.

Toby Spribille1, Barbara Klug, Helmut Mayrhofer.   

Abstract

Lichens are a prominent feature of northern conifer forests and a large number of species are thought to be circumboreal. Whether or not circumboreal lichen species really constitute monophyletic groups has seldom been tested. We investigated molecular phylogenetic patterns in the mycobiont of Mycoblastus sanguinarius, a well known epiphytic lichen species of the boreal forest, based on material collected from across the high latitude northern hemisphere. A three-locus dataset of internal transcribed spacer rDNA, translation elongation factor 1-α and replication licensing factor Mcm7 DNA sequences revealed that material treated until now as belonging to M. sanguinarius does indeed form a monophyletic group within the genus and is distinct from a strongly supported Mycoblastus affinis. The M. sanguinarius complex appears closely related to the rare Mycoblastus glabrescens, which is currently known only from the Pacific Northwest and was rediscovered during the present study. However, within M. sanguinarius s.lat. in the northern hemisphere, two deeply divergent and morphologically coherent species can be recovered, one of which matches the southern hemisphere species Mycoblastus sanguinarioides and turns out to be widespread in North America and Asia, and one of which corresponds to M. sanguinarius s.str. Both M. sanguinarius and M. sanguinarioides exhibit additional low-level genetic differentiation into geographically structured clades, the most prominent of which are distributed in East Asia/eastern North America and western North America/Europe, respectively. Individuals from these lowest-level clades are morphologically indistinguishable but chemical analyses by thin layer chromatography revealed that each clade possesses its own fatty acid profile, suggesting that chemical differentiation precedes morphological differentiation and may be a precursor to speciation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21443957      PMCID: PMC3093615          DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


Introduction

Many lichen species occurring at high latitudes have a circumboreal distribution, i.e., they occur around the northern hemisphere in the zone of boreal coniferous forests. There is no single worldwide survey of precisely how many species share this distribution, but rough estimates suggest that it may be as much as 60–70% of the macrolichen floras in regions such as northern Europe or eastern North America, and over 1000 species in total (Ahti, 1977; Printzen, 2008). Much of what we assume today about species having circumboreal distributions dates from an era when European-based taxonomic concepts were still applied through keys to two of the world’s most biodiverse high latitude regions, northwest North America and the Russian Far East. It is thus an open question how many circumboreal species, upon detailed phylogenetic study, will actually be found to be monophyletic. Results of the few phylogenetic studies in widespread lichen species up to now have been mixed when it comes to reporting hidden taxa. Molecular phylogenetic studies at lower, temperate latitudes have revealed extensive cryptic speciation or clade differentiation in lichenized fungi (Kroken and Taylor, 2001; Crespo et al., 2002; Buschbom and Mueller, 2006; Argüello et al., 2007; Divakar et al., 2010). Such ‘cryptic species’ are in some cases confirmation of subtle morphological patterns already detected and named by taxonomists and in other cases they are lineages that have genuinely been missed in all taxonomic studies (Crespo and Pérez-Ortega, 2009). At the same time, Geml et al. (2010) have shown that in at least two widespread arctic–alpine lichen fungi (Flavocetraria cucullata and Flavocetraria nivalis) molecular phylogenies support current morphology-based species delimitations, suggesting not all currently accepted species are necessarily repositories of hidden diversity. No circumboreal lichen species has yet been studied using a molecular phylogenetic approach across its entire range, but doing so may provide insights into the phylogenetic diversity potentially concealed within such species. After screening numerous taxa with this distribution for their suitability for such a study, we chose Mycoblastus sanguinarius (L.) Norman, a common and easily recognized member of the circumboreal element reported from across the northern hemisphere. M. sanguinarius is one of the original 80 lichen taxa recognized by Linnaeus (1753) in the first edition of his Species Plantarum (as Lichen sanguinarius), and is a well-known lichen species of the boreal forest, where it typically grows on conifer bark and wood. It is easily recognized on account of a deep red pigment (mysaquinone, also known as rhodocladonic acid) in the tissue below the apothecium, often visible even in the field after being exposed by snail grazing, giving rise to the common name ‘bloody heart lichen’. In addition to Scandinavia, it is also known from Greenland, Scotland, the central European mountain ranges, across Russia to the Sea of Okhotsk and Japan, and across the northern half of North America (Brodo et al., 2001; Andreev et al., 2008). Scattered disjunct occurrences are known from high mountains at lower latitudes. Reports of the species from the southern hemisphere have in part been revised to belong to another putatively closely related species, Mycoblastus sanguinarioides (Kantvilas, 2009). Interest in the variation within M. sanguinarius began in the mid-19th century, and much of it revolved around forms that lacked the red pigment below the apothecia. An arctic–alpine form on moss was recognized already in 1831 as var. alpinus, and was later raised to species rank (Mycoblastus alpinus [Fr.] Hellb.). In 1850, the Swiss botanist Schaerer was the first to recognize the unpigmented form as a separate species that later came to be called Mycoblastus affinis (Schaer.) T. Schauer (Schauer, 1964; syn. Mycoblastus melinus [Kremp.] Hellb.). However, in the absence of chemical and molecular insights, speculation continued that M. affinis and even M. alpinus were merely forms of M. sanguinarius (Anders, 1928). Some Fennoscandian lichenologists took a more splitting view and not only recognized M. affinis and M. alpinus, but also began parsing M. sanguinarius into several infraspecific varieties and forms based on degree of pigmentation, size of apothecia, and presence or absence of a thalline tissue rim around the apothecia (Nylander, 1890; Wainio, 1909). One other species with red pigment below the apothecia, Mycoblastus japonicus Müll.Arg., was described from Japan and continues to be known only from eastern Asia. Another widespread northern hemisphere taxon, Mycoblastus fucatus (Stirt.) Zahlbr., differs from other species of Mycoblastus in its anomalous ascocarp characters and its assignment to Mycoblastus is uncertain. The introduction of microchemical and chromatographic methods in the 20th century revolutionized lichen taxonomy and also came to bear on Mycoblastus. Tønsberg (1992) and Huneck and Schmidt (1995) were the first to discover the chemical distinctness of M. affinis and M. japonicus, respectively, from M. sanguinarius in their secondary compounds. Tønsberg was also the first to investigate fatty acids in Mycoblastus, followed later by Kantvilas (2009), although in both cases a relatively small number of samples were investigated. Kantvilas (2009) also resurrected an obscure Pacific Northwest taxon, Mycoblastus glabrescens (Nyl.) Zahlbr., known only from a single specimen and likewise distinguished by a fatty acid. Otherwise no comprehensive survey has been undertaken of Mycoblastus chemistry to date. Notwithstanding the untested nature of the species delimitations of M. sanguinarius relative to M. affinis and M. japonicus, it appears relatively few taxa are involved compared to many other boreal species complexes. Even so, we were well aware that morphological coherence in a taxon such as M. sanguinarius does not necessarily predict monophyly. We were prepared to face one of three scenarios: (1) M. sanguinarius could indeed include unpigmented forms and chemical variability and should be broadly defined; (2) M. sanguinarius as currently defined is supported by molecular evidence; or (3) M. sanguinarius as currently defined is too broad and supports possibly overlooked but genetically well marked cryptic taxa. We accordingly cast a broad net during field sampling and collected numerous individual thalli regardless of whether apothecia had red pigment and to which taxon they ostensibly belonged. Our overarching aim is to identify a widespread monophyletic group to serve as model species for more detailed studies into circumboreal diversification and gene flow. To this end, the objectives of the present study are threefold: (1) we will provide a phylogenetic framework for the relationship of M. sanguinarius to other taxa (M. affinis, M. alpinus, M. fucatus, M. glabrescens, M. japonicus and M. sanguinarioides) for which various degrees of relatedness have been proposed; (2) we will identify phylogenetic signal within M. sanguinarius s.str. using samples from across its range without any a priori hypotheses about the significance of morphological characters, with the aim of identifying recognizable, operational taxonomic units for future population genetic analysis; and (3) we will examine the resulting clades for patterns that correlate to morphology and secondary chemistry.

