Literature DB >> 21442156

Length of productive life of sows in four pig farms in the tropics of Mexico.

José C Segura-Correa1, Enrique J Ek-Mex, Alejandro Alzina-López, Juan G Magaña-Monforte, Luis Sarmiento-Franco, Ronald H Santos-Ricalde.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of some factors on the length of productive life (LPL), the number of parities (NP), and the culling interval (CI) of sows. The information from 2003 to 2009 of 3,746 sows with LPL and NP records and 5,819 sows with CI records from the four farms of Yucatan, Mexico was used. LPL was defined as the number of days between the first farrowing and culling or death and CI as the number of days between the last farrowing and culling. To determine the effects of farm, litter size at first farrowing (LSF1) and age at first farrowing (AF1) on LPL and NP, and of farm, LSF1 and culling reason on CI general linear models were used. Means and standard errors for LPL, NP, and CI were 496.4 ± 8.42 days, 3.35 ± 0.04 parities, and 48.3 ± 0.52 days, respectively. All factors had significant effects (P < 0.05) on LPL, NP, and CI. The sows from farm 2 stayed longer (806.0 days) and had more parities (5.25) than the sows from the other farms. Sows with the smallest litters (≤8 piglets) at first farrowing stayed the least time in the farm (675.1 days) and had the fewest parities (4.49). Gilts farrowing the first time before 331 days of age stayed longer time in the farm (726.4 days) and had more parities (4.81) in comparison with 331-348 and more than 348 days age groups. With respect to CI, the sows in farm 3 stayed the longest time in the farm. Sows with more than five parities were culled sooner after their last farrowing. In conclusion, differences between farms for LPL, PN, and CI were found. Females that farrowed at a short age and those with large litters stayed longer in the herd. Old sows and those culled for reproductive reasons stayed the least time in the herd after their last farrowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442156     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9824-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  7 in total

1.  Bioeconomic evaluation of sow longevity and profitability.

Authors:  S L Rodriguez-Zas; B R Southey; R V Knox; J F Connor; J F Lowe; B J Roskamp
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Length of productive life of crossbred sows is affected by farm management, leg conformation, sow's own prolificacy, sow's origin parity and genetics.

Authors:  T Serenius; K J Stalder
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Developmental factors that influence sow longevity.

Authors:  M D Hoge; R O Bates
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Analysis of longevity and exterior traits on Large White sows in Switzerland.

Authors:  J Tarrés; J P Bidanel; A Hofer; V Ducrocq
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Factors affecting length of productive life in Swedish commercial sows.

Authors:  L Engblom; N Lundeheim; E Strandberg; M del P Schneider; A-M Dalin; K Andersson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Culling intervals and culling risks in four stages of the reproductive life of first service and reserviced female pigs in commercial herds.

Authors:  Y Sasaki; Y Koketsu
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.

Authors:  T Serenius; K J Stalder; T J Baas; J W Mabry; R N Goodwin; R K Johnson; O W Robison; M Tokach; R K Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Lifetime and per year productivity of sows in four pig farms in the tropics of Mexico.

Authors:  Jesús Enrique Ek-Mex; José Candelario Segura-Correa; Alejandro Alzina-López; Laura Batista-Garcia
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Breeding objectives for pigs in Kenya. I: bio-economic model development and application to smallholder production systems.

Authors:  Jackson M Mbuthia; Thomas O Rewe; Alexander K Kahi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  The Effect of the Size of the Litter in Which the Sow Was Born on Her Lifetime Productivity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Warda; Anna Rekiel; Tadeusz Blicharski; Martyna Batorska; Marcin Sońta; Justyna Więcek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Estimation of Genetic Parameters and Trends for Length of Productive Life and Lifetime Production Traits in a Commercial Landrace and Yorkshire Swine Population in Northern Thailand.

Authors:  Udomsak Noppibool; Mauricio A Elzo; Skorn Koonawootrittriron; Thanathip Suwanasopee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.509

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.