| Literature DB >> 21443787 |
Rose Njemini1, Ivan Bautmans, Oscar O Onyema, Katrien Van Puyvelde, Christian Demanet, Tony Mets.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heat shock proteins (Hsp) are ubiquitously synthesised in virtually all species and it is hypothesised that they might have beneficial health effects. Recent studies have identified circulating Hsp as an important mediator in inflammation - the effects of low-grade inflammation in the aging process are overwhelming. While much is known about intracellular Hsp70, scant data exist on circulating Hsp70 in the aging context. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of age and disease on circulating Hsp70 and, in particular, to evaluate the association between circulating Hsp70 and inflammatory parameters.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21443787 PMCID: PMC3074541 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2172-12-24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Immunol ISSN: 1471-2172 Impact factor: 3.615
General characteristics of the participants
| 83.4 ± 5.5* | 83.3 ± 5.6* | 74.7 ± 4.7† | 74.2 ± 4.5† | 23.4 ± 3.3 | 22.6 ± 2.5 | |
| 1.71 ± 0.08† | 1.59 ± 0.05† | 1.72 ± 0.05† | 1.60 ± 0.06† | 1.81 ± 0.08 | 1.69 ± 0.05 | |
| 73.5 ± 11.7 | 62.2 ± 10.84$ | 78.7 ± 9.9 | 70.0 ± 12.1† | 76.7 ± 13.3 | 61.5 ± 7.7 | |
| 25.1 ± 3.8 | 24.6 ± 4.1* | 26.7 ± 3.2† | 27.2 ± 4.3† | 23.4 ± 3.8 | 21.7 ± 2.4 | |
| 9.4 ± 4.7* | 8.2 ± 3.8* | 2.6 ± 1.8† | 2.6 ± 1.8† | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 0.9 ± 0.9 | |
| 7.0 ± 2.8* | 6.4 ± 2.9* | 1.4 ± 1.0† | 1.4 ± 1.1† | 0.1 ± 0.4 | 0.0 ± 0.1 | |
| 12.1 ± 4.2* | 13.2 ± 5.4* | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 23.1 ± 5.2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||
Values expressed as mean ± standard deviation, BMI = body mass index; bADL = basic activities of daily life; MMSE = mini-mental state examination; n/a = not available, significantly different *from community-dwelling elderly and young adults, †from young adults, $from community-dwelling elderly (all One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test p < 0.05).
Main diagnosis and Hsp70 serum concentrations among the elderly patients
| Diagnosis | Hsp70 | Inflam/Non-inflam |
|---|---|---|
| 0.42 [0.19; 0.76] | 17/1 | |
| 0.19 [0.19; 0.39] | 11/5 | |
| 0.19 [0.19; 0.21] | 4/7 | |
| 0.19 [0.19; 0.55] | 6/4 | |
| 0.21 [0.19; 1.54] | 6/4 | |
| 0.19 [0.19; 0.19] | 5/4 | |
| 0.19 [0.19; 0.19] | 2/2 | |
| 0.19 [0.19; 0.88] | 0/3 | |
| 0.35 [0.19; 1.81] | 1/2 | |
| 0.19 | 1/1 | |
| 0.19 | 1/0 | |
| 0.24 | 1/0 | |
| 0.23 | 0/1 | |
| 0.19 | 1/0 |
IQR: interquartile range (percentile25; percentile75); no significant difference in Hsp70 concentration between the various diagnostic groups (Kruskall Wallis test p = 0.14; performed for those diagnostic groups with >4 participants); Inflam = inflammatory (CRP serum concentration ≥5 mg/L).
Hsp70 and cytokine serum concentrations
| Parameter | Infl. Geriatric Patients | Non-infl. Geriatric Patients | Community-Dwelling Elderly | Young Adults |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.22 [0.19; 0.58] | 0.19 [0.19; 0.21]† | 0.19 [0.19; 0.50]‡ | 0.40 [0.19; 0.67]‡$ | |
| 29/27 | 9/25† | 47/53‡ | 72/28 † ‡ $ | |
| 27.03 [16.38; 48.84] | 12.78 [8.95; 16.88]† | 13.15 [9.99; 16.99]† | 9.29 [8.56; 11.97]†$ | |
| 46/10 | 13/21† | 28/72† | 19/81 † ‡ | |
| 3.95 [2.69; 6.82] | 4.32 [2.49; 4.91] | 2.09 [1.29; 3.27]†‡ | 0.89 [0.70; 1.46]†‡$ | |
| 10/0 | 21/0 | 71/1 | 63/18‡ | |
| 15.65 [11.87; 21.66] | 12.93 [10.06; 17.99]† | 12.49 [10.81; 15.73]† | 12.07 [10.09; 13.87]†$ | |
| 56/0 | 34/0 | 100/0 | 100/0 | |
| 0.99 [0.99; 2.12] | 0.99 [0.99; 0.99]† | 0.99 [0.99; 1.81]‡ | 1.97 [0.99; 2.97]†‡$ | |
| 19/37 | 5/29† | 45/55‡ | 64/36†‡$ |
IQR = interquartile range (percentile25; percentile 75); Infl = inflammatory (CRP serum concentration ≥5 mg/L); Values based on samples with detectable concentrations only; Standard = standard IL-6 kit with a detection limit of 7.8 pg/mL; Hs = high-sensitivity IL-6 kit with a detection limit of 0.16 pg/mL.
*Significant differences among groups (Kruskall-Wallis test or Chi-Square test p < 0.001); significantly different from †Inflammatory geriatric patients, ‡ Non-inflammatory geriatric patients, $ Community-dwelling elderly (Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-Square test p < 0.05).
Figure 1Hsp70 concentrations in the various categories of participants. Serum Hsp70 levels were significantly higher in the young compared to the elderly subjects. However, when participants with undetectable Hsp70 serum levels - as well as the few outliers - were excluded, the values in the three groups were not significantly different (Kruskall Wallis: p = 0.114).
Relationship between the inflammatory parameters and Hsp70 in patients and control subjects
| Age (years) | CRP (mg/L) | TNF-alpha (pg/mL) | IL-10 (pg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n = 90) | -0.106 | 0.145 | 0.045 | ||
| Controls (n = 200) | NA | -0.035 | -0.118 | -0.041 | |
| Patients (n = 90) | -0.051 | ||||
| Controls (n = 200) | NA | 0.073 | |||
| Patients (n = 90) | 0.117 | ||||
| Controls (n = 200) | NA | ||||
| Patients (n = 90) | 0.110 | ||||
| Controls (n = 200) | NA | ||||
| Patients (n = 90) | -0.029 | ||||
| Controls (n = 200) | NA |
NA = not applicable; Serum samples with the concentration of IL-6 lower than 7.8 pg/mL, which was the lower detection limit for the standard IL-6 kit, were re-analysed using the high-sensitive IL-6 kit with a detection limit of 0.16 pg/mL. In order to bring results for IL-6 obtained by the standard and high-sensitivity assays together, a ranking method was applied whereby the values obtained with the high-sensitivity kit were ranked from low to high followed by the values obtained with the standard kit from low to high. Values represent Spearman's rho correlation coefficients, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.