Literature DB >> 21441554

Young adult smokers' perceptions of illicit tobacco and the possible impact of plain packaging on purchase behaviour.

Crawford Moodie1, Gerard Hastings, Luk Joossens.   

Abstract

Plain (unbranded) packaging for cigarettes is at the top of the tobacco control agenda in both Australia and Europe. The evidence suggests that it will benefit public health by decreasing the appeal of tobacco products and increasing the power of the health warning. The tobacco industry instead argues that plain packaging would make it easier to counterfeit cigarettes, which would both confuse consumers and reduce price; thereby increasing consumption. Using focus group research we examined young adult smokers (N = 54) perceptions of, and ability to recognize, illicit tobacco and the possible impact of plain packaging on illicit tobacco purchasing behaviour. We found that the pack has no impact on the decision to buy illicit tobacco. Smokers were easily able to identify counterfeit cigarettes, not least by the pack, and buy it knowingly and in the full expectation that it will be inferior in quality. Illicit tobacco purchase, including that for counterfeit tobacco, was instead driven by availability and price. Given the extremely low manufacturing cost, per pack, of certain types of illicit cigarettes, it is difficult to envisage how plain packaging would alter the price of illicit tobacco in any meaningful way. The findings therefore suggest that a move to plain packaging would have no impact on young adult smokers' purchase behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21441554     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.

Authors:  Ann McNeill; Shannon Gravely; Sara C Hitchman; Linda Bauld; David Hammond; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

2.  Young people's perceptions of tobacco packaging: a comparison of EU Tobacco Products Directive & Ireland's Standardisation of Tobacco Act.

Authors:  Kate Babineau; Luke Clancy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Plain packaging of cigarettes: do we have sufficient evidence?

Authors:  Collin N Smith; John D Kraemer; Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-04-02

4.  Standardised tobacco packaging: a health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation.

Authors:  Jenny L Hatchard; Gary J Fooks; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review.

Authors:  Catherine Haighton; Catherine Taylor; Ailsa Rutter
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2017-05-02

6.  Flemish adolescents' perceptions of cigarette plain packaging: a qualitative study with focus group discussions.

Authors:  Guido Van Hal; Sofie Van Roosbroeck; Bart Vriesacker; Matheus Arts; Sarah Hoeck; Jessica Fraeyman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Illicit trade, tobacco industry-funded studies and policy influence in the EU and UK.

Authors:  Gary Jonas Fooks; Silvy Peeters; Karen Evans-Reeves
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico.

Authors:  Ariela Braverman-Bronstein; James F Thrasher; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2018-10-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.