BACKGROUND: We examined: (i) the usefulness of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) to correctly rank adolescents into physical fitness levels; (ii) the capacity of the IFIS for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; and (iii) the reliability of the IFIS in adolescents. METHODS: The study comprised 3059 adolescents (aged 12.5-17.5 years) from nine European countries (HELENA study). Blood samples were collected in one-third of the participants (randomly selected, n = 981). Test-retest reliability of the IFIS was studied in a separate sample of 277 adolescents. Physical fitness-cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscular fitness (MF), speed-agility (SP-AG), flexibility and overall fitness-was self-reported using 5-point Likert-scale questions (1 = very poor, 5 = very good) and measured using standard field-based tests. The CVD risk factors measured included total/central adiposity indices and mean arterial pressure, total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin resistance (HOMA) and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance showed that adolescents reporting better fitness had higher measured fitness levels for all the variables studied (all P < 0.001), regardless of gender, age and weight status. Adolescents reporting very good overall fitness, CRF and SP-AG had a healthier cardiovascular profile in eight out of nine CVD risk factors studied. Perfect agreement (same test-retest answer) was observed in 65% of the adolescents and perfect-acceptable agreement (same answer or ±1) in 97% of the adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: (i) The IFIS is able to correctly rank adolescents according to their measured physical fitness levels; (ii) adolescents reporting a good/very good overall fitness, CRF or SP-AG have a more favorable cardiovascular profile; and (iii) The IFIS is reliable in adolescents.
BACKGROUND: We examined: (i) the usefulness of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) to correctly rank adolescents into physical fitness levels; (ii) the capacity of the IFIS for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; and (iii) the reliability of the IFIS in adolescents. METHODS: The study comprised 3059 adolescents (aged 12.5-17.5 years) from nine European countries (HELENA study). Blood samples were collected in one-third of the participants (randomly selected, n = 981). Test-retest reliability of the IFIS was studied in a separate sample of 277 adolescents. Physical fitness-cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscular fitness (MF), speed-agility (SP-AG), flexibility and overall fitness-was self-reported using 5-point Likert-scale questions (1 = very poor, 5 = very good) and measured using standard field-based tests. The CVD risk factors measured included total/central adiposity indices and mean arterial pressure, total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin resistance (HOMA) and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance showed that adolescents reporting better fitness had higher measured fitness levels for all the variables studied (all P < 0.001), regardless of gender, age and weight status. Adolescents reporting very good overall fitness, CRF and SP-AG had a healthier cardiovascular profile in eight out of nine CVD risk factors studied. Perfect agreement (same test-retest answer) was observed in 65% of the adolescents and perfect-acceptable agreement (same answer or ±1) in 97% of the adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: (i) The IFIS is able to correctly rank adolescents according to their measured physical fitness levels; (ii) adolescents reporting a good/very good overall fitness, CRF or SP-AG have a more favorable cardiovascular profile; and (iii) The IFIS is reliable in adolescents.
Authors: Maxime Caru; Daniel Curnier; Ariane Levesque; Serge Sultan; Valérie Marcil; Caroline Laverdière; Daniel Sinnett; Lucia Romo; Laurence Kern Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alessandro Gatti; Lorenzo Pugliese; Vittoria Carnevale Pellino; Marco Del Bianco; Matteo Vandoni; Nicola Lovecchio Journal: Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ Date: 2022-06-18
Authors: Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Jonatan R Ruiz; Virginia A Aparicio; Francisco B Ortega; Diego Munguía-Izquierdo; Inmaculada C Alvarez-Gallardo; Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Daniel Camiletti-Moirón; Alejandro Romero; Fernando Estévez-López; Blanca Samos; Antonio J Casimiro; Ángela Sierra; Pedro A Latorre; Manuel Pulido-Martos; Pedro Femia; Isaac J Pérez-López; Palma Chillón; María J Girela-Rejón; Pablo Tercedor; Alejandro Lucía; Manuel Delgado-Fernández Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; Francisco Javier Gallo; María Puerto López del Amo; Pilar Ruiz-Cabello; Ana Andrade; Milkana Borges-Cosic; Antonio Rubén Peces-Rama; Zuzana Spacírová; Inmaculada C Álvarez-Gallardo; Leticia García-Mochón; Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Fernando Estévez-López; Daniel Camiletti-Moirón; Jose Jesús Martín-Martín; Pilar Aranda; Manuel Delgado-Fernández; Virginia A Aparicio Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 3.295