Literature DB >> 21442212

A comparison of recombinant receptor-reporter gene bioassays and a total estrogen enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the rapid screening of estrogenic activity in natural and waste waters.

Mayumi Allinson1, Fujio Shiraishi, Graeme Allinson.   

Abstract

In this study, we compared the performance as screening tools of two yeast-based recombinant receptor-reporter gene bioassays with a commercial ELISA kit for measurement of total estrogens. For WWTP effluents there was a very good correlation between the measured total estrogen concentrations (ELISA) and estrogenic activity by the hERα bioassay (r(2)=0.93), but not for the medERα bioassay (r(2)=0.50). For freshwater samples, the correlations between bioassay response and ELISA ES measurements were very good (r(2)>0.95). There was no correlation between bioassay response and ELISA ES measurements for estuarine samples. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442212     DOI: 10.1007/s00128-011-0251-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0007-4861            Impact factor:   2.151


  1 in total

1.  Screening for potential effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in peri-urban creeks and rivers in Melbourne, Australia using mosquitofish and recombinant receptor-reporter gene assays.

Authors:  Kavitha Chinathamby; Mayumi Allinson; Fujio Shiraishi; Andreas L Lopata; Dayanthi Nugegoda; Vincent Pettigrove; Graeme Allinson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.