Literature DB >> 21443126

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with extended lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer--reports of 82 cases.

Jianjun Du1, Jianyou Zheng, Yongqi Li, Jipeng Li, Gang Ji, Guanglong Dong, Zhi Yang, Weizhong Wang, Zhiqing Gao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: As a result of increased surgeon's experience and the improvement in laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic gastrectomy has been widely accepted for the management of early stage gastric cancer. Sufficient evidence has demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Radical laparoscopic treatment of more advanced gastric cancer is controversial. The purpose of the current study was to determine feasibility and advantage of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) with D2 dissection of lymph nodes in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
METHODOLOGY: Between Nov 2005 and May 2009 in our single institute, 176 patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent total gastrectomy with D2 dissection of lymph nodes. 82 of these patients underwent LTG, 94 underwent OTG. Clinical data of the both procedures were compared. Disease-free survival was studied to assess short-term outcome differences between the groups.
RESULTS: None of 82 patients was converted to laparotomy and no operative mortality was observed in LTG. Postoperative complication rate was 9.8% (8/82) in LTG, compared with 24.5% (23/94) in OTG. No major complications occurred among the all patients who underwent LTG. There were 2 deaths (2/94) due to myocardial infarction in 3 days after OTG. In comparison to OTG, LTG had the longer operating time (275 +/- 78 versus 212 +/- 51 min; p < 0.001), similar number of lymph nodes (34.2 +/- 13.5 versus 36.4 +/- 19.1; p = 0.331), less operative blood loss (156 +/- 112 ml versus 339 +/- 162 ml; p < 0.001), earlier recovery of bowel activity, earlier ambulation and reduced postoperative pain after surgery (p < 0.001). Tumor- free margins were obtained in all patients who underwent LTG. In a mean follow-up period of 22.5 months, local recurrence and metastasis were observed in 19 of 82 patients in LTG, 23 of 94 patients in OTG respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for middle and upper gastric cancer is considered to be a safe and feasible procedure. Short-term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic total gastrectomy with extended lymph nodes were the same as in open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21443126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  24 in total

1.  Totally laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy with a novel, safe, simple, and time-saving anastomosis by only stapling devices.

Authors:  Jianjun Du; Jianbo Shuang; Jipeng Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Liu Hong; Xiongwei Du; Jiazhi Wen; Jin Hua
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Survival and surgical outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: case-control study.

Authors:  Bang Wool Eom; Young-Woo Kim; Sang Eok Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Jun Ho Lee; Hong Man Yoon; Soo-Jeong Cho; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Soo Jin Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for T1 to T2 stage gastric cancer: a pilot study of three ports technique.

Authors:  Anwar Tawfik Amin; Adel Gabr; Hamza Abbas
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-02-07

5.  Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weizhi Wang; Zheng Li; Jie Tang; Meilin Wang; Baolin Wang; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Xiong; Quentin M Nunes; Wei Huang; Chun-Lu Tan; Neng-Wen Ke; Si-Ming Xie; Xun Ran; Hao Zhang; Yong-Hua Chen; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen-Hong Zou; Li-Ying Zhao; Ting-Yu Mou; Yan-Feng Hu; Jiang Yu; Hao Liu; Hao Chen; Jia-Ming Wu; Sheng-Li An; Guo-Xin Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil™): a single institution experience.

Authors:  Guan-Qun Liao; Xiao-Wei Ou; Shi-Qiang Liu; Shao-Rui Zhang; Wen Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  D2 dissection in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ming Cui; Jia-Di Xing; Wei Yang; Yi-Yuan Ma; Zhen-Dan Yao; Nan Zhang; Xiang-Qian Su
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Systematic review of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mikito Inokuchi; Sho Otsuki; Yoshitaka Fujimori; Yuya Sato; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.