Materials and methods

DNA extraction and sequencing

Specimens of M. sanguinarius s.lat. and related taxa were collected throughout the high latitude northern hemisphere during 2008–2009 (Table 1). Specimens were air dried and stored at room temperature until preparation; all vouchers are retained in the herbarium GZU unless otherwise noted and are annotated with the isolate numbers used in Table 1. Material for DNA extraction was taken from apothecia if present, otherwise from parasite-free thallus fragments inspected in water droplets on a microscope slide under 20× magnification. Prepared material was transferred into reaction tubes, dried and pulverized using a TissueLyserII (Retsch). DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) extraction kit using the manufacturer’s instructions.
Table 1

DNA sequence vouchers used in this study and their GenBank accession numbers. All specimens are deposited in GZU unless otherwise indicated.

Isolate CodeLocalityCollector and numberLatitudeLongitudeGenBank Accession Number
EF1-αITSMCM7
Mycoblastus affinis s.lat. (including M. alpinus)
AFF90Philip Lake, Wells Gray Prov. Park, British Columbia, CanadaGoward & Wright s.n.51°52′15.13”N119°55′52.48”WJF744895JF744969JF744809
AFF121Russian River, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 2737160°28.970′N149°56.631′WJF744896JF744812
AFF379Laughing Water Creek, Lincoln Co., Montana, U.S.A.Spribille 3012648°44.711′N114°51.140′WJF744898JF744980JF744795
AFF420Steinerkogel, near Oberzeiring, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 3022047°16.245′N014°25.243′EJF744899JF744978JF744797
AFF464Dreisesselberg, Bavaria, GermanySpribille 3211548°47′27.82“N13°47′29.58“EJF744900JF744979JF744800
AFF465Hörsterkogel, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 3210247°35′24.70“N15°19′37.76“EJF744902JF744977JF744801
AFF466LaBiche River, Yukon Territory, CanadaSpribille 2854160°09.037′N124°05.385′WJF744903JF744802
AFF766Cape Breton Highlands, Nova Scotia, CanadaSpribille & Wagner, 05.10.09, s.n.46°49.389′N60°39.680′WJF744897JF744813
ALP468White Pass, Skagway Borough, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 26781 (KLGO)59°37.033′N135°09.800′WJF744904JF744803
ALP537Lac à Jack, Réserve Faunique des Laurentides, Québec, CanadaSpribille & Wagner, 28.09.09, s.n.47°36.302′N70°59.307′WJF744901JF744976JF744805



Mycoblastus fucatus
FUC600Mt Greylock, Berkshire Co., Massachusetts, U.S.A.Spribille 3216142°38.231′N73°10.208′WJF744968JF744818



Mycoblastus glabrescens
GLA92Elk Pass, Skamania Co., Washington, U.S.A.Spribille 2984846°17.250′N121°58.469′WJF744894JF744967JF744810
GLA352Hobo Cedar Grove Botanical Area, Shoshone Co., Idaho, U.S.A.Spribille 3002447°05.167′N116°06.793′WJF744893JF744985JF744816
GLA367Tombstone Pass, Linn Co., Oregon, U.S.A.Spribille 2989944°23.706′N122°08.493′WJF744892JF744984JF744815



Mycoblastus japonicus
JAP802Sorak-san National Park, Gangwon Province, South KoreaThor 20551 (UPS)38˚06.45-28′N128˚26.00-25.10′EJF744983



Mycoblastus sanguinarioides
SAID85Skeena River area, near Kispiox, British Columbia, CanadaSpribille 29811-B55°32.933′N127°43.625′WJF744883JF744965JF744807
SAID86Bijoux Falls, British Columbia, CanadaSpribille 2615955°18.499′N122°40.277′WJF744881JF744808
SAID117Russian River, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 2736760°28.970′N149°56.631′WJF744890JF744970JF744811
SAID250Chilkoot Trail, Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 27038-A59°34.652′N135°19.766′WJF744884JF744971JF744794
SAID389Divide between Chistiy and Khanda River watersheds, W of De Kastri, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3111151°23.260′N140°21.758′EJF744885JF744975JF744796
SAID422Pravaya Bureya River, Bureinskiy Zapovednik, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3186652°09.604′N134°19.697′EJF744798
SAID46010 km W of DeKastri, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3065551°26.743′N140°38.357′EJF744886JF744974JF744799
SAID525Khomi Mountains, just S of mountain ‘Shaman’, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3061451°24.172′N139°59.485′EJF744964JF744804
SAID539Hwy 7 SW of Sherbrooke, Nova Scotia, CanadaSpribille & Wagner, 06.10.09, s.n.45°06.499′N62°00.453′WJF744887JF744982
SAID542Advocate Harbour, Nova Scotia, CanadaSpribille & Wagner, 08.10.09, s.n.45°20.248′N64°44.550′WJF744888JF744981JF744806
SAID581Track to Lake Nicholls, Tasmania, AustraliaKantvilas 348/0842°40′S146°39′EJF744973JF744820
SAID582Foot of Adams Peak, Tasmania, AustraliaKantvilas 1/0941°44′S146°41′EJF744889JF744972JF744819
SAID633St. Croix River, Charlotte Co., New Brunswick, CanadaClayden 16162 (NBM)45.32°N67.43′WJF744882JF744966JF744817
SAID760Jefferson Notch, Coos Co., New Hampshire, U.S.A.Spribille & Wagner, 23.09.09, s.n.44°17.793′N71°21.284′WJF744891JF744963JF744814



