Literature DB >> 21442778

Effect of stimulus parameters in the treatment of seizures by electrical stimulation in the kainate animal model.

Pooja Rajdev1, Matthew Ward, Pedro Irazoqui.   

Abstract

Preliminary results from animal and clinical studies demonstrate that electrical stimulation of brain structures can reduce seizure frequency in patients with refractory epilepsy. Since most researchers derive stimulation parameters by trial and error, it is unclear what stimulation frequency, amplitude and duration constitutes a set of optimal stimulation parameters for aborting seizure activity in a given patient. In this investigation, we begin to quantify the independent effects of stimulation parameters on electrographic seizures, such that they could be used to develop an efficient closed-loop prosthesis that intervenes before the clinical onset of a seizure and seizure generalization. Biphasic stimulation is manually delivered to the hippocampus in response to a visually detected electrographic seizure. Such focal, responsive stimulation allows for anti-seizure treatment delivery with improved temporal and spatial specificity over conventional open-loop stimulation paradigms, with the possibility of avoiding tissue damage stemming from excessive exposure to electrical stimulation. We retrospectively examine the effects of stimulation frequency (low, medium and high), pulse-width (low and high) and amplitude (low and high) in seizures recorded from 23 kainic acid treated rats. We also consider the effects of total charge delivered and the rate of charge delivery, and identify stimulation parameter sets that induce after-discharges or more seizures. Among the stimulation parameters evaluated, we note 2 major findings. First, stimulation frequency is a key parameter for inhibiting seizure activity; the anti-seizure effect cannot be attributed to only the charge delivered per phase. Second, an after-discharge curve shows that as the frequency and pulse-width of stimulation increases, smaller pulse amplitudes are capable of eliciting an after-discharge. It is expected that stimulation parameter optimization will lead to devices with enhanced treatment efficacies and reduced side-effect profiles, especially when used in conjunction with seizure prediction or detection algorithms in a closed-loop control application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442778     DOI: 10.1142/S0129065711002730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neural Syst        ISSN: 0129-0657            Impact factor:   5.866


  8 in total

1.  Neurostimulation for epilepsy: do we know the best stimulation parameters?

Authors:  Robert S Fisher
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.500

2.  Frequency dependence of behavioral modulation by hippocampal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Giorgio La Corte; Yina Wei; Nick Chernyy; Bruce J Gluckman; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  High frequency stimulation can suppress globally seizures induced by 4-AP in the rat hippocampus: an acute in vivo study.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Chiang; Chou-Ching K Lin; Ming-Shaung Ju; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Seizure suppression by high frequency optogenetic stimulation using in vitro and in vivo animal models of epilepsy.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Chiang; Thomas P Ladas; Luis E Gonzalez-Reyes; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Should stimulation parameters be individualized to stop seizures: Evidence in support of this approach.

Authors:  Tiwalade Sobayo; David J Mogul
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  Responsive electrical stimulation suppresses epileptic seizures in rats.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Heng Guo; Xiao Yu; Shouyan Wang; Canhua Xu; Feng Fu; Xiaorong Jing; Hua Zhang; Xiuzhen Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prediction of the Seizure Suppression Effect by Electrical Stimulation via a Computational Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Sora Ahn; Sumin Jo; Sang Beom Jun; Hyang Woon Lee; Seungjun Lee
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Dynamic control of modeled tonic-clonic seizure states with closed-loop stimulation.

Authors:  Bryce Beverlin Ii; Theoden I Netoff
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.