BACKGROUND: The association of HLA A*02 with multiple sclerosis (MS) was recently confirmed by the authors, and it was observed that the combined presence of HLA Cw*05 significantly enhanced (threefold) the protective effect of HLA A*02. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Since A*02-Cw*05 is carried by two HLA extended haplotypes characterised by the B*4402 and B*1801 alleles, respectively, the association analysis was extended to HLA B*44 and B*18 in an Italian sample (1445 MS cases and 973 controls) and these associations were verified in a UK cohort (721 MS cases, 408 controls and 480 family trios). RESULTS: A strong protective effect, independent of DR15, of the A*02-Cw*05 combination carrying B*44 (OR 0.27, p=3.3×10(-5)) was seen in the Italian samples and confirmed in UK family trios (OR 0.33, p=5.5×10(-4)) and in a combined cohort of UK families and case-controls (OR 0.53, p=0.044). This protective effect was significantly stronger than that mediated by A*02 alone. Logistic regression showed that A*02-Cw*05 maintained a significant protection when adjusted for B alleles (Italy: OR 0.38, p=6.5×10(-7); UK: OR 0.60, p=0.0029), indicating that it was not secondary to linkage disequilibrium with B*44. Different from A*02, the other HLA class I tested markers individually showed no significant (Cw*05, B*18) or a modest (B*44) protection when adjusted for the remaining markers. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified at least two independent protective effects which are tagged by A*02-Cw*05 and A*02, respectively. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether this protective effect is due to the presence of an unanalysed factor characterising the HLA extended haplotype(s) carrying A*02 and Cw*05 or to a direct interaction between these alleles.
BACKGROUND: The association of HLA A*02 with multiple sclerosis (MS) was recently confirmed by the authors, and it was observed that the combined presence of HLA Cw*05 significantly enhanced (threefold) the protective effect of HLA A*02. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Since A*02-Cw*05 is carried by two HLA extended haplotypes characterised by the B*4402 and B*1801 alleles, respectively, the association analysis was extended to HLA B*44 and B*18 in an Italian sample (1445 MS cases and 973 controls) and these associations were verified in a UK cohort (721 MS cases, 408 controls and 480 family trios). RESULTS: A strong protective effect, independent of DR15, of the A*02-Cw*05 combination carrying B*44 (OR 0.27, p=3.3×10(-5)) was seen in the Italian samples and confirmed in UK family trios (OR 0.33, p=5.5×10(-4)) and in a combined cohort of UK families and case-controls (OR 0.53, p=0.044). This protective effect was significantly stronger than that mediated by A*02 alone. Logistic regression showed that A*02-Cw*05 maintained a significant protection when adjusted for B alleles (Italy: OR 0.38, p=6.5×10(-7); UK: OR 0.60, p=0.0029), indicating that it was not secondary to linkage disequilibrium with B*44. Different from A*02, the other HLA class I tested markers individually showed no significant (Cw*05, B*18) or a modest (B*44) protection when adjusted for the remaining markers. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified at least two independent protective effects which are tagged by A*02-Cw*05 and A*02, respectively. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether this protective effect is due to the presence of an unanalysed factor characterising the HLA extended haplotype(s) carrying A*02 and Cw*05 or to a direct interaction between these alleles.
Authors: Jenny Link; Ingrid Kockum; Aslaug R Lorentzen; Benedicte A Lie; Elisabeth G Celius; Helga Westerlind; Marie Schaffer; Lars Alfredsson; Tomas Olsson; Boel Brynedal; Hanne F Harbo; Jan Hillert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Lisa F Barcellos; Rogier Q Hintzen; Catherine Schaefer; Cornelia M van Duijn; Janelle A Noble; Towfique Raj; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Barbara E Stranger; Jorge Oksenberg; Tomas Olsson; Bruce V Taylor; Stephen Sawcer; David A Hafler; Mary Carrington; Philip L De Jager; Paul I W de Bakker Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 5.917