Mycoblastus sanguinarius
SANG73Hobo Cedar Grove Botanical Area, Shoshone Co., Idaho, U.S.A.Spribille 30026-A47°05.167′N116°06.793′WJF744822JF744909JF744741
SANG77Laughing Water Creek, Lincoln Co., Montana, U.S.A.Spribille 30127-A48°44.711′N114°51.140′WJF744823JF744910JF744742
SANG79Dawson Falls, Wells Gray Prov. Park, British Columbia, CanadaSpribille 2615251°57.824′N120°07.695′WJF744824JF744911JF744743
SANG81Cowlitz River, Skamania Co., Washington, U.S.A.Spribille 29839-A46°39.507′N121°36.131′WJF744825JF744912JF744744
SANG94Chena River, E of Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 2761464°53.665′N146°41.428′WJF744826JF744745
SANG100Retallack, British Columbia, CanadaSpribille 30134-A50°02.527′N117°09.027′WJF744879JF744913JF744746
SANG120Russian River, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 2737060°28.970′N149°56.631′WJF744827JF744914JF744747
SANG123Russian River, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 2737360°28.970′N149°56.631′WJF744828JF744915JF744748
SANG124Hartelsgraben, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 30207-A47°35.138′N014°42.341′EJF744872JF744749
SANG128Hartelsgraben, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 30201-C47°35.138′N014°42.341′EJF744829JF744916JF744750
SANG129Hartelsgraben, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 30201-D47°35.138′N014°42.341′EJF744830JF744917JF744751
SANG130Hartelsgraben, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 30207-B47°35.138′N014°42.341′EJF744831JF744918JF744752
SANG131Hartelsgraben, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Steiermark, AustriaSpribille 30201-E47°35.138′N014°42.341′EJF744832JF744919JF744753
SANG135Mt. Blaxas, Forsa Parish, Hälsingland, SwedenWedin 829561°38′29.6“N16°46′40.8“EJF744833JF744920JF744754
SANG136Mt. Blaxas, Forsa Parish, Hälsingland, SwedenWedin 829761°38′29.6“N16°46′40.8“EJF744834JF744921JF744755
SANG138Mt. Blaxas, Forsa Parish, Hälsingland, SwedenWedin 829061°38′29.6“N16°46′40.8“EJF744922JF744756
SANG141Mt. Blaxas, Forsa Parish, Hälsingland, SwedenWedin 828861°38′29.6“N16°46′40.8“EJF744835JF744923JF744757
SANG142Mt. Blaxas, Forsa Parish, Hälsingland, SwedenWedin 829961°38′29.6“N16°46′40.8“EJF744836JF744924JF744758
SANG152Reserva Integral de Muniellos, Asturias, SpainSpribille 30264-D43°01.922′N6°41.654′WJF744837JF744925
SANG156Reserva Integral de Muniellos, Asturias, SpainSpribille 30264-F43°01.922′N6°41.654′WJF744838JF744926JF744759
SANG159Reserva Integral de Muniellos, Asturias, SpainSpribille 30264-I43°01.922′N6°41.654′WJF744839JF744927JF744760
SANG161Reserva Integral de Muniellos, Asturias, SpainSpribille 30264-K43°01.922′N6°41.654′WJF744840JF744928JF744761
SANG165Åsane, Hordaland, NorwaySpribille 30237-E60°27.373′N005°18.328′EJF744844JF744929
SANG166Åsane, Hordaland, NorwaySpribille 30237-F60°27.373′N005°18.328′EJF744841JF744930JF744762
SANG167Åsane, Hordaland, NorwaySpribille 30237-K60°27.373′N005°18.328′EJF744842JF744931JF744763
SANG169Åsane, Hordaland, NorwaySpribille 30237-H60°27.373′N005°18.328′EJF744880JF744932JF744764
SANG170Åsane, Hordaland, NorwaySpribille 30237-I60°27.373′N005°18.328′EJF744843JF744905JF744765
SANG175Tavelsjö Parish, Västerbotten, SwedenWedin 833664°02′36.4′N20°18′07.8“EJF744845JF744933
SANG177Tavelsjö Parish, Västerbotten, SwedenWedin 833864°02′36.4′N20°18′07.8“EJF744846JF744934JF744766
SANG180Tavelsjö Parish, Västerbotten, SwedenWedin 834264°02′36.4′N20°18′07.8“EJF744847JF744935JF744767
SANG181Tavelsjö Parish, Västerbotten, SwedenWedin 834364°02′36.4′N20°18′07.8“EJF744848JF744936JF744768
SANG185Western Beskidy Mtns., Gorce Mtns., PolandCzarnota 121008/849°33.150′N20°07.183′EJF744849JF744937JF744769
SANG188Western Beskidy Mtns., Gorce Mtns., PolandCzarnota 121008/449°33.150′N20°07.183′EJF744850JF744938JF744770
SANG189Western Beskidy Mtns., Gorce Mtns., PolandCzarnota 121008/949°33.150′N20°07.183′EJF744851JF744939JF744771
SANG190Western Beskidy Mtns., Gorce Mtns., PolandCzarnota 121008/1049°33.150′N20°07.183′EJF744852JF744940JF744772
SANG192Western Beskidy Mtns., Gorce Mtns., PolandCzarnota 121008/249°33.150′N20°07.183′EJF744853JF744941JF744773
SANG194Steinkjer, W of Lauvåsen, Nord-Trøndelag, NorwayHolien 11926-A64°03′10“N11° 32′18“EJF744854JF744942JF744774
SANG199Steinkjer, W of Lauvåsen, Nord-Trøndelag, NorwayHolien 11926-B64°03′10“N11° 32′18“EJF744855JF744943JF744775
SANG228Tokositna River, Denali National Park, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 2782462°39.148′N150°47.410′WJF744857JF744776
SANG236Along Hwy. 26 SE of Mt. Hood, Wasco Co., Oregon, U.S.A.Spribille 29881-C45°09.666′N121°38.636′WJF744858JF744944JF744777
SANG237Along Hwy. 26 SE of Mt. Hood, Wasco Co., Oregon, U.S.A.Spribille 29881-D45°09.666′N121°38.636′WJF744859JF744906
SANG242Along Hwy. 26 SE of Mt. Hood, Wasco Co., Oregon, U.S.A.Spribille 29881-I45°09.666′N121°38.636′WJF744860JF744945JF744778
SANG245Chilkoot Trail, Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park, Alaska, U.S.A.Spribille 27038-B59°34.652′N135°19.766′WJF744878JF744946
SANG267Dawson Falls, Wells Gray Prov. Park, British Columbia, CanadaSpribille 2615151°57.824′N120°07.695′WJF744861JF744947JF744779
SANG329West Twin Provincial Park, British Columbia, CanadaSpribille 29832-A53°26.379′N120°30.390′WJF744862JF744948JF744780
SANG398Between Umal’ta and Nimakan Rivers, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3160351°47.546′N133°21.122′EJF744863JF744907
SANG410Stream ‘Lesosechnaya’, Etkil’-Yankanskiy Mountains, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3133051°47.285′N135°39.166′EJF744864JF744949JF744781
SANG436Sredniy Khrebet, between streams Studeniy and Zvuchnaya, near Lazarev, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3094952°13.451′N141°00.428′EJF744950JF744782
SANG446Mountain ‘Arbat’, De Kastri, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3074351°25.171′N140°44.404′EJF744865JF744783
SANG447Mountain ‘Arbat’, De Kastri, Khabarovskiy Krai, RussiaSpribille 3074451°25.171′N140°44.404′EJF744951JF744784
SANG481Arvidsjaur Parish, Pite Lappmark, SwedenMuggia s.n.65.983340°N19.345340°EJF744952JF744785
SANG493Mt. O-akan, Kushiro Subprefecture, Hokkaido, JapanOhmura 674643°26′41.8“N144°09′02.9“EJF744866JF744953JF744786
SANG498Mt. O-akan, Kushiro Subprefecture, Hokkaido, JapanOhmura 675043°26′41.8“N144°09′02.9“EJF744954
SANG503Mt. O-akan, Kushiro Subprefecture, Hokkaido, JapanOhmura 673843°26′41.8“N144°09′02.9“EJF744874JF744955
SANG543Along Route 138 N of Les Escoumins, Québec, CanadaSpribille & Clayden s.n.48°25.481′N69°19.375′WJF744856JF744956JF744787
SANG547Gaspesie, Rte 132 E of Claridorme, Québec, CanadaSpribille & Wagner, 02.10.09, s.n.49°07.689′N64°44.277′WJF744868JF744957JF744788
SANG550Gaspesie, Québec, CanadaSpribille & Wagner, 01.10.09, s.n.48°56.591′N66°01.705′WJF744870JF744908
SANG551Mt. Mansfield, Lamoille Co., Vermont, U.S.A.Spribille & Wagner, 24.09.09, s.n.44° 32.173′N72° 48.897′WJF744867JF744958JF744789
SANG559Mt. Ascutney, Vermont, U.S.A.Spribille 3219343°26.744′N72°27.104′WJF744873JF744959JF744790
SANG591Šumava Mtns., S. Bohemia, Czech RepublicPalice & Printzen s.n.48°47.4′N013°52.4′EJF744876JF744960JF744791
SANG5987.5 km E of Ladva village, Leningrad Oblast’, RussiaStepanchikova & Himelbrant s.n.60°23′22“N35°11°27“EJF744869JF744961JF744792
SANG605LaBiche River, Yukon Territory, CanadaSpribille 2830560°09.037′N124°05.385′WJF744877JF744987
SANG637Loch an Eilein, Scotland, U.K.Ellis s.n.57°8′43.926“N3°50′15.319“WJF744871JF744793
SANG775Sokhondinskiy Zapovednik, Zabaikalskiy Krai, RussiaYakovchenko s.n.50° 52.429′N113° 22.341′EJF744962



