Literature DB >> 21443641

Remifentanil as single agent to facilitate awake fibreoptic intubation in the absence of premedication.

R Vennila1, A Hall, M Ali, N Bhuiyan, D Pirotta, D A Raw.   

Abstract

Remifentanil is increasingly being used as the primary agent to provide sedation during awake fibreoptic nasal intubation. In this observational study, we aimed to determine the optimal effect site concentration of remifentanil, using a target controlled infusion based on the Minto pharmacological model, to provide optimal safe intubation conditions without the use of other sedatives/premedication and/or spray-as-you-go local anaesthesia. Twenty patients with anticipated difficult airway participated in the study. Good intubating conditions were achieved in all patients with mean (SD) effect site concentration of 6.3 (3.87) ng.ml(-1) of remifentanil recorded at nasal endoscopy and 8.06 (3.52) ng.ml(-1) during tracheal intubation. No serious adverse event occurred during any of these procedures. These preliminary findings suggest that this is a feasible and safe technique for awake fibreoptic nasal intubation.
© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21443641     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06687.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Awake fiberoptic intubation].

Authors:  F Gerheuser; K Gürtler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Comparison of three sedation regimens for drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

Authors:  Jin Sun Cho; Sara Soh; Eun Jung Kim; Hyung-ju Cho; Seokyung Shin; Hye Jin Kim; Bon-Nyeo Koo
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rong Hu; J X Liu; Hong Jiang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Liu; Tao Zhou; Jian-Qi Wei; Wu-Hua Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Propofol alternatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy anesthesia.

Authors:  Basavana Gouda Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10

6.  Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake intubation using a Shikani optical stylet: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Min Li; Cheng Ni; Xiang-Yang Guo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Efficacy of Adding Low-Dose Ketamine to Dexmedetomidine Versus Low-Dose Ketamine and Propofol for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Awake Fiber-optic Intubation.

Authors:  Reem Abdelraouf El Sharkawy
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

8.  A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam with Fentanyl-Midazolam for Sedation during awake Fiberoptic Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway.

Authors:  Urvashi Yadav; Jay Brijesh Singh Yadav; Dhiraj Srivastava; Swati Srivastava
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2020-10-12

9.  Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study.

Authors:  Cheng-Wen Li; Yan-Dong Li; Hai-Tao Tian; Xian-Gang Kong; Kui Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.