Literature DB >> 21442471

Binocular and monocular measurements of subjective visual vertical in vestibular loss.

Yuzuru Sainoo1, M Terakado, D Fujiyama, H Kumagami, H Takahashi.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the possibility to omit the time-consuming monocular vision measurement in the subjective visual vertical (SVV) test by demonstrating that there is no difference in the results between binocular and monocular measurements. Thirty-one patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma and 20 normal subjects as controls were involved. Both binocular and monocular measurements of SVV were performed. The main outcome of this study was the difference in the results of SVV between binocular and monocular measurements. There were no significant differences in the tilts of the SVV between binocular and monocular measurements in vestibular schwannoma patients as well as in the controls. Abnormal tilts of SVV may be evaluated precisely only by binocular vision instead of monocular vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442471     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1589-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  The stepping test: two phases of the labyrinthine reflex.

Authors:  T FUKUDA
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1959 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Idiosyncratic compensation of the subjective visual horizontal and vertical in 60 patients after unilateral vestibular deafferentation.

Authors:  Anna Hafström; Per-Anders Fransson; Mikael Karlberg; Måns Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex.

Authors:  Iole Indovina; Vincenzo Maffei; Gianfranco Bosco; Myrka Zago; Emiliano Macaluso; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Distance impairs postural stability only under binocular viewing.

Authors:  Thanh-Thuan Lê; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Humans use internal models to construct and update a sense of verticality.

Authors:  Julien Barra; Adélaïde Marquer; Roxane Joassin; Céline Reymond; Liliane Metge; Valérie Chauvineau; Dominic Pérennou
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.

Authors:  R A A Vingerhoets; M De Vrijer; J A M Van Gisbergen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Subjective assessment of visual verticality in follow-up of patients with acute vestibular disease.

Authors:  Angélica Gómez García; Kathrine Jáuregui-Renaud
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.697

8.  Ocular torsion and perceived vertical in oculomotor, trochlear and abducens nerve palsies.

Authors:  M Dieterich; T Brandt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Pattern of otolith dysfunction in posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory cerebellar infarction.

Authors:  Hyun-Ah Kim; Hyung Lee; Hyon-Ah Yi; Seong-Ryong Lee; Se-Youp Lee; Robert W Baloh
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Otolith dysfunction in vestibular neuritis: recovery pattern and a predictor of symptom recovery.

Authors:  H-A Kim; J-H Hong; H Lee; H-A Yi; S-R Lee; S-Y Lee; B-C Jang; B-H Ahn; R W Baloh
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual perception of upright: Head tilt, visual errors and viewing eye.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Grisel Gonzalez; Jorge Otero-Millan; Adrian Lasker
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.435

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.