Tephromela atra s.ampl.
TEPH629Fraser Canyon, British Columbia, CanadaBjörk 1805749°38.5′N121°24.6′WJF744875JF744986JF744821
Dilutions (mostly 5 × 10−2) of the genomic DNA extractions were used to obtain PCR products for the three markers. We screened a set of about ten molecular markers for a balance of reliability of obtaining PCR products and sufficient levels of sequence variability, finally selecting three loci for this study: two protein-coding genes, namely translation elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α) and the DNA replication licensing factor mini-chromosome maintenance complex 7 (Mcm7), and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) (Table 2). 25 μl PCR reactions were performed with Illustra Ready-To-Go RT-PCR Beads (GE Healthcare) in a thermocycler (AlphaMetrix) using the following programs: EF1-α: initial denaturation 2 min at 95 °C, touchdown 9 cycles: 95 °C 1 min, 66–57 °C 30 s, 72 °C 1 min, followed by 36 cycles 95 °C 30 s, 56 °C 30 s, 72 °C 1 min and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C; ITS: initial denaturation 95 °C 3 min, 35 cycles 95 °C 1 min, 52 °C 1 min, 72 °C 1.5 min, final extension 72 °C 7 min; Mcm7: initial denaturation 10 min at 95 °C, touchdown 6 cycles: 95 °C 45 s, 60–55 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min, followed by 38 cycles: 95 °C 45 s, 56 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min and a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. 2 μl aliquots of PCR products were viewed on 1% agarose gels stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, VWR) and subsequently purified with NucleoSpin Extract II Kit (Macherey–Nagel). PCR product sequencing was outsourced to Macrogen, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). Obtained sequence fragments were obtained electronically from Macrogen, subjected to a BLAST search to control for correct taxonomic neighborhood and checked for electropherogram ambiguities in BioEdit (Hall, 1999). All DNA sequences were submitted to GenBank and are retrievable under the accession numbers given in Table 1.
Table 2

Markers and primers used in this study.

LocusAbbreviationPrimer namePrimer sequence (5–3)Source
Elongation factor 1-αEF1-αEF983GCYCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTTYATRehner and Buckley (2005)
EF2218RATGACACCRACRGCRACRGTYTGRehner and Buckley (2005)



Internal transcribed spacerITSITS1FCTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAAWhite et al. (1990)
ITS4TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGCWhite et al. (1990)



Mini-chromosome maintenance complex 7MCM7MCM7–709fACIMGIGTITCVGAYGTHAARCCSchmitt et al. (2009)
MCM71348revGAYTTDGCIACICCIGGRTCWCCCATSchmitt et al. (2009)

Phylogenetic analyses

Alignments were performed using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 1994) and subsequently optimized by hand in BioEdit (Hall, 1999). Ambiguous and non-conserved regions were removed using Gblocks (Talavera and Castresana, 2007). Nucleotide substitution models were determined for each fragment and individually for the first, second and third codon position of protein-coding genes using jModelTest (Posada, 2008) according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Individual gene alignments were analyzed using a maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. The three fragments were tested for conflict in the phylogenetic signal using a partition homogeneity test implemented in PAUP∗ 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002) using 500 bootstrap replicates and employing an heuristic search with simple addition of sequences. Maximum likelihood analyses were performed using the program PhyML (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003). Bootstrapping was carried out on 500 tree replicates. Bayesian MCMC analyses were performed using the program MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001). The analyses were performed using substitution models approximated by jModeltest (see above). For each analysis, a run with 8 million generations starting with a random tree and running six simultaneous heated chains was employed. Every 100th tree was sampled and saved to a file. The first 500,000 generations (5000 trees) were discarded as chain ‘burn-in’. The program TRACER v. 1.5 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/) was used to assess whether likelihood values had reached stationarity within the allocated burn-in window by plotting log likelihood ratios against the number of generations. In addition, we examined the distributions of split frequencies using the online program AWTY (Nylander et al., 2007) to test whether runs had converged, independent of apparent stationarity detected in TRACER. Of the remaining 75,001 trees a majority consensus tree with averaged branch lengths and annotated with posterior probability values at every node was calculated using the sumt command in MrBayes. Only clades that received bootstrap values ⩾70% in ML and posterior probabilities ⩾0.95 were considered significant. Phylogenetic trees were visualized in TreeView (Page, 1996). Variable sites and nucleotide composition were calculated using MEGA 5 (Tamura et al., 2007); saturation plots were generated using DAMBE (Xia and Xie, 2001).

Polymorphism and divergence

In order to better visualize differences within and between clades, we employed three measures. Within clades, nucleotide diversity was quantified using the average number of nucleotide differences among sequences in a sample, π (Nei and Li, 1979). Divergence between clades was quantified using the pairwise average number of nucleotide substitutions per site between groups (D, Nei and Kumar, 2000). Finally, genetic differentiation (Fst; Hudson et al., 1992) was calculated between clades as a complementary measure of distance weighted by haplotype frequencies within each clade. We defined the groups we compared based on clade assignment of each individual in the three gene phylogeny. Calculations of π and D were carried out using DnaSP (Librado and Rozas, 2009) and Fst was calculated using Arlequin v. 3.11 (Excoffier et al., 2005).

