Literature DB >> 21441858

Financial conflicts of interest in economic analyses in oncology.

Sekwon Jang1, Young Kwang Chae, Navneet S Majhail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Financial conflicts of interest can influence biomedical research. Using data from the American Society of Hematology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings, we evaluated the frequency and influence of financial conflicts of interest on economic analyses in oncology.
METHODS: We systematically searched for economic analyses among American Society of Hematology (2006 to 2008) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (2004 to 2008) annual meeting abstracts. Information was collected on the presence and type of conflict of interest, type of economic analysis, health technology assessed, and author affiliations. To evaluate the influence of conflicts of interest on study results, the abstracts were categorized into 3 groups based on whether the study conclusions directly supported, indirectly supported, or did not support the sponsor's product.
RESULTS: Some financial conflicts of interest were present in 236 of 356 (66%) abstracts of economic analyses, which were submitted for presentation at these meetings. Among economic analyses with a conflict of interest, the conclusions of 138 (59%) studies directly supported the sponsor's product. Another 74 (31%) studies with a conflict of interest indirectly supported the sponsor's product.
CONCLUSIONS: Financial conflicts of interest are prevalent in economic analyses presented at major oncology meetings. The majority of studies with any financial conflict of interest directly or indirectly support the sponsor's product.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21441858     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181f4799b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of health economic evaluations of vaccines in Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Marli Christovam Sartori; Luciana Martins Rozman; Tassia Cristina Decimoni; Roseli Leandro; Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes; Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Distribution and Patterns of Industry-Related Payments to Oncologists in 2014.

Authors:  Deborah C Marshall; Beverly Moy; Madeleine E Jackson; Tim K Mackey; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Industry sponsorship bias in cost effectiveness analysis: registry based analysis.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Ting Zhou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-06-22

4.  Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication.

Authors:  Glen J Weiss; Roger B Davis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  When are statins cost-effective in cardiovascular prevention? A systematic review of sponsorship bias and conclusions in economic evaluations of statins.

Authors:  Ferrán Catalá-López; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; Manuel Ridao; Salvador Peiró
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reporting of conflicts of interest by authors of primary studies on health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Maram B Hakoum; Lama Bou-Karroum; Mounir Al-Gibbawi; Assem M Khamis; Abdul Sattar Raslan; Sanaa Badour; Arnav Agarwal; Fadel Alturki; Gordon Guyatt; Fadi El-Jardali; Elie A Akl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.