Literature DB >> 21441604

Introduction of a new observation chart and education programme is associated with higher rates of vital-sign ascertainment in hospital wards.

Helen Cahill1, Aaron Jones, Robert Herkes, Kathy Cook, Anne Stirling, Tanya Halbert, Amanda Yates, Sean Lal, Alan Gardo, Roy Donnelly, David J Gattas.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Local and national awareness of the need to improve the recognition and response to the clinical deterioration of hospital inpatients is high. The authors designed and implemented a programme to improve recognition of deteriorating patients in their hospital; a new observation chart for vital signs was one of the major elements. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of the new chart and associated education programme on the completeness of vital-sign recording in ward areas. METHODS The setting is a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Three study periods, each lasting 14&amp;emsp14;days (preintervention, 2&amp;emsp14;weeks postintervention, 3&amp;emsp14;months postintervention), were carried out in three wards. The new observation chart was supported by an education programme. The primary outcome measures were the ascertainment rates of individual vital signs as a proportion of total observation sets. RESULTS Documentation of respiratory rate increased from 47.8% to 97.8% (p<0.001) and was sustained at 3&amp;emsp14;months postintervention (98.5%). Collection of a full set of vital signs also improved by a similar magnitude. Basic neurological observation for all patients was introduced in the new chart; the uptake of this was very good (93.1%). Ascertainment rates of blood pressure and oxygen saturation also increased by small but significant amounts from good baseline rates of 97% or higher. CONCLUSION The introduction of a new observation chart, and education regarding its use and importance, was associated with a major improvement in the recording of respiratory rate and other vital signs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21441604     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  4 in total

1.  Clinical utility of an observation and response chart with human factors design characteristics and a track and trigger system: study protocol for a two-phase multisite multiple-methods design.

Authors:  Doug Elliott; Sharon McKinley; Lin Perry; Christine Duffield; Rick Iedema; Robyn Gallagher; Margaret Fry; Michael Roche; Emily Allen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-08-12

Review 2.  Diurnal variation in the performance of rapid response systems: the role of critical care services-a review article.

Authors:  Krishnaswamy Sundararajan; Arthas Flabouris; Campbell Thompson
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2016-02-24

Review 3.  Designing paper-based records to improve the quality of nursing documentation in hospitals: A scoping review.

Authors:  Naomi Muinga; Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde; Chris Paton; Mike English; Marjolein Zweekhorst
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.036

4.  Quantitative systematic review: Sources of inaccuracy in manually measured adult respiratory rate data.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Melany J Christofidis; Mark S Horswill; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.057

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.