Morphological and chemical analyses

To test whether our phylogenetic results could be matched by morphological traits, we sorted specimens under a Leica Wild M3Z dissecting scope and examined anatomical sections in water with a Zeiss Axioskop light microscope fitted with a ZeissAxioCam MRc5 digital camera; images of growth habit were digitally optimized using CombineZM open source image processing software (www.hadleyweb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/CZM/). Pigments were examined under the light microscope and named according to Meyer and Printzen (2000). In addition, we examined specimens for chemical patterns that could support phylogenetic differentiation using thin layer chromatography. This analysis was carried out on all specimens for which DNA sequences had also been obtained, using methods outlined by Culberson (1972) with modifications following Culberson and Johnson (1982). We used silica-coated glass plates (Macherey–Nagel 821 030) run their full length in solvent systems A, B′ and C. Aliphatic acids were visualized by immersing completely dried plates post-development into a tank of water for 1–2 s, quickly dripping off the plates and marking spots over the next 4–5 min.

Results

Data characteristics and model selection

We obtained a total of 247 new sequences, including 83 from EF1-α, 83 from ITS and 81 from Mcm7, including the first modern documentation of the species M. glabrescens. Following exclusion of positions with missing data, the sequences consisted of 697, 494 and 493 characters, respectively, for a combined total of 1684 characters (Table 3). The partition homogeneity test indicated no significant conflict between the three loci (P = 0.69400).
Table 3

Sequence attributes of markers used in this study; n = number of sequences, var sites = variable sites (total in alignment/total minus outgroup and FUC600); selected model using jModeltest.

Data set/partitionSitesnVar sitesAverage nucleotide composition
Selected model
T(U)CAG
EF1-α (full dataset)69783181/13922.128.824.125.0TPM1ef + G
 Codon position 123324/211319.731.235.8TIM3 + G
 Codon position 223217/152523.633.717.4TPM2uf + G
 Codon position 3232140/1032843.27.421.6TPM2uf + G
ITS49483166/13724.228.421.226.2TrNef + G
MCM7 (full dataset)49381183/13624.426.229.020.4HKY + G
 Codon position 116526/211926.127.327.8TrNef
 Codon position 216416/122824.534.213.4TIM3
 Codon position 3164 141/1032728.025.619.8TPM2
The nucleotide substitution models selected for our loci vary among genes and codon positions (Table 3). Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of gene trees was conducted using codon-based partitioning while models calculated for entire fragments were used in the partitioned concatenated analysis and for maximum likelihood calculations. Codon-based partitioning resulted in almost no difference in topology compared to calculations run with a single model applied to the whole fragment (data not shown). Stationarity was reached early in all gene trees (before 100,000 generations) and in the partitioned Bayesian analysis of concatenated data based on plotting of log likelihoods against generation. Comparisons of split frequencies between runs and in cumulative split frequency plots in AWTY likewise indicated that run convergence had been reached well before the burn-in threshold of 500,000 generations. Variability in the markers increased in the order of EF1-α (25.9% of sites variable) to ITS (33.6%) to Mcm7 (37.1%; Table 3). A considerable amount of this variability was derived from the outgroup and the single sequence of M. fucatus (FUC600) (Table 3). In the two protein-coding genes, the majority of variability was concentrated in the third codon position, in both cases with 77% of variable sites found at this position. Saturation plots (Supplementary Fig. S1) indicate continuous near-linear divergence of transitions and transversions over genetic distance in the case of EF1-α both with and without consideration of the outgroup, while in Mcm7 a transition plateau is reached at a Felsenstein 84 distance of about 1.4, suggesting that saturation has been reached at that position in Mcm7 (Supplementary Fig. S1C). This effect is however mitigated if the outgroup and sequence FUC600 are removed (Supplementary Fig. S1D).

Phylogenetic analysis of gene trees and geographic patterns

Maximum likelihood and Bayesian gene tree calculations produced concordant topologies for the concatenated data set (Fig. 1) and EF1-α (Supplementary Fig. S2), but topological differences were observed between the two methods at one node each in ITS and Mcm7 (Supplementary Figs. S3-S6). All gene trees and the partitioned analyses of the concatenated data provide strong support for Mycoblastus affinis, M. glabrescens and M. sanguinarius s.lat. as monophyletic groups (posterior probability = 1.0, bootstrap = 98–100%). Individuals of M. alpinus are nested within M. affinis in all loci and are not supported. M. fucatus, for which only ITS and Mcm7 was available, occurs outside of the group of studied species and consistently close to the outgroup, Tephromela atra. M. japonicus, for which only ITS was available, is strongly supported in this locus as sister to M. affinis (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4). The sister group relationships of the species-level taxa are not well supported except for two cases: (1) M. glabrescens is supported as sister to M. sanguinarius s.lat. in both the Bayesian MCMC and ML Mcm7 phylogenies, as well as in the partitioned analyses of the concatenated data set; and (2) M. affinis is supported as sister to the group including M. glabrescens and M. sanguinarius s.lat. in the ML ITS phylogeny and both Mcm7 phylogenies as well as in the concatenated data set (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Bayesian MCMC consensus tree of concatenated EF1-α, ITS and Mcm7 gene sequences. Posterior probabilities >95% are shown as thick branches; bootstrap support results of maximum likelihood analysis are shown where >70%. Names in red indicate individuals with the red pigment mysaquinone in the apothecia. Thallus secondary chemistry is shown in the bar to the right of the tree. Abbreviations: bourg, bourgeanic acid; cap, caperatic acid; lich, lichesterinic acid; neph, nephrosterinic acid; proto, protolichesterinic acid; rang, rangiformic acid; plan, planaic acid; FPC, fumarprotocetraric acid. Phe denotes phenolic compounds. All individuals also contain the depside atranorin.

Within M. sanguinarius s.lat., a deep and well supported split is found in the concatenated data set (Fig. 1) between a likewise well supported clade including specimens of the Tasmanian M. sanguinarioides (Clade I) and material of M. sanguinarius s.str. (Clade II). This relationship is also found in all gene phylogenies except the Mcm7 ML tree (Supplementary Fig. S6). Each of the two M. sanguinarius s.lat. clades is again split into recurrent groups. Within-clade patterns in Clade I (=M. sanguinarioides) differ between the three genes. In the topology of EF1-α and the concatenated analyses, the larger of two subclades shares the eastern North American-eastern Asian distribution of M. sanguinarius Clade IIb, while the smaller clade is restricted to western North America. The two geographical types are mixed in the ITS gene tree and in Mcm7 the Tasmanian clade is not supported. We recognize here two clades (Ia and Ib) in the concatenated data set corresponding to material from the southern and northern hemispheres, respectively. Most of the six groups in Clade II (=M. sanguinarius s.str.) are strongly differentiated and recurrent between genes. ‘Clade’ IIa is in fact a terminal branch represented by a single specimen from the Yukon, Canada whose position within M. sanguinarius s.str. is unresolved; its chemistry and ecology also proved aberrant (see below). Clade IIb occurs primarily in eastern North America, the Russian Far East, and northern Sweden, with a single specimen from Alaska; it recurs in all three loci and is strongly supported in EF1-α, the Mcm7 ML analysis and in the concatenated data set. Clade IIb occupies a rather isolated position among the M. sanguinarius s.str. clades, occurring as sister to the rest of M. sanguinarius s.str. in the concatenated phylogeny (Fig. 1) and even together with Clade I in a strongly supported sister group to the rest of Clade II in the Mcm7 ML tree (Supplementary Fig. S6). Clade IIc is represented by a small number of individuals from Hokkaido, Japan and the Russian Far East. Clades IId, IIe and IIf are closely related and occur in all three loci, except in EF1-α where Clades IId and IIf are indistinguishable. Clade IId is found almost entirely in western North America, with a few specimens from northern Sweden; Clade IIe was found only in western North America; and Clade IIf was found only in Europe. All groups within M. sanguinarius s.str. are strongly supported in the partitioned Bayesian analysis of the concatenated data set, while only groups IIc, IId and IIe receive strong bootstrap support in the ML analysis. Pairwise divergence between clades measured in terms of average number of nucleotide substitutions per site (D) was consistently highest, as would be expected, between the subclades of the major Clades I (=M. sanguinarioides) and II (=M. sanguinarius; Table 4). In the pairwise comparison of Clades I and II, ITS showed the greatest divergence, with values of 0.06240–0.07375 in ITS, followed by EF1-α (0.04790–0.05657) and Mcm7 (0.01623–0.04199). Lower D values were observed between the subclades of Clade II, with the highest divergence here being found within Mcm7 (up to 0.02480), with similar D values between ITS and EF1-α. The anomalous position of Clade IIb within the M. sanguinarius s.str. clade is again visible in the D values, with Clade IIb exhibiting very low D values in pairwise comparisons with Clade I (=M. sanguinarioides) and comparatively high D values in pairwise match-ups with Clades IIc–IIf.
Table 4

