Literature DB >> 21441903

Low strength of deep San Andreas fault gouge from SAFOD core.

David A Lockner1, Carolyn Morrow, Diane Moore, Stephen Hickman.   

Abstract

The San Andreas fault accommodates 28-34 mm yr(-1) of right lateral motion of the Pacific crustal plate northwestward past the North American plate. In California, the fault is composed of two distinct locked segments that have produced great earthquakes in historical times, separated by a 150-km-long creeping zone. The San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) is a scientific borehole located northwest of Parkfield, California, near the southern end of the creeping zone. Core was recovered from across the actively deforming San Andreas fault at a vertical depth of 2.7 km (ref. 1). Here we report laboratory strength measurements of these fault core materials at in situ conditions, demonstrating that at this locality and this depth the San Andreas fault is profoundly weak (coefficient of friction, 0.15) owing to the presence of the smectite clay mineral saponite, which is one of the weakest phyllosilicates known. This Mg-rich clay is the low-temperature product of metasomatic reactions between the quartzofeldspathic wall rocks and serpentinite blocks in the fault. These findings provide strong evidence that deformation of the mechanically unusual creeping portions of the San Andreas fault system is controlled by the presence of weak minerals rather than by high fluid pressure or other proposed mechanisms. The combination of these measurements of fault core strength with borehole observations yields a self-consistent picture of the stress state of the San Andreas fault at the SAFOD site, in which the fault is intrinsically weak in an otherwise strong crust. ©2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21441903     DOI: 10.1038/nature09927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  4 in total

1.  Earth science. Strength of the San Andreas

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Talc-bearing serpentinite and the creeping section of the San Andreas fault.

Authors:  Diane E Moore; Michael J Rymer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  New evidence on the state of stress of the san andreas fault system.

Authors:  M D Zoback; M L Zoback; V S Mount; J Suppe; J P Eaton; J H Healy; D Oppenheimer; P Reasenberg; L Jones; C B Raleigh; I G Wong; O Scotti; C Wentworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Fault zone fabric and fault weakness.

Authors:  Cristiano Collettini; André Niemeijer; Cecilia Viti; Chris Marone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Correlation between deep fluids, tremor and creep along the central San Andreas fault.

Authors:  Michael Becken; Oliver Ritter; Paul A Bedrosian; Ute Weckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  An analytical model of dynamic sliding friction during impact.

Authors:  Kazuo Arakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Across-Fault Velocity Gradients and Slip Behavior of the San Andreas Fault Near Parkfield.

Authors:  N Piana Agostinetti; G Giacomuzzi; C Chiarabba
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.720

4.  Role of Weak Materials in Earthquake Rupture Dynamics.

Authors:  Tetsuro Hirono; Kenichi Tsuda; Shunya Kaneki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Bridging earthquakes and mountain building in the Santa Cruz Mountains, CA.

Authors:  Curtis W Baden; David L Shuster; Felipe Aron; Julie C Fosdick; Roland Bürgmann; George E Hilley
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Episodic creep events on the San Andreas Fault caused by pore-pressure variations.

Authors:  Mostafa Khoshmanesh; Manoochehr Shirzaei
Journal:  Nat Geosci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 16.908

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.