Genetic differentiation (Fst values, above diagonal), genetic divergence (D, below diagonal) and within-clade nucleotide diversity (per site π, diagonal, in bold) in the subclades of the Mycoblastus sanguinarius group. π is zero when only one haplotype is present in a subclade. Clade IIa is not represented because it consists of only a single individual. Fst values: *pairwise comparison significant following Bonferroni correction (P ⩽ 0.0012).

IaIbIIbIIcIIdIIeIIf
EF1-α
Clade Ia0.00000.703701.000001.000000.988701.000000.99768
Clade Ib0.009140.00270.97504*0.94799*0.96788*0.96498*0.98394*
Clade IIb0.052080.051700.00031.00000*0.96491*1.00000*0.98941*
Clade IIc0.050310.047900.006610.00000.922211.000000.98240*
Clade IId0.052670.050140.008550.007320.00050.80254*0.04932
Clade IIe0.053050.049660.009700.008590.001880.00000.94089*
Clade IIf0.056570.051670.009520.007600.000410.001890.0001



ITS
Clade Ia0.00870.677060.989501.000000.98094*0.991411.00000*
Clade Ib0.015610.00220.94983*0.94024*0.94941*0.93722*0.97979*
Clade IIb0.062400.066030.00400.97540*0.94347*0.94595*0.99123*
Clade IIc0.070690.067720.021070.00000.94967*0.98039*1.00000*
Clade IId0.073750.069420.020100.017870.00120.88998*0.97741*
Clade IIe0.066530.066600.013220.017080.013630.00090.99393*
Clade IIf0.070020.070050.011160.013250.013770.009070.0000



MCm7
Clade Ia0.00000.296221.000000.868130.896161.00000*0.97961
Clade Ib0.005170.00560.89676*0.86768*0.88373*0.92231*0.95262*
Clade IIb0.016230.022680.00000.92225*0.89605*1.00000*0.97221*
Clade IIc0.033920.039860.020650.00680.51065*0.84576*0.89364*
Clade IId0.035370.040130.024280.008370.00310.85075*0.89819*
Clade IIe0.034860.040360.021790.012700.019000.00000.79000*
Clade IIf0.036280.041990.020620.009960.017810.002800.0040
Fst values were highest between clades in EF1-α (both within and between the subclades of Clades I and II), with intermediate values in ITS, and the lowest values in Mcm7 (Table 4). Two exceptions to the high values are the pairings of Clades IId and IIf, which are not distinguishable in EF1-α (see above and Supplementary Fig. S2) and accordingly have a low Fst value; and Clades IIc and IId in Mcm7, which both occur on a single well supported branch, with each Clade IIc sequence constituting a unique haplotype, lowering the Fst value. The sequence diversity within Clades IIc and IId is also expressed in terms of per site π values, which in Clade IIc is the highest of any clade (Table 4). Values for π were otherwise low overall, being the highest in clades with heterogeneous sequence assemblages, especially Clade Ib.

Morphological and chemical data

An initial comparison of material from Clades I and II did not reveal any obvious morphological differences. Specimens from Clade I tended to have pruinose young apothecia (Fig. 2A) surrounded by whitish thalline material, and the apothecia were flatter when mature than the apothecia of specimens from Clade II (Fig. 2D), but this was not a consistent predictor of clade assignment. Mysaquinone pigmentation was consistently found in Clade II but occasionally absent from specimens in Clade I, but its presence or absence in an apothecium was variable even within individuals from a single site. We detected slight differences of the hymenial pigmentation, with apothecia from specimens of Clade II possessing more intense pigmentation of Cinereorufa-green than individuals of Clade I. No differences were noticed in ascospore size. Both clades have one ascospore per ascus. However, systematic examination of apothecial cross-sections revealed that, without exception, all individuals of Clade I possessed microscopic birefringent crystals in the apothecial hymenium (Figs. 2C) which were always lacking in individuals of Clade II (Fig. 2F). The internal hymenial crystals are sometimes also externally visible in the form of a light pruina on the surface of the apothecia (Fig. 2A), especially when young, in contrast to the smooth, waxy black apothecia of M. sanguinarius (Fig. 2D).
Fig. 2

Habit and key morphological characteristics of Mycoblastus sanguinarioides (A–C) and M. sanguinarius (D–F). A and D, habit; B and E, sections of apothecium, in water (light microscope); C and F, the same sections as in B and E shown in polarized light. A from Bijoux Falls, British Columbia (Spribille 26158, GZU), B–C from Chilkoot Trail, southeast Alaska (Spribille 27038-C, GZU) and D–F from Mt. Ascutney, Vermont (Spribille 32196, GZU).

Chemical profiles were obtained from all 82 specimens of Mycoblastus sanguinarius s.lat. and are depicted in Fig. 1. We found six distinct fatty acid combinations: bourgeanic acid alone (Bourg), caperatic acid alone (Cap), lichesterinic and protolichesterinic acid (Lich + Proto), rangiformic/norrangiformic acids alone (Rang), and the unique combinations Bourg + Rang and Bourg + Cap. One specimen (SAID85) had no detectable fatty acids after two runs. In addition, the fatty acid nephrosterinic acid (Neph) was detected in M. glabrescens and the depside planaic acid (Plan) and depsidone fumarprotocetraric acid (FPC) in M. affinis and M. japonicus, respectively. When tested categorically, fatty acid profiles in the M. sanguinarius complex are sufficiently correlated with clades (Χ2 = 370.8763, df = 42, p = <2.2 × 10−16; φ-coefficient = 2.126707) that they can be used in part to predict clade assignment. The Bourg and Cap profiles are unique to clades Ia and Ib, respectively, and the Bourg + Cap profile is found only in Clade IIf. Clades IIb through IIe are united by a common motif of profiles with Rang alone or in combination with Bourg; both sets occur in western North America, where they always belong to either Clade IId (Rang alone; individual SANG181 is from Sweden) or Clade IIe (Bourg + Rang). A similar, though less pronounced pattern is evident between Clades IIb and IIc in eastern Asia (Fig. 1). We note that one of the characters heretofore used to distinguish M. sanguinarioides (Clade I) from M. sanguinarius (Clade II), namely that M. sanguinarioides has Cap and never Bourg, is not supported by our data, but that the two fatty acid profiles of M. sanguinarioides (Cap and Bourg) are so far unique to that clade as these substances always occur in combination with other substances in M. sanguinarius s.str. according to our data.

Discussion

Reassessing the circumscription of Mycoblastus sanguinarius

Our results suggest that considerable diversity is concealed behind what has been long regarded as a single, circumboreal lichen species. Specifically, our data support scenario number three in our introduction, namely that forms with the red pigment mysaquinone are distinct from the unpigmented M. affinis, and that there is more than one species involved. The first of these, M. japonicus, is represented in our study by a single specimen, but has been previously recognized and will not be discussed further here. The second (=Clade I) corresponds to the recently described Tasmanian species M. sanguinarioides and is herewith reported as new to the northern hemisphere, where it is widespread and in fact more common than in the southern hemisphere. M. sanguinarioides is a classic example of a cryptic species, with specimens having passed through the hands of lichenologists since the middle of the 19th century and yet only once recognized as unique, by Nylander (1890), as Lecidea sanguinaria var. lecanoroidea, from Japan (holotype specimen at Helsinki, seen by the first author). It was not recognized at the species level until Kantvilas (2009) provided it a name based on material from Tasmania, where it occurs disjunctly. Kantvilas’ circumscription of M. sanguinarioides almost completely overlaps with characters also found in M. sanguinarius, and the morphological characters detected in the present study (presence of hymenial crystals) are much more reliable for distinguishing it from M. sanguinarius. Mysaquinone is a facultative pigment in the Tasmanian populations (Kantvilas, 2009) and the same holds true in populations we sampled in the Russian Far East, where it almost always lacks the pigment, and northeastern North America, where pigment-deficient forms are common. Unpigmented forms of M. sanguinarioides likely account for many reports of M. affinis from these regions. Nearly all specimens sampled in western North America contained this pigment. The third red-pigmented species (Clade II) corresponds to M. sanguinarius s.str. Clade II is an interesting case because it is a well supported monophyletic group only in the gene tree of EF1-α and the concatenated three-gene data set; in the analyses of ITS and Mcm7 it is not supported. One reason for this may be the relatively isolated position of its ‘eastern’ clades, especially Clade IIb. Clades IIa through IIc occupy an isolated position from the rest of M. sanguinarius in the ITS phylogeny and are even reciprocally monophyletic to it in EF1-α. Individuals of Clade IIb are however morphologically and chemically closer to M. sanguinarius s.str.; they lack the birefringent hymenial crystals typical of M. sanguinarioides and share the same chemical profile as M. sanguinarius Clade IId. Resolving the relationships and distinctness of this clade may be connected to the status of the chemically unique individual SANG605 (Clade IIa), which is close to Clade IIb, and which is known so far from a single mountain in the Yukon, Canada, where it was found growing over rock. It cannot be ruled out that potentially undiscovered strains close to Clade IIb might remain to be discovered and could help resolve its relationships. The placement of Mycoblastus alpinus nested within M. affinis appears to lend support to recent suspicions of northern European taxonomists that the two may be conspecific (Tønsberg, 1992; James and Watson, 2009). However, variation within M. affinis deserves further sampling as at least two individuals are significantly differentiated from the core of M. affinis especially in the EF1-α phylogram. At the same time, the strong support for the distinctness of M. glabrescens is noteworthy as currently the only way to distinguish it from M. affinis, other than DNA, is by chemistry. M. glabrescens was a forgotten species for more than a century until it was resurrected by Kantvilas (2009), and the first modern collections are those reported in this study. The mycobiont of M. sanguinarius s.lat. joins a suite of other fungi in which molecular-level studies have revealed unforeseen geographic structure and cryptic lineages in what were previously thought large continuous ranges. Amanita muscaria, a circumboreal ectomycorrhizal fungus occurring in many of the same general areas as M. sanguinarius, has also been shown to possess strong geographic differentiation within its global population (Geml et al., 2006, 2008), although the geographic patterns do not closely approximate those we have found. Molecular investigations have revealed cryptic fungal species lineages in widespread and well-known lichen species such as Letharia vulpina (Kroken and Taylor, 2001) and Parmelina quercina (Argüello et al., 2007; for a review see Crespo and Pérez-Ortega, 2009). To the extent this can be considered a trend in other groups, it signals that lichens are conservative in adhering to or reverting to morphological motifs, rendering recognition of phylogenetic species challenging.

Phylogenetic signal among the markers

Much of the phylogenetic signal in our study is contributed by ITS and Mcm7, with the least variability in EF1-α. In general, alignment of all three fragments was straightforward except for several short variable regions in ITS and a variable 50 BP section around position 500 (in our alignment) in EF1-α, which were excised by Gblocks. Of particular interest was the performance of the Mcm7 gene. Mcm7 has only recently begun to be used for phylogenetic studies in lichenized fungi (Schmitt et al., 2009; Leavitt et al., 2011). Mcm7 is a single-copy gene coding for one of a family of DNA replication licensing factors, originally identified from yeast, and later from higher eukaryotes (Kearsey and Labib, 1998). Despite the highly degenerated primers, we found it relatively easy to obtain from fresh DNA extractions although the ability to obtain sequencable PCR products quickly declined over time, unlike with multicopy ribosomal DNA regions such as ITS. The phylogenetic signal provided by Mcm7, as shown in Supplementary Figs. S5 and S6, is more sub-structured than that of EF1-α and comparable to that of ITS. Mcm7 exhibited the lowest level of sequence divergence between M. sanguinarioides and M. sanguinarius in pairwise nucleotide diversity and the lowest Fst values compared to EF1-α and ITS. Of the three markers used here, Mcm7 reported the highest proportion of variable sites and a higher level of ts-saturation at the third codon position than EF1-α (Supplementary Fig. S1). The detection of any kind of saturation at such a low taxonomic level contrasts with the statement by Schmitt et al. (2009) that Mcm7 distinguishes itself from ribosomal markers such as ITS and mitochondrial small subunit in not exhibiting saturation, making it suitable for use at the genus level and above. The level of saturation and variability is clearly reduced when excluding the most dissimilar sequences in our dataset (Mycoblastus fucatus and the outgroup; Supplementary Fig. S1), but the observed ts-saturation with inclusion of even closely related taxa such as these suggests that saturation and homoplasy should be carefully monitored when using this marker to recover gene phylogenies.

Evolutionary significance of chemotypes

Mycoblastus sanguinarius is not unique amongst lichens in including an array of fatty acid profiles. Indeed, many common lichen genera include species with multiple fatty acid strains. While these strains have sometimes been accorded taxonomic rank (e.g., Cladonia: Culberson, 1986; Lepraria: Fehrer et al., 2008), they are more often treated as ‘chemotypes’ (e.g., Parmelia: Hale, 1987; Tephromela s.lat.: Haugan and Timdal, 1994). Fatty acids were poorly studied in early studies of lichen secondary chemistry and it was long believed they were not of taxonomic significance. Though richly represented in some of the largest lichen genera (Lecanora, Pertusaria) they have been all but omitted from reviews of lichen chemistry (Hawksworth, 1976; Lumbsch, 1998). Their functional significance is not well understood, but available evidence points to a role in chemical protection. Protolichesterinic acid, a fatty acid reported here from Mycoblastus for the first time, has been shown to have antibiotic properties (Huneck, 2001); it is the active compound of ‘Icelandic moss’ used in pharmaceuticals (Ingolfsdottir et al., 1997) and has been shown to inhibit bacterial growth in culture (Türk et al., 2003). Lawrey (1983) found evidence of caperatic acid, which we found in both M. sanguinarioides and M. sanguinarius, being an active antiherbivory agent in the lichen genus Allocetraria. A noteworthy feature of fatty acid variation in M. sanguinarius s.lat. is the recurring nature of fatty acid profiles. Chemotype development in M. sanguinarioides and M. sanguinarius appears to have bifurcated in parallel, with both taxa developing similar Cap- and Bourg-dominated profiles. Parallelism also occurs within M. sanguinarius s.str. with two of the fatty acid profiles we found (Bourg + Rang and Rang), occurring side-by-side in two regions (western North America and East Asia), though belonging to different clades in each case. In some cases we found different clades/chemotypes to occur side-by-side in the same forest stand (unpublished data). Various instances of chemical parallelism in lichens have been reported, including several involving fatty acids. Clayden (1992) reported two geographically separated fatty acid strains developing parallel phenolic chemotypes in Arctoparmelia. In an apparent extension of the phenomenon, Culberson and Culberson (1973) reported parallel morphotypes developing in parallel chemotypes in the genus Parmotrema and later (1977) in the genus Cetrelia; Leuckert and Poelt (1989) found parallelism of xanthone chemotypes in Lecanora. All of these cases of chemical parallelism have in common their occurrence at low taxonomic rank, i.e., they are presumably recent descendants of a common ancestor. Hale (1961), in an early review of the value of lichen chemistry in systematics, presciently noted that “we cannot overlook the possibility that strain formation is a forerunner of morphological differentiation and a process of speciation”. Our data provide further evidence that taxonomists and evolutionary biologists should be careful before dismissing chemotypes as within-taxon ‘variability’ as has sometimes been done in the past. Culberson et al. (1985) suspected a close connection between chemosyndromic development and evolution and explored the potential role of photobiont interaction in controlling this process. Our data strongly support the connection between genotype and chemotype in the fungus of Mycoblastus sanguinarius, which while not ruling out a role for the photobiont in fine-scale chemical differentiation during incipient speciation events, does confirm that genetic differentiation becomes fixed in the fungal partner. More data are required to triangulate on this phenomenon and narrow down the possible role of the photobiont in fatty acid profile expression. Secondary substance profiles in lichens, including difficult-to-detect or ‘accessory’ substances, can provide a window into diversification processes across ecological and geographical space and may be the early external manifestations of as yet unclarified selective processes.

Conclusions

Estimates of the true number of species of fungi range as high as 1.5 million (Hawksworth, 1991), whereby only about 80,000 have been described until now, including nearly 19,000 lichenized and lichenicolous fungi (Feuerer and Hawksworth, 2007). ‘Cryptic species’ have been put forward as a candidate group to account for some of the substantial discrepancy between these numbers (Hawksworth, 2001; Crespo and Pérez-Ortega, 2009), and the tropics are frequently invoked as the regions to search for the overlooked taxa (Hawksworth and Rossman, 1997). There are indications however that, for lichenized fungi at least, some of the highest lichen species diversity has so far been found at high latitudes (Spribille et al., 2010). Circumboreal species complexes like that of M. sanguinarius and other common lichens may prove to be fruitful taxonomic groups for mining previously unsuspected biodiversity as the focus of on-the-ground research shifts from identification key-based floristics to molecular-assisted biodiversity inventory.
  26 in total

1.  DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution.

Authors:  X Xia; Z Xie
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 2.  New results on the chemistry of lichen substances.

Authors:  S Huneck
Journal:  Fortschr Chem Org Naturst       Date:  2001

3.  Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data.

Authors:  R R Hudson; M Slatkin; W P Maddison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics.

Authors:  Johan A A Nylander; James C Wilgenbusch; Dan L Warren; David L Swofford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Beringian origins and cryptic speciation events in the fly agaric (Amanita muscaria).

Authors:  J Geml; G A Laursen; K O'neill; H C Nusbaum; D L Taylor
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Species delimitation and evolution in morphologically and chemically diverse communities of the lichen-forming genus Xanthoparmelia (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) in western North America.

Authors:  Steven D Leavitt; Leigh Johnson; Larry L St Clair
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Improved conditions and new data for the identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chromatographic method.

Authors:  C F Culberson
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1972-10-05

9.  A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs.

Authors:  Stephen A Rehner; Ellen Buckley
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  New primers for promising single-copy genes in fungal phylogenetics and systematics.

Authors:  I Schmitt; A Crespo; P K Divakar; J D Fankhauser; E Herman-Sackett; K Kalb; M P Nelsen; N A Nelson; E Rivas-Plata; A D Shimp; T Widhelm; H T Lumbsch
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 11.051

View more
  7 in total

1.  Molecular support for the recognition of the Mycoblastus fucatus group as the new genus Violella (Tephromelataceae, Lecanorales).

Authors:  Toby Spribille; Bernard Goffinet; Barbara Klug; Lucia Muggia; Walter Obermayer; Helmut Mayrhofer
Journal:  Lichenologist       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.514

2.  Taxonomic recognition of some species-level lineages circumscribed in nominal Rhizoplaca subdiscrepans s. lat. (Lecanoraceae, Ascomycota).

Authors:  Katarzyna Szczepańska; Jacek Urbaniak; Lucyna Śliwa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Using phylogenetic and coalescent methods to understand the species diversity in the Cladia aggregata complex (Ascomycota, Lecanorales).

Authors:  Sittiporn Parnmen; Achariya Rangsiruji; Pachara Mongkolsuk; Kansri Boonpragob; Aparna Nutakki; H Thorsten Lumbsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Coalescent-based species delimitation approach uncovers high cryptic diversity in the cosmopolitan lichen-forming fungal genus Protoparmelia (Lecanorales, Ascomycota).

Authors:  Garima Singh; Francesco Dal Grande; Pradeep K Divakar; Jürgen Otte; Steven D Leavitt; Katarzyna Szczepanska; Ana Crespo; Víctor J Rico; André Aptroot; Marcela Eugenia da Silva Cáceres; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Imke Schmitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota).

Authors:  Xinli Wei; Bruce McCune; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Hui Li; Steven Leavitt; Yoshikazu Yamamoto; Svetlana Tchabanenko; Jiangchun Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phytochemical Investigation of New Algerian Lichen Species: Physcia Mediterranea Nimis.

Authors:  Marwa Kerboua; Monia Ali Ahmed; Nsevolo Samba; Radhia Aitfella-Lahlou; Lucia Silva; Juan F Boyero; Cesar Raposo; Jesus Miguel Lopez Rodilla
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Infraspecific variation of some brown Parmeliae (in Poland) - a comparison of ITS rDNA and non-molecular characters.

Authors:  Katarzyna Szczepańska; Beata Guzow-Krzemińska; Jacek Urbaniak
Journal:  MycoKeys       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.